Listening to NIST Presentation on 7... and AE Rebuttal

casseia's picture

Have you ever held a too-tight jar lid under running hot water to loosen it? Dr. Sunder wants to know, because that's the key to the collapse of WTC 7! Steel expands when it is heated, and that's the key to the super amazing collapse of the third tower on 9/11. It's all about thermal expansion.

Heat also causes steel to weaken, and *that's* the key to the collapse of 1 and 2, but in the case of 7, it's THERMAL EXPANSION.

(Holy shit... he's blaming it all on fire... I don't think they're going to bring in any other theories. Yep... he has just explicitly excluded explosions, *including* those of any fuel oil tanks in the building. If there had been water available to fight the fires, the building would probably still be there.)

You know what, Dr. Sunder? I'm basically an expert in opening too-tight jars after 15 years in a professional kitchen, and EVERYONE in the biz knows that several sharp raps of the jar rim on a cutting board are what gets the job done. Get it? Some sudden, sharp mechanical force trumps thermal expansion any time... for opening jars.

 

[see also: 2 Live News Conferences on Collapse of WTC7 -gReT]

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
casseia's picture

Oh, and the reason they were separating the examination

of the upper floors from the lower is that the sprinkler system (and overall water supply) to the upper floors was more reliable. Nothing to do with explosions on any lower floors. >whistling innocently<

gretavo's picture

what about reports that the sprinkler system was set to test?

test mode that is? He says it's because the water mains had broken. But also, weren't they pumping water from the river well in advance of 7's collapse? How can it be said that a lack of water was a problem?

casseia's picture

Oooooh, question number three is a truther question.

"Are you contending that localized fires caused all 47 columns to fail simultaneously so that the building collapsed in 8 seconds?"

Dr. Sunder: blah, blah, it was a PROGRESSIVE collapse; they did not fail simultaneously.

[This is freakin' weak, people. Weaker than I thought it would be. They're hardly trying at all.]

gretavo's picture

no no, Cass, they used computer models

So their conclusions are correct. New bogeyman--thermal expansion! Did they test for the presence of explosive residue?

kate of the kiosk's picture

yeah, and what about asking

WHAT WAS STORED IN BUILDING 7????

WHO OCCUPIED BUILDING 7???? 

Mr. Sunder...could you tell us about who and what were in WTC building 7, please? 

 

kate of the kiosk's picture

and who was the guy who actually nailed it about

or something about ...so it would not take that much for the building system to fail without explosives and only fire and thermal expansion as a cause, but what about if you just used a small amount of explosive charges, in other words it would not take a huge amount of explosives...he reiterated several times and was very synchronous to my thinking at the time....

kate of the kiosk's picture

was that RealNews?

bla bla

casseia's picture

Question number 4 from Popular Mechanics

"Ya know, a lot of conspiracy theorists claim that this looked like a controlled demolition because the building fell into such a neat pile. Can you explain why it was not a controlled demolition?"

Dr. Sunder: "Well, you know, in a controlled demolition, charges are placed on many columns... yadda yadda... you can go to a website and see what a controlled demolition looks like... didn't look like this."

gretavo's picture

infowars reporter fucks up - surprise!

embeds the question of whetehr they tested for explosive residue in a rambling discourse, allowing sunder to totally dodge it. thanks again, infowars!

casseia's picture

Was he spherical residue guy?

Because although he was rambly, he did make a point that they admittedly had NO actual steel for 7 to test.

gretavo's picture

yeah that was him

well he could have asked why FEMA didn't give them the sample from WTC7 from their Appendix C, you know, the one that showed signs of ultra high temperature...

kate of the kiosk's picture

Infowars Geiger-counter

emotional, too, but ya know..this kind of bullshit calls for some emotion, not?

the questions from Pop Mechanics mole Ann Cohen about "volume"

 and NYPost about the sprinklers...it's all about the sprinklers...

and what room-tem- IQ question did the NYTimes humanoid ask?

did anyone notice a "collapsed" feed during some of the most elucidating moments???

 i mean, man, how do these people sleep???

