Is Alex Jones' "Police State" Fearmongering a Ploy to Protect Israeli Spies?

It's all starting to make a lot of sense.  The fear of "government surveillance" promoted by fake truthers like Alex Jones AND by the fake controlled left is a gift to real terrorists and spies.  Those who think that the real terrorists are actually Arab or Muslim will be divided on these measures depending on where they fall on the fake left/right blue/red spectrum.  The reds will say they will trade freedom for security against arab muslims, the blues will say that their civil liberties are important to them and that racial profiling is wrong.

Both, of course, miss the point.  As we have seen in the past several years, the real national security threat facing America is the actions of Israel and its lobby spying on and stealing secrets from the US government, not only to advance the Zionist goal of hegemony in the middle east but also to protect the Israeli-supported international crime syndicates that traffic in everything from people to drugs.  Recall the censored Fox News story by Carl Cameron.  Recall the various spy scandals implicating Israel and AIPAC.

Could it be that what has been perceived as the Bush admin's aggressive response to 9/11 has in fact been at least in part a genuine and necessary response to what we know really happened on 9/11?  Have the increased security measures served to deter, in addition to fake plots like the Liberty City Seven's grandiose scheme to blow up the Sears Tower, real threats against Americans' security originating from its fake "ally" Country A?

And could it be that just as the neocon Michael Savages are the Zionist puppets on the right, the ACLU and others are the equivalent on the left, serving to fight against the measures that need to be taken in order to flush out the spies among us?  And is Alex Jones the equivalent on the "truther" side of the spectrum?

Note the bold text below, and by all means read the entire article.  What is it a response to?  Who was that US sailor convicted in March?  Was that the same guy who we remember being caught a while back who authorities were shy about revealing the country he was spying for?  And could it be that his conviction came and went so quietly because like everything involving Country A, it was benignly neglected by the American media?

Domestic spying far outpaces terrorism prosecutions - Los Angeles Times

 >snip<

By contrast, the Justice Department reported last month that the nation's spy court had granted 2,370 warrant requests by the department to search or eavesdrop on suspected terrorists and spies in the U.S. last year -- 9% more than in 2006. The number of such warrants approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has more than doubled since the 2001 terrorist attacks.

>snip<

Certainly, the government has pursued a number of high-profile terrorism cases of late. A U.S. sailor was convicted in March of providing support to terrorists by passing classified information regarding movements of a Navy battle group to operators of an Internet site suspected of terrorist leanings.

The record in court has been somewhat mixed, however. Federal prosecutors in Miami twice have failed to secure verdicts in the cases of six men accused of plotting to destroy Chicago's Sears Tower and several FBI offices. After two mistrials, the "Liberty City Seven" case is due in court in January.