Excerpt From 9/11 Blogger Chief Reprehensor's Daily Kos Diary

He is pimping Peter Lance's book Triple Cross, much to Jon Gold's delight, and doing so moreover not just on 911Blogger but on the Daily Kos, which is well known as a virulently anti-9/11 Truth site. Here is an excerpt from Reprehensor's diary over there, quoting Peter Lance. Try to see for yourself what reason anyone could have for promoting this malarkey--anyone interested in 9/11 truth that is. Some of the commentors on the post at blogger seem to get it, that this is irrelevant in light of the truth about 9/11 that we know, but that hasn't stopped Reprehensor and Jon Gold from promoting it as somehow useful to the movement. How long will the "greater truth movement" tolerate this clear fifth column within its ranks?
THE CHILLING EFFECT
In an article I wrote for playboy.com, published June 16th, I detailed the kind of "Chilling Effect," Fitzgerald sought to achieve with HarperCollins. In the piece I presented evidence that in discrediting a treasure trove of al Qaeda-related intelligence in 1996 (underscored by his June 25th, 1999 sworn affirmation) Fitzgerald himself might have been guilty of the very same perjury and obstruction charges he used to convict Scooter Libby in "Plamegate."
That Playboy piece also detailed another central finding in Triple Cross that Fitzgerald may have found embarrassing: the story of Sphinx Trading. Sphinx was a mailbox-check cashing story located in the same building that housed the al-Salam Mosque of blind Shiekh Omar Abdel Rahman. That mosque location was dubbed "the Jersey Jihad office" during the "Day of Terror" trial co-prosecuted by Fitzgerald and Assistant U.S. Attorney Andy McCarthy in 1995.
Prior to that trial, Fitzgerald and McCarthy compiled a list of 172 un-indicted co-conspirators which included bin Laden and his brother in law Mohammed Jamal Khalifa.
In a November 17th, 2006 piece for The Huffington Post, I made the case that if the Feds, under Fitzgerald (then head of the Organized Crime and Terrorism Unit in the SDNY) had applied just a portion of the energy monitoring Sphinx that they had used on their around-the-clock surveillance of John Gotti's social club in Little Italy, the Towers might still be standing in Lower Manhattan.
Why? Because al-Midhar and al-Hazmi two of the muscle hijackers who flew AA #77 into the Pentagon on 9/11 not only had mailboxes at Sphinx but they got the fake ID’s they used to board that flight from Mohammed El-Attriss, Sphinx’s co-founder and partner of Sphinx with Waleed al Noor.
In that list of unindicted co-conspirators drawn up by McCarthy and Fitzgerald during the Day of Terror trial, Waleed A. Noor was No. 130. That means Fitzgerald considered him important enough to associate with Ali Mohamed and Osama bin Laden himself.
The Feds had been onto Sphinx Trading since 1990 when the killer of Rabbi Meier Kahane (El Sayyid Nosair) was found to have kept a mailbox there.
By 2001, Fitzgerald was the effective "general" directing the Justice Department’s "war on terror." By simply connecting those three dots: from Nosiar to al Noor to El Attriss, the Feds could have been into the "planes operation" executed on 9/11 in July – two months earlier.
AL QAEDA’S MASTER SPY
But perhaps the revelation in Triple Cross most embarrassing to Patrick Fitzgerald related to another name on that list of 172, No 109: Ali A. Mohamed, the al Qaeda master spy who became the central focus of my book.
Not only did the ex-Egyptian army major succeed in scamming the CIA in Hamburg in 1984, but he slipped past a Watch List, seduced a U.S. woman on a TWA flight from Athens to JFK in 1985, married her at a drive-through wedding chapel in Reno, Nevada, then set up a sleeper cell at her home in Silicon Valley.
Months later he enlisted in the U.S. Army where – astonishingly – he succeeded in getting himself posted to the JFK Special Warfare School at Fort Bragg, the highly secure facility where elite Green Beret and Delta Force Officers trained.
20 years ago this week, Ali, known to his radical Islamic bothers as "Ali Amiriki," ("Ali the American") was driving up to New York City where he trained the al Qaeda cell members later convicted in the 1993 WTC, bombing, the Kahane murder and the "Day of Terror" plot (prosecuted by Fitzgerald and McCarthy) whose cell members intended to blow up the bridges and tunnels into Manhattan.

Lance
I remember about 3-4 years ago, Coast to Coast AM had a 911 roundtable, AJ & DRG on the truth side, Lance and some other schmoe on the obfuscation side. Of course the two shills had to maintain cred with a bunch of appeal to authority shit about their knowledge of gummit corruption, so they didn't play the 911 commish report up, they just obfuscated facts and tried to play the Limited Hangout LIHOP card. I'm sure you can find the audio files around somewhere.
Now 911B promotes Lance as though he's some sort of truther. What a crock.
The problem is the disinformationists
The problem is the disinformationists have self appointment themselves as the identifiers and professors of disinformation. Because of that, the most heinous disinformation has been interjected (by them) as a main focus of 911 Truth.
At this stage in the history of 9/11 Truth I find it unfathomable that non-9/11 Truthers refer 'al Qaeda' as a very real and organized thread. Not to mention that self-anointed 9/11 Truth administrators pimp the lie more then anyone I know.
Remember the Shell Game? Bill Douglas anyone? I didn't read the book but I am certain Bill Douglas was given the green light to pimp out the viewership of 9/11 Blogger in an un-unprecedented way.
I don't think I need to tell you all how to be good 9/11 Truthers. You should know by now that it's absolutely NOT OK to peddle the exaggerated 'threat of extremist Islam' anymore. It's not ok to suggest that Muslims were behind the attacks on 9/11/2001.
A non-'annoymouse' sick-of-logins type responds
Why is it 'not okay' to implicate Muslims? Until we have an impartial international inquiry (yeah, right) neither Muslim, Zionist, Nazi nor Mafia involvement can be ruled out.
Until there is total transparency in the 'StandardOil'/Bush/Saiid/Wahabist entanglements (y,r!) I don't think we can make such sweeping claims.
I note 911blogger gets a possibly deserved knocking here (despite stars of research like Aidan Monaghan) but what about truthaction and the likes?
My nym is 'tetrapyloctomist' and I can be found on other similar boards.
I'm beginning to appreciate your stance, gretavo, but please be very careful not to discount the facts merely for the sake of diminishing the messengers - even spooks can have value...
...sometimes.
For starters, what makes you think G wrote that?
More importantly, we have a basic principle in our system of justice that you may have heard of -- the idea that individuals are innocent until proven guilty. I'd say this principle is oh, maybe 1000x more important when the accused ("Al Qaeda," "the hijackers") are symbolically standing in for millions of other human beings. 9/11 was a propaganda spectacular used to animate the specter of Arab/Muslim terrorism. This is indisputable, as far as I am concerned, and it has resulted in more than a million deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq. You can, in your truthing/research, help catapult the propaganda even further, or you can help deconstruct it. It's an easy choice.