 

 

casseia's picture

Holy shit... there are major technical difficulties...

The video wouldn't load at all, the audio is really spotty. The audio was gone completely for 3-4 minutes, and when it popped back on, it turns out some dude was grilling him about thermate!

One factor used to rule out explosive demolition is that they determined it would just be too damn loud. Charges sufficient to sever those critical columns would have been equivalent to a jet engine, heard from a mile away (or something), blah blah.

So thermate dude rejoins, but thermate would sever the columns relatively quietly!

Well, it would take about a hundred pounds of therMITE, sez Dr. S., and you would have to find a way to get it to stick to the columns, and that just wouldn't work.

Good job, truther dude!

gretavo's picture

yup I noticed the mite/mate dodge

but note that the distinction that is important is not thermate thermite but regular thermate/mite versus the actually explosive "NANOthermite/mate" which uses much smaller particles.

casseia's picture

Sure, but the mite/mate distinction is also salient...

but again, keeping it simple is evidently very hard.

kate of the kiosk's picture

nanothermate/mite

right, i caught that, too...the stuff they could paint on, perhaps?

gretavo's picture

bingo

well i guess we should see what the experts on our side say... is the paintable stuff of the red/gray chips explosive? also i find it hilarious, alomg the lihe of the double standard, that to use thermite you apparently have to cut through entire one thousand pound one foot tall sections of 50 columns with 100 pounds of thermite on each. Or so says NIST. Why, I ask, couldn't we assume that simply thinning the columns over a span of 1 centimeter each (like a slice) combined with the weakening of the remaining unthinned sections by heat could get the job done? After all, the heating of the columns by proximity to 3000 plus degree molten iron has to be at least as significant as heating by proximity to burning SEC case files...

Tahooey's picture

i picked up on that too


it would take 100 lbs of thermite to melt an entire one foot section;

well what about cutting a 1 inch section at a 45 degree angle, that would instantly disable an entire column and would require less than 9 lbs of thermite (running with NIST's numbers here) per column.

I'll have to look through their details some more but after first review there are a few other things I'm left wondering about; has the proposed failure of shear studs been demonstrated in repeatable tests? Were there not shear studs on the cross beam connecting 44 to 79? Why didn't the composite concrete flooring on the other side of said beam provide substantial resistance to expansion and thereby prevent the beam/column connection from shearing? (From their 29MB poster, you'd think the expansion was pushing into open space, wasn't there a continuous composite floor there?) Wouldn't the composite flooring's torsional resistance and lateral reinforcing provide substantial resistance to "free fall" collapse subsequent to the initial failure and thereby minimize impact on the floor below?

This was an extremely redundant structure and as such it's incredibly difficult to imagine that a single column's failure could lead to the observed nearly instantaneous collapse of the entire structure. Their visual demonstration seems to depend on a perfect storm of combined local events, and the failure in the visualization doesn't even seem to match what was observed in video of the actual collapse.  hmmm.

casseia's picture

Wow, MAJOR truther infiltration of this event...

Some guy is asking him about the spherical dust residue and the research of Dr. Jones and it sounds like they were trying to get the mic away from him... more technical difficulties...
Dr. Sunder's reply almost inaudible...

gretavo's picture

but that was stupidity in action

why go into that, when the spherules were not unique to building 7? Why not simply say: did you test for explosive reisdue? And force him to say NO.

casseia's picture

Yes, I agree.

"For the record, Dr. Sunder: did you do ANY tests for explosive or incendiary residue? Yes or no."

casseia's picture

The NIST presentation overall...

... was just an ritual act. Government expert gets up in front of reporters to say, "It was fire. Fire did it. We should make buildings safer." There is no need to offer any kind of persuasive explanation, just to perform the ritual so that it can be cited in the future. "NIST explained it. It was not controlled demolition -- NIST said so. There were no explosions -- NIST said so. NIST explained it." They must have been pretty relieved when they decided to scrap their attempt to actually formulate a scientific explanation and go with a faith-based one instead.

gretavo's picture

NYT comments

one guy said something like "I believe NIST, those guys are top notch" he actually used the term top notch to describe NIST. but to the NYT credit they allowed comments on the article, and there certainly is no shortage of truth comments.

gretavo's picture

NIST answer to explosives and thermite question

Note the evasion here. They say that tests for thermite would have been inconclusive, which isn't likely true or relevant, but they can't even hedge like that for the question of testing for residue of explosives.

