more bollyn, ah poor brits, just like us...regarding Milliband finally!

- kate of the kiosk's blog
- Login to post comments
|
|
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 42 guests online.
User loginNavigationFeatured Content WTCD Wiki WTCD Compendium WTCD Podcasts Glossary 9/11 TV News Archive 9/11 Unveiled by Enver Masud David Chandler's YouTube Channel Council for the National Interest Popular Mechanics: Money Masters Orwell Rolls in His Grave Reel Bad Arabs Recent blog posts
WTCD User Comments
|
more bollyn, ah poor brits, just like us...regarding Milliband finally!![]() »
|
PollCan Maduro get a fair trial from Alvin Hellerstein? Of course, Judge Hellerstein is a jurist with integrity. 0% No, Judge Hellerstein works on behalf of the Zionist deep state. 0% Whether he does or not is irrelevant, Maduro is part of the op. 0% He will be bribed into pleading guilty to something minor. 100% Other (specify in comments.) 0% Total votes: 1
Disqus Comments |
The usual crap from Jew-haters
David Bollyn, the author of this article promoted above without any qualifications or critique, is a former member of the Jew-hating organization named "American Free Press" which is a subsidiary of the "Barnes Review", both of them owned and controlled by the "All American" neo nazi Lyndon Larouche.
In the article, the "proofs" of zionism quickly degenerate into tracing peoples' family roots, and prooving that they are Jewish. As always, it boils down to genetics.
Also, there's the usual and very interesting twist about linking Marxism with Jewishness, both depicted as "enemies".
David Bollyn left (or was fired from) the Jew-hating "American Free Press" when he joined some voices in accusing the "American Free Press"
of not hating Jews enough, and therefore "being controlled by
Zionists". He, another Jew-hater named Eric Hufschmid, and another
group of Jew-haters known as Wing TV have it all out, accusing each
other of being "controlled by Zionists". Here:
http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/bollynthorn.html
You can see some more about them here:
http://www.911review.com/denial/holocaust.html
Associating with any of them, David Bollyn, Eric Hufschmid, Wing TV and
the American Free Press, drunk to the bone on hate-politics as they
are, makes it impossible to critique zionism in a credible way, or to fight against zionism honorably.
Their work has no place here except it is accompanied by clear and loud denunciations of hate-based politics.
Petros Evdokas
petros@cyprus-org.net
http://petros-evdokas.cyprus-org.net/Another-sort-of-Introduction.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think Bollyn has done
I think Bollyn has done important contributions to the truth movement as a journalist. He is not perfect however and I often find his opinions and analysis to be reaching. He has done what he could to disassociate himself from Hufschmidt who seems to have a real hidden agenda to smear the truth movement.
I agree with you that Bollyn is sometimes loose with attributing conspiracies to Jews which is inappropriate.
While this site has occasionally shown some of Bollyn's material when they did offer good ideas it has been very critical of him as well. There was a time when Bollyn was regarded as nothing more than a disinfo person at this site.
maybe, maybe not
anti-Jewish (will refrain from "Jew-hater"). i seem to recall interviews where he spoke about his having lived in Israel for a while and even having been married to an Israeli..whatev. I do think he harbors anger...being tasered and assaulted infront of his family and then brought before a pro-zionist judge did not help.
his research has been valuable. and if he does seem to digress into tracing Jewish lineage, and if that digression is to prove that some of these folks are not really who they purport to be but are Christian Zionists or Jewish Zionists/dual citizens, and place the security of Israel above the nations in which they serve and hold key positions...well then, thank you, Christopher!Â
personally, i have many Jewish friends for whom i have high regard. the subject of 9/11 has been difficult, but we're working it through, slowly, delicately. I fear for them in that less they call it themselves, there will be a severe backlash. Â
and, regarding Miliband
i recall thinking last year when he first slipped into power what is going down here...another pro-israel dual citizen! where is the balance? why is it always jewish dual nationals? why not  muslims? or christians in a christian nation, for chrize sake...
Hi Kate, Petros seems to
Hi Kate,
Petros seems to have been harassed as well by the police on the instigation of the CIA.
