"America's Terror Warâ„¢ - Israel's sole existential hope..."
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_3353.shtml
A million questions with one answer
By Peter Chamberlin
Online Journal Contributing Writer
Jun 10, 2008, 00:12
According to the US State Department, there are approximately a dozen separate anti-Semitic beliefs, the worst of which is the claim that wealthy Jewish-Americans economically control the government, the media, international business or finance.
The other most serious intolerable anti-Semitic claim is that the brutal Israeli repression of the Palestinians is comparable to the fascist tactics that were employed by the Nazis against another Semitic people in Europe.
If anti-Semitism is the spreading of lies about Semitic peoples, and both of these "canards" are proven to be true, then it is the government that is spreading the lies about its ally Israel.
If there is no truth to the charge that Israel is driving America to war against Iran (just as it drove our power-mad leaders to destroy Iraq), then why is it that the craziest American ideas for committing acts of war against Iran (embargoes, blockades and denying Iran the use of its own airspace) all originate in Israel? If most Americans are overwhelmingly against expanding the current limited wars into a regional conflagration, then what explains the bipartisanship in Congress for these small-scale military steps which are clearly intended to cause a major escalation with Iran?
The American majority knows that opening a new war front in Iran would be a major defeat for American forces, having three intolerable consequences: forcing a return of the draft, the devastation of what is left of the American economy and the use of nuclear weapons against civilian populations. The Israeli majority knows this as well, and they are perfectly willing to force their American ally into paying this price for them. Some ally!
If American politicians are not subservient to Israeli interests through the lobby group AIPAC and the financial largesse which they dispense, then how do you explain congressional pursuit of a global war that is desired only by the small vocal Jewish-American minority and their Christian-Zionist supporters (which cannot benefit any nation other than Israel), even though world war is the direct opposite of the clearly expressed will of the majority?
Why have these same politicians supported every Israeli effort to deny the most basic human rights to Palestinians and many other Arabs? Why has Congress supported the suppression of testimony about these victims of Israeli aggression and the violation of countless international laws against the ethnic cleansing committed by Israeli troops while colonizing Palestinian land? Why is there bipartisan support for empowering Israel's attempts to act as vigilante enforcer of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, even though Israel continues to spurn international inspections of its Dimona facility, where Mordechai Vanunu took his infamous secret photos which proved that Israel has illegally violated every international atomic treaty in secretly building hundreds of nuclear weapons?
No other nation in the world can flaunt international law and receive undiminished US support for its continued lawbreaking and the brutal, merciless, fascist-like repression of a victim population the way Israel does. Why does the purported international champion of human rights and the alleged defender of the weak support the criminal abuse of a helpless minority in Palestine and in no other nation?
What is the root of this sentiment, that America must insulate Israel from the consequences of its own actions, even if it is fatal to our republic? Why does this bipartisan commitment to bring war upon the United States permeate both chambers of Congress, where it is echoed by Democrats and Republicans alike? Conspiring with agents of a foreign power to bring war upon the United States matches two of the three definitions of treason given by Dictionary.com:
a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.
the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.
Are we witnessing a perverse Congress that has succumbed to blackmail, or have they merely sold America out for the sake of power and wealth? It does not matter whether Bush and Co. are puppets or parrots for the powerful Jewish-American interests who are driving the war on terror, the fact remains that in this war, Israeli government officials are pulling the strings. Ehud Olmert may as well be calling in the American air strikes himself, as we target the countries which they have named for elimination in the "Clean Break" document, which is nothing more than an updated Zionist version of "Mein Kampf."
American military forces are carrying-out the Zionist "blitzkrieg" against Israel's Arab neighbors, decimating any military forces which could resist the planned Israeli aggression, turning entire nations into refugee populations, conducting a genocidal war of ethnic cleansing on behalf of "God's Chosen People." If modern Israelis were indeed "the Chosen," then there would be no conflict there now, as well as no "Diaspora," since all real Jews would be drawn irresistibly back to the Holy Land. But the Zionist imposters who are waging war against the world are watching their stolen dream collapse around them, as worries about Israeli militancy, water shortages and the comforts of assimilation bring about a negative growth rate, where more people leave Israel than "return" there.
The criminal regime in Tel Aviv is doing everything it can to expand America's terror war, which is seen as Israel's sole existential hope. Mossad agents are working overtime to avoid the inevitable collapse of the racist Zionist vision, as they try every conceivable deception to activate some version of its "Samson option," bringing the rest of the world down around itself and sacrificing the US to empower itself.
Bush, Cheney and nearly the entire Congress are committed to ending the Iranian regime, whatever the costs, before the new president takes office. On June 4, Bush issued a memo to the secretary of state: "I hereby determine that it is necessary, in order to protect the national security interests of the United States, to suspend for a period of six months . . . the process of moving our embassy to Jerusalem."