Did investigators consider the possibility that an explosion caused or contributed to the collapse of WTC 7?
Yes, this possibility was investigated carefully. NIST concluded that blast events inside the building did not occur and found no evidence supporting the existence of a blast event.

In addition, no blast sounds were heard on the audio tracks of video recordings during the collapse of WTC 7 or reported by witnesses. According to calculations by the investigation team, the smallest blast capable of failing the building’s critical column would have resulted in a sound level of 130 decibels (dB) to 140 dB at a distance of at least half a mile, if unobstructed by surrounding buildings. This sound level is consistent with a gunshot blast, standing next to a jet plane engine, and more than 10 times louder than being in front of the speakers at a rock concert.

For the building to have been prepared for intentional demolition, walls and/or column enclosures and fireproofing would have to be removed and replaced without being detected. Preparing a column includes steps such as cutting sections with torches, which produces noxious and odorous fumes. Intentional demolition usually requires applying explosive charges to most, if not all, interior columns, not just one or a limited set of columns in a building.

Is it possible that thermite or thermate contributed to the collapse of WTC 7?
NIST has looked at the application and use of thermite and has determined that its use to sever columns in WTC 7 on 9/11/01 was unlikely.

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column … presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

It is unlikely that 100 lbs. of thermite, or more, could have been carried into WTC 7 and placed around columns without being detected, either prior to Sept. 11 or during that day.

Given the fires that were observed that day, and the demonstrated structural response to the fires, NIST does not believe that thermite was used to fail any columns in WTC 7.

Analysis of the WTC steel for the elements in thermite/thermate would not necessarily have been conclusive. The metal compounds also would have been present in the construction materials making up the WTC buildings, and sulfur is present in the gypsum wallboard used for interior partitions.

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.html

juandelacruz's picture

"It is unlikely that 100

"It is unlikely that 100 lbs. of thermite, or more, could have been carried into WTC 7 and placed around columns without being detected, either prior to Sept. 11 or during that day."

Not likely unless the building owner and the security detail protecting the building also conspired to let in the demolitions crew to plant the thermite. In which case it would have been a piece of cake. Thankyou Dr. Sunder for implicitly implicating Lucky Larry S. You can both share the same jail cell.

gretavo's picture

anyone have any hot water?

I'm having trouble with the lid on my jar of whoop-ass... I have yet to run into anyone citing this report in defense of WTC7's collapse...

casseia's picture

New York Times article has many comments

Lazlo Toth's picture

What have I been saying all along?

Dr. Shyam Sunder just went and verified my thesis that 9/11 was a frickin’ fifth column Hindoo Job (so the U.S. would then naturally attack the Islamo-fascist, Paki extremists). I’m throwing out all my Ravi Shankar records right now. No more of that twangy-ass music, smelly pagan incense, and no more a that spicy food, or even saag paneer, either. Dr. Sunder with his “we ain’t got no river water to put this out” shit has totally poisoned the well for me. I’m selling my deluxe DVD edition of “Gandhi” as well (the one with all the car chase extras that they left out of the original film).

In Sanskrit, shyam(a) means ‘black’, and sundara or sunder means ‘beautiful’, and so it appears that NIST’s own Dr. Sunder (if that is his real name)—named for the black and beautiful Hindu god Krishna—has decided to continue on his path of doing the will of the Dark Empire by going with the “super hot campfire/tight jar” theory from the Ayahuasca school of cutting edge ideas on hallucinatory structural collapse and improbable chaos theory.

