Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics by David Chandler

Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics
(Same Article interpreted for less technical readers)
By David Chandler
Journal of 9/11 Studies, Volume 28, February 2010
Grade School Physics
Let’s just face a few simple facts.
Skyscrapers MUST hold themselves up. They must also sway in the wind. The people who design skyscrapers MUST figure out how much steel and how much concrete they are going to put on every level before they even dig the hole for the foundation.
After NINE YEARS why don’t we have a table specifying the TONS of STEEL and TONS of CONCRETE that were on every level of WTCs 1&2? The NIST report does not even specify the TOTAL for the concrete. The total for the steel is in three places. So even if the planes did it that 10,000 page report is CRAP!
Conspiracies are irrelevant. The Truth Movement should be marching on all of the engineering schools in the country. Maybe we should burn physics books on 9/11/11.
Watch that Purdue simulation. If a 150 ton airliner crashes near the top of a skyscraper at 440 mph isn’t the building going to sway? Didn’t the survivors report the building “moving like a wave”? So why do the core columns in the Purdue video remain perfectly still as the plane comes in?
That is the trouble with computer simulations. If they are good, they are very good. But if they have a defect either accidental or deliberate they can be REALLY STUPID once you figure out the flaws.
The distributions of steel and concrete are going to affect the sway of a skyscraper whether it is from the wind or an airliner.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caATBZEKL4c
9/11 is the Piltdown Man incident of the 21st century.
Burn a physics book on 9/11/11 in celebration of SCIENCE