Moving our embassy would be placing our seal of approval upon an Israeli annexation of Islam's second most holy city, after Mecca. This means that Bush is delaying the implementation of one of the most controversial decisions that any US president has ever made, until after the November 4 United States presidential election, to protect the "national security interests of the United States" (knowing what the effects upon the entire Muslim world will be). Some have interpreted this as Bush's way of bolstering McCain, who also wants to move our embassy, by avoiding compounding Israeli complications for him. This may be part of his motivation for the delay, but knowing the warped reasoning of the current administration, I take this to mean that the drastic actions which Bush plans to take on Israel's behalf at that time will dwarf present concerns about angry Muslim reactions to an embassy move.
Bush's embassy move memo was released while Olmert was meeting with him, trying to persuade him to substitute Israel's own intelligence estimate on Iran's nuclear program for the official US National Intelligence Estimate, which is a product of 16 American agencies. Olmert was in town to attend the AIPAC conference, where he told the audience point blank, why America must wipe Iran from the face of the earth, in order to satisfy Israeli designs for dominating the Middle East: "Iran's fingerprints are evident in almost every terrorist organization across the Middle East, from Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the Gaza Strip to Hizballah in Lebanon . . . [equating the three Islamic resistance groups that oppose Israeli hegemony as "almost every terrorist"].
"The Iranian threat must be stopped by all possible means. International economic and political sanctions on Iran, as crucial as they may be, are only an initial step, and must be dramatically increased . . . urgent need for more drastic and robust measures.
"Sanctions can be imposed on the export of gasoline to Iran . . . [following his previous calls for a naval blockade and declaring Iranian and Syrian air space as "no fly zones"] . . . Israel will not tolerate the possibility of a nuclear Iran."
Christian Americans must ask themselves, "If America does not neutralize Iran at Israel's command, then is America failing God, or is it merely refusing to commit another criminal act for a criminal regime?"
Does America even have a choice in the matter anymore?
To contact Peter Chambelin, click here.
Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor
Top of Page
- gretavo's blog
- Login to post comments
didn't Obomba also want to annex Jerusalem
by moving the American embassy there from Tel Aviv? I hope people realize that there is only one thing we can expect from such a blatantly aggressive (and idiotic) move... namely violent resistance and then a subsequent propaganda campaign to use that violence to justify the move after the fact...
Israel’s Own Historical Sequence of Actions
Form Its Own Existential Threat.
Excellent article! Thanks for the posting, Gretavo. I do agree that Israel should move its seat of governance out of Tel Aviv, but not down to Jerusalem. They should move it to that Texas-sized island of plastic garbage out in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. “An island of garbage for a people that will soon be driven from the land they brutally stole.†And there will indeed be a world war, one where the world will unite to dismantle the number one state sponsor of global terror—Israhell. They can do it peacefully, or they can be subject to round the clock carpet bombing by the awakened armed forces of America at the behest of a citizenry who are just now waking up to the fact that Zionist operatives have repeatedly and fatally attacked the American people, their political leaders (JFK, RFK, et al.), and the men of the armed forces on eight or nine occasions now since the “Lavon Affair†in July of 1954.
The Muslims revere Jesus as a great prophet. They also revere his mother Miriam (Mary) as the mother of a great prophet. The Talmudic Zionists, on the other hand, take great pleasure in describing Mary as a whore and Jesus as a man living in a vat of human excrement somewhere in Hell. Because of this, there is a Christian-Muslim jihad convergence happening now, and for the Zionazis, that ain’t good news at all. In fact, for a tiny minority hanging on by their fingertips to the edge of a karmic cliff, it forms one of their absolute greatest fears (just look at the numbers). This is why they seek, by all means necessary, to sow enmity between the Christian and Muslim worlds, two worlds that are now finding out that they indeed have a lot more in common than they were led to believe. The Crescent and Cross are now in the process of uniting to take down the true enemies of God and the prophets – the sons of Hell who come dressed as “Jews†and allies.
Zionism on the garbage heap of history
Peter Chamberlin, quoted above, wrote about the claim "...that wealthy
Jewish-Americans economically control the government, the media,
international business or finance."
It is implied in the article, and also by the way it is promoted on
this site without a contrary remark or any comment to qualify that
statememt, that somehow the ethnic identityof these wealthy Jewish Americans
, their cultural roots or their religious background is related to
their being positioned at pivotal points of power or controlling nodes
within the structure of the US or global Imperial system.
This idea is wrong, and it must be opposed, clarified, and neutralized at every step.
The truth is that there are many more members of the US and global
Imperial ruling class whose ethnic and cultural origins are
Anglo-American, Euro-American, White Anglo Saxon Protestant (WASP),
plus true blue "All American" members of the master race that hails
from the independent republikkk o' Texas.