On the bright side though, all of this has given me a great business idea – “Uncle Lazlo’s Campfire Demolitions, Ltd.” We will make a lot of our profits just on the materials end of each job. I mean, how much does a couple of cans of gas and a few Bic lighters cost? We send a couple of our guys out to the site; they light a few floors on fire; wait 8 hours; building comes down into its own footprint; no problemo; and we farm out the messy clean-up part of the job. I think this could really succeed. Eat it, CDI, damn amateurs with all their fancy-ass, over-priced explosives, detonators, proprietary software, and computer shit. What a scam those CDI guys are. At our company, we use the inexpensive, but completely effective, “Silverstein Campfires Method.”

And hey, on the NIST contact sheet, I also noticed that the two info gatekeepers are Ben Stein and Michael Newman, which I just thought was kind of interesting. The Hindus always do this. They always put white Jewish dudes up front so that we will not notice the dark, polytheistic hand of the Ganesh worshippers behind the curtain.

“We decided to pull; no, it was that damn antenna from the north tower; no, it was the carpet (and secret doc) fires and an empty river; no, I was at the dermatologist, or dentist, or somewhere; Roger, Sharon, and Lisa were also at the dentist (Dr. Eisenberg most likely); and no, Odigo didn’t give me any heads up either!”
— Lucky Larry Silverstone (Bedrock, NY)

Thanks so much for the live blog commentary C & G. Will this season of weirdness and surreal treason ever end? I even woke up this morning thinking, “I’ll bet they’re going to go with their very last, and only card, the ‘super-hot campfires’ theory, because a planeload of wild Arab extremists on horseback hijacking a plane and ramming it into WTC7 was taken off the old possible hypothesis table about 7 years ago.

“Just keep lying until these freaks go away.”
— Dr. Sunder’s guru, Swami Treasonananda

kate of the kiosk's picture

Lest i retire without telling you

how much i enjoy your posts, my dear Lazlo!!!

i laughed my b'jeeezsuses off.

so what about your George Harrison DVDs? tossing them too?

is this Dr. "aSunder"  the Perdue dude... tres perdu, n'est-ce-pas?! 

how does he sleep? probably better than I, no doubt, lacking all semblance of conscience.

and speaking of sleep, dagnabbit...i wake up in the middle of the night or early morning trying to trace and differentiate the goings-and-comings  of real semitic judaic folk versus nonsemitic...confused!!! will have to reread your historical eruditic offerings...

would truly semitic jews be more on the sephardic side?

 rest and be well, k

 

juandelacruz's picture

Dr. Sunder should be on the

Dr. Sunder should be on the roster of suspects for crimes against humanity as a primary disinfo peddler in the 9-11 conspiracy.

dicktater's picture

Please move this blog entry to the top of the main page...

... and move my now dated post here:

2 Live News Conferences on Collapse of WTC7
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/1464

down a ways.

--
"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)

Chris's picture

take a look at the the 2

take a look at the the 2 Editors picks comments(the comments the editors see as the most thoughtful and interesting!) on page 3 of the NY Times article comments section, one of them bashes "conspiracy theorists" and the other goes on about Diesel tanks being the culprit:

http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/08/22/nyregion/22wtccnd.html?s=1&pg=3

 fuck the NY Times and their spineless hack editors.

 

Chris's picture

the old "wired for your safety" bit.....

HAHA! take a look at this one from kevin in PA(i cant tell you how many times ive heard this line after basically proving controlled demolition to lemmings):

 Here's what actually happened, despite the many reports to the contrary.

After the 1993 attack on WTC, the local and federal authorities wired the whole complex for demolition in case this should happen again, and the presumption was that another terrorist attack was a safe bet. The benefit outweighed the risk, because if either of the 110 story buildings fell into Manhattan. the death toll would be about 100,000. That was a significant enough potential problem to require a contingency plan.

When the attacks occurred, the idiot-owner of the complex, in a misguided attempt to save lives, "pulled" the buildings when he assumed they were about to fall. Unfortunately they were not about to fall and never would have. Later that day in an attempt to maximize his insurance gains he again "pulled" the 7th building. He even stated this on TV that same night. And he went on to state his reasons, that "there's been so much loss of life already. So I told them to pull it." So he admitted to demolishing an empty building to save lives. Odd, don't you think?

