Home ยป WOW! Informed, Reasoned Analysis of the CIT/Pentagon Debate - Thanks to Robin Hordon

gretavo's picture

i disagree

Submitted by gretavo on Tue, 2010-07-20 01:10.

"whereas even proving demolitions at the WTC still leaves that part of the narrative unchanged"

The fact that the buildings were wired for demnolition before 9/11 means that somebody must have been damn sure that those planes were going to hit their targets, and they could not have been certain enough of that if a bunch of first time flyers had been at the controls.

A Pentagon flyover on the other hand allows believers in the hijacking myth to still say "well, if AA77 flew over the Pentagon and met some different fate than we thought, it was still hijacked and still "obviously" was somehow destroyed. On the other hand if there was *no* flyover, and *no* impact with the Pentagon, it would suggest that AA77 didn't even exist except maybe on paper, as a flase radar blip, and in a media narrative.

»

Reply