 |
|
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 6 guests online.
User loginNavigationFeatured Content WTCD Wiki WTCD Compendium WTCD Podcasts Glossary 9/11 TV News Archive 9/11 Unveiled by Enver Masud David Chandler's YouTube Channel Council for the National Interest Popular Mechanics: Money Masters Orwell Rolls in His Grave Reel Bad Arabs Recent blog posts
WTCD User Comments
|
EXCLUSIVE FEATURE! ANNOYMOUSE CLAIMS SIBEL EDMONDIS ABOUT TO JUMP THE SHARK! 
Sibel
Submitted by Annoymouse on Mon, 2007-10-29 20:02.
check this out: huhh... sort of strange |
PollWho destroyed the WTC on 9/11? Al Qaeda 0% The Guy who made billions from its destruction 100% Total votes: 1 Disqus Comments |
And now for something completely different......
The Height Of Hypocrisy? Or Maybe Not Yet??
III: One Good Lie Deserves Another
http://winterpatriot.blogspot.com/
Remember the Kennebunkport fiasco? Check this out.
Its on Daily Kos, wow!
Its on Daily Kos, wow! Reading her allegations makes no sense to me. I think it's going to be a diversion/disinfo move. What she has said so far on 9-11 itself is pointed at alleged suadi/pakistani/turkish/etc states involved in mid/higher level al quaeda. Still, none of them has access to bomb 3 wtc buildings from the inside. I think her story was built up for an old phony story that has already been debunked by truthers but can still get traction from the undecided or uninformed.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/9/10/17719/2719
http://dailykos.com/story/2007/10/29/83331/268
I'm just being cynical, i could be wrongÂ
How on earth did I predict
How on earth did I predict that Jon Gold would be the one posting it. I've been saying almost since I figured out the 9/11 attacks were bs that Sibel was a distraction. If she actually cared about the country she would have come right out and gotten her word out. People claimed she might fear for her family but that's BS because getting your name, face, and story out there is better protection! Any thing Gold is pushing like this is a distraction. She could have posted her information in a pdf all over the web so that millions could access it a Looooooooong time ago. This is just going to give laptop warriors ammo for useless babbling while we need more f'ing action in the streets! Rwaaaaar!! http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/modules/smileys/packs/example/jawdrop.gif
:jawdrop:
chin up, mouse!
I'm 100% in agreement and I don't think it's just us. Too little too late, perps!
Mate in 6... 5... 4... :)
i hope you're wrong but i
i hope you're wrong but i tend to agree with you. i never trusted Sibel much to begin with.
i used to think she would be a 9-11 star of sorts
The one to break things wide open. But after I read and watched videos of what she said, the pieces just didn't fit the paradigm i've come to believe in. From what she says, I think she is primed for a lihop story.
yup, Sibel and Sander sitting in a tree...
pushing L-I-H-O-P
look out Patsystan! Beware, Mullahs! Tread carefully, Assad(dam)! Gird your loins, Saudis! Watch the jive, Turkey!
You are all that stands between the perps and their jail cells, and they intend to push you in!
this is a GOOD time to be cynical
VERY cynical--this is one of the last attempts to derail the truth movement, to send it off on another track to Gold knows where... :)
dude,
annonymouse didnt 'claim' anything. he was merely posting information for you to check out.
follow the link to find out who is claiming this all.
just a play on words
and a jab at our insatiable appetite for "new revelations", etc. frankly I could care less what Sibel has to say anymore, unless she gives her press conference in the nude, and even that is becoming less of a draw as the years go by. years. that's how long this Sibel BS has been hyped. And now, just as Selection 2008 is gearing up, she finds the ovaries to talk? There's something tart about this fish--er, fishy about this tart. And to my feminazi friends, I'm not picking on her as a woman, I'm picking on her as a creation--a character scripted to titillate troglodytes and goldenhearted would-be champions of victims' families™. It's like when CNN advertised Paula Zahn as "something sexy", but with less benign motives than higher ratings for propaganda, though then again, maybe Sibel is just a catapult, eh what?