I believe no one knew for certain of the pending terrorist attacks, but several "Americans" people surely profited from them.

http://community.nytimes.com/article/comments/2008/08/22/nyregion/22wtccnd.html?s=1&pg=6

oh no, nobody knew, and Larry isnt a murderer or an accomplice, just a guy who got lucky and made some money. and he just "assumed" the buildings would fall and made an honest mistake. will people really buy this type of shit if/when CD is proven in the court of public opinion and hits critical mass?

 

Chris's picture

.

.

dicktater's picture

UPDATED: Video of the webcast from NIST

Full video of webcast now available. 112MB .FLV

http://agenda911.dk/article.php?story=nistaug2008

http://agenda911.dk/upgeek/nist/nist.flv

***

However, it is only a portion 12:48 in length. It may be updated to the full webcast later. But truthfully, I don't really know. I've had trouble getting a handle on NIST's webcast on Building No. 7.

Available here:

http://agenda911.dk/article.php?story=nistaug2008

Direct link to 25.8 mb FLV file:

http://agenda911.dk/upgeek/nist/nist.flv

--
"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)

Lazlo Toth's picture

Thanks Kate for coming down to the club.

In these times of unprecedented insanity and apocalyptic global conflict under the direction of the decrepit and the certified criminally insane, I am glad I was able to at least make myself laugh (1st order of the day) and provide someone else with a humour break as well. Humour should be an ‘essential’ in anyone’s survival pack for the New World Order Frontier. One thing is for sure though, the WTCD folks are surely packin’ it and will probably survive as militant humourists and shunned social commentators deep into the next phase of food storage/gold-hoarding madness. It is probably our lot in life. And as the old saying goes, “when you’re in the old KBR camps, you can never have too many comedians (or shovels).”

I wouldn’t lose any sleep or rest over the long and complicated travels, exiles, and mixings of the Semitic Hebrew folks, or the peoples who adopted Judaism (the religion) over the centuries, like the Khazars, Yemenis, Arabs, or North African Berbers. Tracing and understanding this history is a full-time job. Did you know that Senator Joseph Biden claims Mesopotamian Judaic ancestry? I know, it never ends, does it? Isn’t he in one of the bands auditioning for the Obama VP gig? In these days and times, always watch the VP’s office. That is where the old “Microsoft backdoor” to Israel operates out of (cf. the “Libby-Cheney shop”). They’ll probably just send Obama out to work on his golf game in the backyard while the real “Business of State” is conducted out of “The Office Down the Hall.”

On the whole Semitic thing, I have never brought this up before, but the category, or term ‘Semite’, ‘Semitic’, can only be truly accepted on a genealogical or ‘racial’ basis if you believe that the story of “Noah and the Ark” is a valid historical event, rather than a Hebrew etiological tale of mythic tribal genealogy, developed and borrowed from the Babylonians during the half century of “Israelite exile” in Mesopotamia. If you believe that there was a hero of “the Great Flood/Deluge” named Noah (originally named in Sumerian and Akkadian - Ziusudra, Utnapishtim, or Atrahasis), and you believe that one of his (Noah’s) sons—the one named Shem—fathered the “Hebrew” and “Arab” tribes, and others, then you believe in a “race” of people known as Shemites or Semites, descendants of Shem, a son of the post-diluvial hero and super-good boat builder, Noah.

As a valid genealogical, biological, or ‘racial’ term, “Semite” is highly imprecise, based as it is upon a mythic history developed by a scribal priestly class. The term is more precisely used when it refers to an identifiable family of ancient Near and Middle Eastern languages. I don’t know if there is any such thing—genetically or genealogically—as a “Semite,” but there is most certainly a family of languages that share a common grammatical and linguistic structure, system, and shared vocabulary which 19th century scholars (under the influence of the Noah story) deemed to be “Semitic,” or “Shemitic.” Although Akkadian, with its high level of Sumerian vocabulary influence, is the earliest written example of these Semitic languages, other examples are biblical Hebrew, Elamite, Arabic, and Aramaic. Other ancient languages used in the creation of religious texts, such as Hurrian, Persian, or Sanskrit were (by grammatical structure and vocabulary) deemed members of the “Indo-Aryan” family. Certain languages in the so-called “Afro-Asiatic” family like ancient Egyptian, for example, also share particular characteristics, and certain vocabulary elements, with western Semitic tongues such as Ugaritic (NW Syria), biblical Hebrew, or Aramaic (of the Aramaean peoples).