Oops, a typo...
I hope it's obvious that I meant to write the name "Christopher Bollyn"
where I wrote "David Bollyn", in the Comment above titled
The usual crap from Jew-haters:
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/1165#comment-11127
I got his name mixed up with David Dees' first name - I was writing about David Dees in the article titled
It's beyond "artistic interpretation":
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/1166
I have a "good excuse" though, I hope you'll accept it. You know how it
is with the first names of all these racists and supremacists, right? David
Dees, David Duke, David Horowitz, what's the difference, right? Sometimes they
just "...all look the same".
Petros
________
another racist david
is David Yerushalmi, former business partner of our kafkaesque friend Larry Silverstein (top campaign contributor to gender neutral presidential candidate Hillary Clinton). This David, aside from promoting Ayn Rand Lands in Israel also dedicates himself to exposing the Islamofascist menace...
http://www.mappingsharia.us/Project-Team-category-75.htm
Anyway, thanks again for stirring the pot here, Petros--if nothing else you are helping us combat groupthink in our midst. My own take on Bollyn is that he provides some sorely needed analysis and reporting, but as is the case with so many in this crazy movement, comes with a lot of drama. I am as yet not convinced that he isn't an actor in all of this, whose role is to look a bit and maybe even sound a bit like David Duke, then be put on CNN in order for people to draw "their own" conclusions about the validity of his "Zionist-heavy" focus, preferably in interviews sandwiched between stories about Ahmedinejad and Duke himself. I of course have no proof of this, just my gut telling me to tread carefully. But a great deal of his research seems to check out, so one does what one can and soldiers on through the thicket of deception.
Anyway I would hope that you would acknowledge that for all their faults racists are people too, and that any time we give up on people we are essentially validating their sadly misguided points of view. And then there's the fact that many people who are absolutely not racists just have a different threshold of tolerance for off-color humor. That is to say that while no, racism is not welcome on this site, we like to keep the table open to controversial things to be discussed by people with a range of views in a civil manner. What we are after is a meeting of minds, not a clash of ideologies--the idea being that we all have something to learn from or about "the other", things that ideally help make us better equipped to heal our troubled planet.
It takes a village to expose a cover-up!
911review are not very credible, btw
Here's something I puleld from the link Petros provided. A few issues--is 911review suggesting that the first three stories mentioned are inaccurate? It seems like it. Also, 911review is in the minority when it comes to what actually happened at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania. That they cite Bollyn's "mainstream truther" positions as "proof of his promotion of hoaxes" is pretty funny and says more, I think, about whoever is behind 911review...
Christopher Bollyn
Christopher Bollyn, writing for the American Free Press, was the source of numerous original stories on the 9/11 coverup. Bollyn -- whose prolific work suggests he is a hard-working reporter -- was the apparent source of numerous stories including:
Apparently because of his original reporting, Bollyn's work has been widely cited and copied. Unfortunately, this is also true of a number of hoaxes that Bollyn has promoted -- perhaps unknowingly.
true...never liked 911review from the get-go
thanks, G
until we have an alternative...
I will welcome Bollyn's insights. I'm curious as to who Petros thinks it's OK to get information from? Wolf Blitzer for example is clearly an Arab-Muslim hater, as is Noam Chomsky, if one judges by their support of the Arab-Muslim 9/11 Libel. In fact we are pretty much living in a society where Arab-Muslim-hating (in the form of support of the 9/11 Libel) is a requirement for being a) a politician, b) a professional journalist, c) a talk show host, etc.
I wonder why so many allegedly progressive Jewish personalities like Chomsky, Goodman, Jon Stewart, Bill Maher, Norman Finkelstein, Al Franken, etc. are supporters of the Arab-Muslim-hating 9/11 Libel? It would be great if they didn't, and if they chose instead to expose the role that AIPAC and Zionism play in the big bad American Imperial project because then we wouldn't have to look for information from alleged Jew-haters. Because honestly, if I have to keep choosing between Jew-haters and Arab-Muslim-haters and the former are at least telling the truth about 9/11, well then, can you blame me?