2 questions about Sibel's revelations...
1) Why do the "trusted users" on Dailykos, truth censor par excellence, not troll rate or slam in comments the Sibel diary like they do ANYthing that supports 9/11 truth?
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/10/29/83331/268
here is an earlier similar LIHOP post by the same user "Lukery"
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/9/10/17719/2719
see my take on kos' anti-9/11 truth crusade here: http://wtcdemolition.com/traitorkos.html
2) Why would Sibel single out Turkey--anything to do with Turkey, a moderate and modern Islamic nation that has recently been condemned, rather absurdly, by the US Congress for a nearly century old "genocide" standing in the way of middle eastern/central asian hegemony for a certain little rogue nation we all know and love?
"Lukery"'s blog is one big Sibelfest
http://lukery.blogspot.com/
with LOTS of pics and videos sprinkled throughout--MAN Sibel is hot! She CAN'T be lying!
Selective 911 Truthing.
Gretavo, nothing new. Go to GNN.TV.
Talk about 911 and the trolls come out of the woodwork.
But strangely, Sander Hicks gets the greenlight when ever he posts.
What I find interesting about Sander is that he rarely stays to discuss. He just drops some turds to chew on and then pimps his book with a 'i'll be back with more explosive information soon".... Â
You mention Sibel and Sander Hicks which are two creations I keep in the same bag for years.
always good to confirm
that one isn't alone in seeing the obvious! thanks JPass, and keep up the good work!
hey Jpass, im just going to
hey Jpass, im just going to address you here since im on "moderation" over at blogger now for making a police joke about Arabesque so god knows when that comment will get posted.:
 "I had one experience with Jack Blood and I was done with him and his show. "
do tell. i dont know much about him, all i know is that he confronted Tim Russert who stupidly tried to shill his book on Blood's show. Blood caused him to hang up the phone when asking about 9/11 anomalies and why Russert failed to cover any. hilarious audio.
 ps:GNN is very suspect and im not at all surprised that one Reprehensor once had a very public "falling out" with them. im not usually the accusatory type, i leave that to the professional disinfo police like Victronix Hoffman and Arabesque since that seems to be all they do, but that whole situation stinks of something......
ironically...or not...
My experience with Jack Blood was actually about GNN. Jack Blood had GNN's resident war profiteer and owner / operator Anthony Lappe' on.
I call him a war profiteer because that is what many of these 'leftifist progressives' are doing. Pimping their shit. Exploiting those who suffer from war. That's another blog all together.
Anyway, my friend went on Jack Blood to sort of 'debate' Anthony Lappe' and I felt Jack Blood handled the situation very badly. True it is that my friend came off nervous and unprepared but Jack Blood made it seem the issues he brought up had no merit and at one point freaked out on my friend.
He went into one of what I like to call "pfos' or 'phoney freak outs'. He gets all heated because my buddy said something like "you handled the debate unfairly Jack".
And Jack went into his pfo by screaming to us why he's a super patriot he is.
So I don't know much about the guy but that one incident was enough for me to be skeptical of Jack Blood. I've also heard the Russert clip. That was pretty funny stuff.
On another note...I'm looking for help. See my latest blog which I'll be posting here shortly.
i'll take your word for it.