I do know one thing for certain, and that is, aside from Budapest’s own Theodor Herzl, “Father of the Zionist Movement,” most of the founders, leaders, and members of the militant “Hebrew underground” (Betar, IZL, LeHI), as well as the more “above-ground” Haganah and Jewish Agency in Palestine—who were all fighting to drive the “Foreign Occupiers” (both British and Arab) from “Their Homeland,”—were either from the Ukraine or Poland, which means that they were of probable (99.99%) Khazarian descent (see: Georgia area), and thus were most likely “Turko-Caucasian,” rather than so-called “Semitic” in the strict Middle Eastern genealogical or linguistic sense. In the Georgian language, ‘ashvili’ has the same meaning as ‘ovitch’ in Yiddish – “son of.” The Georgian minister Kezerashvili (Kezer-ashvili), who speaks fluent Hebrew, bears a surname meaning “son of the Kezer,” showing a Kuzari, or Khazarian and Jewish ancestry.

I also do know that the “Great Spirit” is not in the business of doing contractual real estate deals with ANY tribal confederations on this planet (or on any planet, and/or atomic particle within Infinite EXISTENCE), and therefore the “we are the One True God’s super-chosen tribal confederation, and he gave us this particular chunk of real estate in the Middle East forever and forever” jazz is a COMPLETE FAIRYTALE (125%), and in the age of Nookular-Bio Weapons and drugged out, speed-freak homicidal mercenaries, it is probably just about time to call a Fairytale a Fairytale, and cut all the FKN crap for just this once.

The modern-day adherent or devotee of Judaism (whether “Ashkenazim” or “Sephardim”) has actually (in empirical real world reality) ZERO, as in NO, actual INHERENT DIVINELY MANDATED RIGHT, with regards to Palestine, to be given special settlement rights in, ownership or control of, or the 100% imaginary god-given right to ethnically cleanse, build nukes with stolen U.S. uranium to protect, or any of the other things that have been going on since the Brits got completely duped into, and duplicitously signed (under the pressures of WWI), the Balfour Declaration. Zionism is completely based upon Mythology, not History, or Reality. This is an important historical and human rights point that needs to be emphasized right now, because the edge of the cliff, you know the one, with the 500 ft. drop, is getting mighty close, and the fairytales and bullshit Kabala sorcery tricks are wearing off and wearing oh so very thin. As it is for each and every one of us, it is now also the time for the little trouble-making state of Israel, with all its special, arrogant “privileges and international legal exemptions,” to start walking the “Straight Path” to moral, spiritual, and global redemption. The old, “we get to do a Holocaust on the Palis ‘cause we wuz victims of one too a long time ago” shite ain’t flyin’ no mo’. The bullshit has been called out. The real history has been read and finally understood. It is time to stop the lying. “We know that you know that we know what’s goin’ on.” So how about it? Time to cut the crap, eh?

juandelacruz's picture

Personally I cannot wait for

Personally I cannot wait for AE911truth.org to release their response to this report by the NIST. They said this will come out by Sept 15th.

The NIST request for a response from the public reads as:

NIST welcomes comments on the draft report and recommendations-available online at http://wtc.nist.gov-received by noon Eastern Daylight Time on Sept.15, 2008. Comments may be submitted via:
. e-mail to wtc@nist.gov;
. fax to (301) 869-6275; or
. surface mail to WTC Technical Information Repository, Attn: Stephen Cauffman, NIST, 100 Bureau Dr., Stop 8611, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899-8610.

juandelacruz's picture

The AE911truth.org written

The AE911truth.org official comment to the NIST has not yet been released. But below is a critique by a physics PhD. I don't care for some of the references at the end but overall I think its a good and credible effort to counter Dr. Sunder's misleading report on WTC7.

