Let's Concoct Fake Champions - Or... How Fake Was the Loose Change British Press Conference?
Introduced by someone from the BBC?! The same BBC that made a hackumentary about 9/11 Truth featuring bottom of the barrel "truther" like Jim Fetzer, right-wingish showman Alex Jones, and the boy blunder himself, Dylan Avery? Indeed. What strikes me most about the "press conference" below is how you don't see a single reporter in the audience. You see no one in the audience, and yet everyone on stage seems to be making an effort to look like they are talking to a big group of people. Guess what? I don't think this was a real press conference. I think this was a staged event designed to make it look like big things are afoot when in fact it's probably more like bigfoot things are.
Also, the guy from mercury media incorrectly claims that LC was the first investigative film on 9/11. Kof bull kof shit kof kof...
I hate to say it, but you know what this smells like? Video fakery! That's right--not the no planes hit the towers variety--more like the blackbeard bin Laden video fakery, or the fake beheading videos. Kinda makes it clear why there is a mega-disinfo variety of "video fakery" at all, eh? To distract from the (groan) REAL video fakery going on!
- gretavo's blog
- Login to post comments
Frontline Club?
http://www.frontlineclub.com/club_misc.php?id=30
can't seem to find their "press conference" listed...maybe because not registered.
that being said, i am glad you posted this, Gretavo, as it was interesting and informative. perhaps i'm naive, but i do find myself falling for what appears to be Dylan's up-front sincerity and candor. wouldn't hurt newbies to view this... Â
I just watched it this
I just watched it this morning.
The absence of a visible audience was a little strange. At one time that I recall, they showed like 2 guys in the audience as one asked a question. Could that have been it?
As to what was said, I couldn't poke any holes in it, without listening again anyways... seemed pretty straightforward. The one time I watched LCFC with divided attention, I mainly recall being surprised how long they spent on the ISI money transfer?! And I read other critiques groaning that they didn't cover SJones' research properly, & no Israel talk.
just started watching final cut last night
one third through. long, man!without a full or second viewing as of yet,  my inclination is to say that this is going to be a good film/docu for newbies. it's like they backtracked from LC II which was not as palatable for those being first introduced to this stuff.
not alluding to or mentioning mossad/zionists, etc, may be the only way to slip this film through the cracks into the more-mainstream consciousness. Then, hopefully what should follow: interested new truthers will desire to dig further.
at least LC strongly imparts the inside job and controlled demo/impossible pentagon and shanksville aspects of the crime. Â
it's not totally horrid content wise
BUT it includes a lot of ISI BS, and is kind of boring. what may happen is people won't flock to see it and rely on "debunkers' " critiques of it. Just because it was fact checked by DRG doesn't mean it isn't designed for easy (if dishonest) "debunking". I'd like to think the boyz are just incompetent and attention mongers and not something more sinister but I can't say I'm convinced... of course something is prob better than nothing...