Questioning September 11: A Reasonable Pursuit of Truth

gretavo's picture

[Collaboration with AI…]

The events of September 11, 2001, fundamentally reshaped global politics and public policy, yet the official narrative attributing the attacks to 19 hijackers under the direction of Osama bin Laden has not been universally accepted without question. Serious concerns persist about the evidence, investigative processes, and unresolved anomalies. This essay critically examines the collapses of the Twin Towers and WTC 7, financial irregularities, the arrest of five Israelis on the day of the attacks, allegations involving Palestinians, and a broader pattern of transparency issues. Together, these factors highlight why further scrutiny is reasonable and necessary.

1. The Nature of the Evidence

Circumstantial Evidence

The evidence tying the 19 hijackers to the attacks is heavily circumstantial:
• Airport Security Footage: Videos show individuals identified as hijackers passing through security checkpoints. However, the footage does not independently verify their identities or directly link them to the events on the planes.
• Recovered Items: Mohamed Atta’s luggage, which failed to transfer onto Flight 11, contained materials such as flight manuals and a will. While these items are suggestive, the convenient discovery raises questions about whether they were intentionally planted.
• Passports and IDs: The discovery of Satam al-Suqami’s passport near Ground Zero has been widely criticized due to the improbability of such an item surviving the destruction.

Torture Confessions

Key confessions, such as those by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), were obtained under torture. KSM, waterboarded 183 times, admitted to orchestrating the attacks, but the Senate Intelligence Committee’s Torture Report revealed that torture often produces unreliable or fabricated information. The reliance on such confessions undermines confidence in the official narrative.

2. The Collapse of the Twin Towers

The official explanation for the destruction of the Twin Towers attributes the collapses to structural failures caused by jet impacts and subsequent fires. However, several anomalies suggest further investigation is warranted.

a. Constant Acceleration

The upper sections of the Twin Towers fell at approximately two-thirds of free-fall acceleration, encountering minimal resistance from the intact lower structure. Critics argue this behavior is inconsistent with gravitational collapse alone, suggesting the possibility of controlled demolition.

b. Eyewitness Testimony of Explosions

Numerous first responders and survivors reported hearing explosions before and during the collapses, describing loud bangs, flashes, and secondary detonations. These testimonies were largely excluded from official investigations, and there has been no public evidence addressing whether they were seriously examined.

c. Pulverization of Materials

The near-total pulverization of concrete into fine dust and the lateral ejection of steel beams are difficult to reconcile with fire and gravity alone. These phenomena raise questions about whether additional energy sources were involved.

d. Lack of Collapse Modeling by NIST

NIST’s investigation focused on the initiation of the collapse but did not model the complete collapse sequence of the Twin Towers. This omission has been criticized as leaving a critical gap in understanding the mechanism of their destruction.

3. The Collapse of WTC 7

The collapse of World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7), a 47-story building not struck by a plane, remains one of the most controversial aspects of 9/11.

a. Symmetry and Acceleration

WTC 7 collapsed symmetrically, with portions occurring at near-free-fall acceleration for 2.25 seconds, indicating minimal resistance from its internal structure. Critics argue that fire alone could not cause the simultaneous failure of all key supports.

b. Eyewitness Testimony of Explosions

First responders reported hearing explosions and seeing flashes in WTC 7 before its collapse. These accounts were not adequately addressed in NIST’s final report.

c. Lack of Transparency by NIST

NIST has refused to release the data and modeling underlying its WTC 7 analysis, citing national security concerns. This lack of transparency prevents independent review of its conclusions.

d. Independent Findings

A study by Dr. Leroy Hulsey and the University of Alaska Fairbanks challenged NIST’s conclusions, finding no plausible scenario in which fire alone caused the observed collapse.

4. The Five Israelis Arrested on 9/11

The arrest of five Israelis on September 11 adds another layer of complexity.

a. The Incident

Shortly after the first plane struck the North Tower, a New Jersey resident reported individuals on a van roof, photographing and appearing to celebrate. The van, registered to Urban Moving Systems, was stopped, and its occupants were detained.

b. Statements by the Detainees

The driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, reportedly told officers, “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.”

c. Investigation and Deportation

Although a bomb-sniffing dog reportedly reacted positively to the van, no explosives were found. Key details of the FBI’s investigation remain classified. The individuals were deported after weeks of detention on immigration violations, without charges related to 9/11.

5. Financial Anomalies: Put Options

Suspicious trading activity before 9/11 suggests possible foreknowledge of the attacks:
• Unusual Put Options: Researchers, such as Professor Allen Poteshman, identified unusually high volumes of put options (bets on stock price declines) for airlines involved in the attacks, including United Airlines and American Airlines.
• Statistical Improbability: The likelihood of such trading occurring by chance is extremely low, suggesting insider knowledge.
• Lack of Transparency: Official investigations dismissed the activity as coincidental, but the identities of traders and details of the investigations remain undisclosed.

6. Palestinians and 9/11

Palestinians were tied to the 9/11 narrative in several ways, though the evidence is inconclusive:
• False Claim by the DFLP: The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP) was initially reported to have claimed responsibility for the attacks. However, the group denied making this claim, suggesting it was a false attribution by unknown parties.
• Reports of Celebrations: Media outlets aired footage of Palestinians celebrating the attacks, but critics later questioned the authenticity and context of this footage, suggesting it may have been misrepresented.
• References by the Arrested Israelis: The Israelis arrested on 9/11 explicitly referenced Palestinians, stating, “The Palestinians are the problem.” The context of this remark remains unclear.

7. Lack of Transparency: A Pattern

A consistent lack of transparency undermines the credibility of the 9/11 investigation:
• NIST: Refusal to release collapse models and key data for WTC 7, citing national security concerns.
• FBI: Withholding details of investigations into the five Israelis and their potential connections to the attacks.
• SEC: Failure to disclose the identities of traders involved in unusual put option activity.
• Classified Evidence: Key materials, including full flight manifests and forensic test results, remain inaccessible to the public.

This pattern of withholding information prevents independent review and fuels skepticism about the official narrative.

Conclusion

The official narrative of September 11 leaves significant questions unanswered. The reliance on circumstantial evidence, the omissions in collapse modeling, anomalies in financial activity, and the handling of detainees all point to the need for greater transparency and scrutiny. Historical precedents of narrative manipulation further justify skepticism. Questioning the events of 9/11 is not only reasonable but essential to ensure accountability and transparency for one of the most consequential events in modern history.