09/09/08
Dr. Wyndham’s Reply to NIST About Their WTC 7 Final Report
John D. Wyndham, PhD

WTC Technical Information Repository
Attn: Stephen Cauffman,
NIST, 100 Bureau Dr., Stop 8611,
Gaithersburg, Md. 20899-8610.

Dear Sirs:

I have examined the documents¹ you provided on your theory of the collapse of WTC 7 due to fires by way of thermal expansion. It is apparent that you have spent a great deal of time, effort, money and thought on this project.

However, like Ptolemy’s Theory of Epicycles, you begin with a faulty and unproven assumption. It is also the least likely assumption based on the evidence. Therefore, although your computer modeling may be intricate, your results are completely speculative and have no connection with the reality of what happened to that building. You are simply “adding epicycles” to a theory based on a false premise...

URL: http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2008/09/09/dr_wy...

(full comment is also posted at http://www.wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/1538#comment-13426)

juandelacruz's picture

I just saw the same letter

I just saw the same comment on the report posted at 911B

http://www.911blogger.com/node/17578

Jon Gold is nowhere in that thread, I wonder how long he can keep up his stupidity. Somebody should call out teh phony NYC Activist too ;)

Here is another comment on the NIST report

http://the911forum.freeforums.org/withering-critique-of-the-new-wtc7-rep...

gretavo's picture

thanks for all these great links Juan!

It's so easy to forget what the name of this site is sometimes. :)

dicktater's picture

A rare event. A new phenomenon.

And light switch chicanery.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v90RioFSB4M

UPDATED: Video of the webcast from NIST
Submitted by dicktater on Fri, 2008-08-22 13:10.
Full video of webcast now available. 112MB .FLV

http://agenda911.dk/article.php?story=nistaug2008

http://agenda911.dk/upgeek/nist/nist.flv

--
"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)

gretavo's picture

nice vid!

Is Shyam Sunder wearing an American flag lapel pin? How ironic. I wonder if he's even a US citizen, and if he is, when exactly he became one. This man is a liar. And at this point I don't think there can be any question that he is also a criminal. It is remarkable that he used the phrase "a new phenomenon" to think steel frame high rises have been catching on fire for so many decades and it took that long for expanding metal to reveal its destructive potential! Don't worry folks, no one buys this crap anymore, except the very stupid and (at least they claim to) the very dishonest. Pretty much everyone else is on our side.

Tahooey's picture

yes, thank you mr tater, great vid

I think Sunder's reaction is rather telling. Don't address any of the issues. Point to 1000 pages and tell the questioner to read it and then come back. Go into a mantra-like shpiel of "comfortable with it, sound science, consistent with blah, blah, blah" It's like he was trained and practiced these responses to the questions they knew would come.

Meanwhile the policeman says not that the building is about to "fall down" or "collapse", but rather blow up. His tone of certainty and the lack of the words "fall down" counteract the official version that they knew it was "about to collapse from the fires"

gretavo's picture

Shyam Sunder and the Temple of Doom

dicktater's picture

tee, hee, hee

nyuck, nyuck, nyuck.

I hope that you sent this to the good doctor and "The Gage". I'm sure they'll get a nice chuckle or two.

--
"But ruefully, other than explosives having been used, I really, really, really don't have a fucking clue. Until now, we've had trouble getting a handle on a lie big enough for Building No. 7 to satisfy our handlers and their cronies in the media. So, saying it was "a rare event", "a new phenomenon", well that's the best shtik we could come up with, goddamnit. And, whudda fuggin' know? It worked! Fuckin' A it worked, they were all over it. Hell man, they might kill me if they find out that I told you this. Anyway, I need the fucking money to pay the goddamn light bill. Oh and by the way, don't bother reading that fucking report. I didn't. It's real shit. A rare event, a new phenomenon. Haha! What a load of dog shit. Say man, can you lend me five dollars so I can go git some of that fine, fine Queen Bee bar-b-que?"
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - A really bad actor pretending to be Director of Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)