i'll take your word for it. i really never heard an entire show of his, only clips and small segments so what i knew of him was mostly positive. i know all about the funding of these so called progressive types(Goodman-Ford foundation etc.) and based on Blood's attitude and defense of GNN it sounds like he probably gets some of the same type of funding. GNN is a cesspool of trolls that lash out at 9/11 activists and others(they get pretty mad when you talk about gatekeeping and funding etc., im guessing because they realize they fit perfectly into that category), i gave up on that place a very long time ago. as far as Sander HIcks goes, i agree hes too LIHOP and refuses to connect some pretty obvious dots but ive seen how effective he can be in some circles, particularly with people who have a mental block and just cant or wont entertain the thought of MIHOP on any level, regardless of how good the evidence is. im not saying let Hicks and others like him off the hook, they should be asked why they seemingly refuse to touch certain areas of research but i blame people with more power and influence in the media like Goodman and others for our current situation. afterall, Hicks isnt really stopping as many people from seeing 9/11 for what it is than a Goodman etc. is, is he? i compare him to Press For Truth, not nearly good enough, leaves way too much out but still does the job in getting certain people started down the rabbit hole. im of the opinion that once most people start on 9/11 they dont stop.
They Got Me With This
Your description of your limited experience with Jack BLood mirrors my own. And that pretty much goes for most of the personalities in the 'movement'.
About GNN...
When I consider the people who spent many hours on that site and then the hostile environment created for 911 Truth there....it's not even a question...
GNN WAS a pioneer for 911 Truth. Lappe' has said this himself and I agree. GNN still pushes it's own take on 911 and it's pretty lame imo. Sander is part of that take for sure. He's been on GNN for a long time. ANyone remember Delmart Vreeland narrative? Possibly the Second Most Gagged 911 Whistleblower in forever!
Imagine a male version of Sibel Edmonds covered in tough tats and peircings. This version of Sibel is more of a 'in the trenches' kind of guy. He's weathered and untrustorthy after years of underbelly exposure to the sekrit world of spies, spooks, tripple agents and other sekrit things.
Reprehensor was big up on GNN for a long time. So was YT, now known as Cosmos and I'm sure others.
GNN created this video which is what got me thinking about 911...
I'm not sure that sites like GNN knowingly bullshit and gatekeep. Maybe more likely that Lappe' just wants to be 'cool' with Arianna Huffington and Daily Kos...maybe holding out for a Chris Mathews moment at some point.Â
This short one about crazy nazi mind scientists.....
Spook or Treat?
Sibel is quoting people from this very web site...
In a way...we should all feel special because Sibel is attempting to address the very issues many of us here had brought up time and time again.
In the BradBLog article she says:
"people say 'why don't you just spill the beans?'"Â
I've made this point many times along with others who frequent this site. Now she is asnwering the call.
Do you think Jon Gold would give credit where it's do? Of course not. Not that anyone here is looking for credit...but we do like to keep tabs on our hypocrits in the 911 Truth movement.
This is my guess.... it's a distraction that is going to the next level. My guess is that Pakistan will soon be fingered with this 'new' ammo that Sibel is going to release.
Soon we will have top sekrit spooks to dig into, heavily classified stories of FBI spookery coupled with under-cover tales of illicit spy activity.
Have fun trying to find the wizard behind the curtain on this one.
I find it note worthy that Jon Gold bashed those who were skeptics of the Sibel narrative and now Sibel is directly addressing those same skeptics! But Jon Gold is still bashing the skeptics that were calling on Sibel to release her information to the American public.
a little Sibel/Gold/911Blogger History...
Why not...
just release it on youtube and bypass the MSM altogether. A video like this will spread like wildfire anyway.
Would you risk everything...
To put something on youtube that could be ingored just like EVERYTHING ELSE on youtube, or would you want insurance that risking everything is actually worth something?
Right now, I'm waiting for someone to say, "Controlled Demolition is backing them up against the wall, so they are going to release Sibel, and take the focus away from the towers, and building 7. Which was her purpose all along."
Edit: LOW AND BEHOLD... from our "good friends" at wtcdemolition.com...
I think it's going to be a diversion/disinfo move. What she has said so far on 9-11 itself is pointed at alleged suadi/pakistani/turkish/etc states involved in mid/higher level al quaeda. Still, none of them has access to bomb 3 wtc buildings from the inside. I think her story was built up for an old phony story that has already been debunked by truthers but can still get traction from the undecided or uninformed.
I could be the next Nostradamus.
Who Is? Archives