When you apologized to Jon Gold at 9/11 blogger,did you really have no better way to respond to this?

Sorry...

But the individuals that post on WTCD do not care about this cause. They care more about me than this cause. Reprehensor did the right thing by banning those individuals. Perhaps loosenuke can post, again, the site where Reprehensor explained himself. All I know is that it wasn't censorship. It was being responsible.

I'll accept your apology, but listen to every word in this interview.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? The facts speak for themselves.
Submitted by Jon Gold on Thu, 01/14/2010 - 9:13pm.
»

Good, I'm glad you accept.

One of the things that leads to tempers boiling which can result in negative personal things being said, is the inability to agree to disagree.

When people disagree to disagree, nothing productive ensues.

When people agree to disagree, things can move forward.

The fact that I have an account at WTCD does NOT mean I endorse or support everything that's posted there. But other people have posted some good stuff there. It was there, for example, that I found out about Rodriguez' story of seeing one of the hijackers in the WTC months before the attacks, which I suspect might be ground work for the fall back of "al Qaeda planted the explosives."

Incidentally, Paul Tassopulos e-mailed me the link to the Roberts - Gold interview a few nights ago before it was posted here, and I have listened to the whole thing.

In principle, I absolutely agree with you that "bad info" should not be promoted. Where we have so far "disagreed to disagree" is on what we consider bad info. Because you're so positive in your own mind that CIT is "disinfo" and that anyone defending them should be automatically suspect, which would include me, this has led to tensions. You have accused my defense of CIT's work as "tacking on years to this cause." It is of course your right to believe this and my right to disagree.

Once again, agreeing to disagree is a good thing and absolutely necessary when working within a large movement which is bound to have many different points of view and differences of opinion.

After all, anyone who watched Jesse Ventura's final episode last night knows that all of us only have 2 more years to live anyway. ;-)
Submitted by Adam Syed on Thu, 01/14/2010 - 10:29pm.
»

As far as I'm concerned...

Anyone that brings attention to that site should not be trusted. Period. Since you have been shown countless times by me, Erik, and others that the information you are promoting with regards to CIT is "bad info," and still continue to promote it, I have to question your intentions. I do not trust you Adam. I accepted your apology because it is the "right thing to do," but that doesn't mean I think you should continue doing what you're doing. Please STOP what you're doing, because it's not helping, and it's taking up valuable time that could be better spent elsewhere.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? The facts speak for themselves.
Submitted by Jon Gold on Fri, 01/15/2010 - 9:01am.