The entirety of the US and global Imperial ruling class, regardless of their cultural or ethnic backgrounds are all in on the Zionist campaigns which are very well described and identified by the author above.
Focusing on the ethnic, cultural, or religious background of the
ruling class always confuses the issue, always distracts from our need
to oppose their illegitimate power and is an obstacle in our efforts to
form effective and efficient campaigns of popular resistance that can
help the population overthrow and replace their morally rotten order
that's based on exploitation, misery, extermination and domination.
We need to be able to build alliances of ALL people, of all ethnic
and religious origins, and to cultivate respect and enjoyment of each
others' cultures. The rich and wonderful diversity of humanity's sexual
and gender identities, ethnic, cultural and linguistic identities needs
to be embraced and celebrated. Using one them (in the above case, using
the Jewish American identity) as a target to stir up righteous hatred
against the ruling class is wrong. It must be opposed in order to win the war against that ruling class and all their puppets, and in order to be able to place the Zionist entity one day on the garbage heap of history.
Petros
petros@cyprus-org.net
http://petros-evdokas.cyprus-org.net/Another-sort-of-Introduction.html
~~~~~~~~~~
Liberation - the project for an inclusive process
There will inevitably be a person who (correctly) asks, "well, what the hell should
the damn "morally rotten order that's based on exploitation, misery,
extermination and domination" be replaced with after it is overthrown?
Some pathways to answering that are briefly sketched here:
Liberation - the project for a process of wholistic cum holistic
liberation process inclusive of the quest for freedom on all personal,
social and spiritual realms. Excerpted from
More on the Fake Left
or,
"Left is Right and Right is Wrong
Better decide which side you're on":
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/1182#liberation
"We seek to unite with [all] people ...who, like us, aim for the
re-uniting of all of Humanity's peoples, aim for the destruction of all
borders and the disarming of the armies guarding them, and for the
final overthrow of the governments arming and training them for that
purpose.
We aim for the overthrow of the system of profits and authoritarian
power, and for its replacement by the simple functions of ecological
Direct Democracy: a system of self-administration and self-government
within all of our communities, which are to be run by voluntary
Peoples' Councils at all levels, in the schools, the workplace, the
neighbourhoods, the villages and towns.
We believe that when the influence of the system of profits and of
authoritarian power is removed from both our external and internal
(psychological) world, people everywhere are capable of living as
equals who can respect and honour each other, and who are capable and
willing to make together the major and minor decisions which affect our
everyday lives as neighbours, co-workers, colleagues, friends, lovers,
comrades."
And further:
"...there are many radical Green-minded
individuals and organizations in all the countries of our region ...and
abroad, active in the heartlands of the imperialist countries, who wish
to see our communities re-united again, on the basis of a unity founded
on the global efforts to *replace* the socio -political system of
profits. We believe that our people can be re-united meaningfully only
on the basis of the shared efforts to replace the political system
currently exercised by authoritarian power and capital, with a system
of equality and justice for all, which is founded on co-operation (as
opposed to capitalist competition and exploitation), and founded on
self-government within our communities, instead of government by local
neo-colonialist 'managerial administration teams' appointed by global
and regional capital."
Petros
petros@cyprus-org.net
http://petros-evdokas.cyprus-org.net/Another-sort-of-Introduction.html
~~~~~~~~~~
I am against any sort of
I am against any sort of "government" regardless of who makes it up. I don't think that the authors comments are far from the mark with regards to how foreign policy is being steered however. The policy papers which were proposed by PNAC seem to be getting followed to the letter. What about groups like the office of special plans? What about the pro-Israeli media bias? I wouldn't doubt that there are some WASPS going along with these things. I've been trying to understand how the whole damned Masonic order fits into the big picture with relation to Israel's control. I do know that there is a huge court which was recently built in Israel that is based on masonic symbols. So I don't know how the hell the two are intertwined or if one group is more dominant than another. What I do know is that there are certain things that appear to benefit the government of Israel while harming the government in the US which does have Zionists and Masons spread through out. I don't know if the Mason's are going along with these things or if the society has been steered in a specific direction due to being infiltrated as I have read in "Pawns in the Game".
All I care about is that a taboo is being broken, finally, by more and more authors in the US to discuss this issue of Israeli government influence. The Israeli government is known to use blackmail to exert control over politicians in this country so I see no problem in pointing this fact out. As far as I'm concerned I doubt I will ever see the kind of world that I want to see simply because of human behavior. No ruling classes should exist and no human should coerce others to do as they desire. America is about to become the Germany of WWII and rather than getting into it in detail because too many have been conditioned as to what that role was I will leave it at that. The nuts at the top of the various social (nation-state and secret society) structures recycle their game plans and it's there for any one who does the research.