TruthMove Declaration - Try Not to Laugh

The one which is not like the others is the question of what hit the Pentagon. I happen to believe that an airplane did hit the Pentagon, but I respect the opinions of those who are skeptical about that conclusion.

I'm glad they have a rabbinically approved "Truth" Movement(TM). Something that I flush down the toilet comes to mind.

"Holocaust denial/revisionism and Jewish conspiracy theories"

"All forms of racism"
Unless you happen to be of German ancestry, think the Truth was not told at the end of WWII, and want an honest and objective examination of the available evidence. Then you are held to be nothing but "Nazi scum" unworthy of anything but several years in solitary confinement.

And damn! I'm pulling punches V. I am being excessively kind to you. You do not deserve it.

truthmove wrote:
Well, it's good to see that most all the complaints so far have been irrational, personal vendettas, and generally insignificant.

Perhaps this seems like an accurate assessment of the critique you have seen so far, but rest assured, there are other much more substantial criticisms waiting in the wings. My opinion, in a nutshell, is that there is not nearly enough trust and good faith in the 9/11 Truth Movement right now for a platform like this to be anything but divisive and destructive. (And by that I mean, divisive among people who might otherwise work together constructively -- blind unity for unity's sake is not a goal of mine.) There are indeed good reasons that ALL of us should be looking carefully at EVERY aspect of the Truth movement and asking ourselves, if there was going to be a controlled false opposition movement to the 9/11 OCT what would it look like and might it look like this. That's a starting point for a process of inquiry, not a foregone conclusion, but one that strikes me as more and more important.

Despite being a signatory to the above statement from TruthMove which says that doubting the official story of AA77 hitting the Pentagon hurts the movement, and having stated in the past that he has no doubt that AA77 hit the Pentagon, Jon Gold will be introducing David Ray Griffin, proponent of both the fact that AA77 did *could not have hit the Pentagon* and that the Twin Towers and WTC7 *had* to have been brought down by controlled demolition, which Jon Gold believes is still not proven beyond a reasonable doubt.  Jon Gold has also said that the calls "from the planes" on 9/11 are proof that the planes were hijacked whereas Dr. Griffin is on record saying that he does not believe there were any Arab or Muslim hijackers that day, just framed patsies.

David Ray Griffin - 'Time For A Second Look' Tour - Pennsylvania, April 7

STFU. That's what I say when someone tells me how to think and follows it up by instructing me on how to act. And these guys even teach us how to treat 'bad truthers' when we encounter them! Thank Gold!

Who cares what these people sign.

Anyone who needs a group to tell them what is good thought and what is bad should probably join up!

Whenever I come accross Jon Gold, he's plugging himself or he's mentioning an important topic while pointing out that he's been pointing it out in other blogs, links, articles, scribbles and declarations.

These people are positioning themselves for careers as 9/11 Truthers.

....begin sarcasm....

Thanks to this and the ongoing education I get from Jon Gold and others I'm now thinking to myself:

"wheww! thank GOD these authorities of 9/11 Truth have signed and declared UFO and Alien Abduction as a bad line of focus for 911 Truth"

Don't lie you guys! You know we were all leaning towards that NAZI alien abduction victim was blackmailed into pulling the Directed Energy Weapons trigger and forced blame all the Jews' theory. Or am I the only one?

Whewww. Thank god for these guys helping to set us all straight. And then taking the time to instruct us on how to act when we encounter bad 911 Truth thoughts.

...end sarcasm...

What a load of trash.

"Do not allow the proliferation of irresponsible information or damaging behavior simply because the individuals or groups in question maintain a certain reputation or notoriety within the movement."

Bill "the Shill" Douglas anyone?