...to me, at first glance it looks as if a bomb or group of bombs went off inside the Pentagon--in the area where presumably a lot of "renovation work" had been taking place, you know, with areas sealed off and things installed out of sight? The presence of an unrealistically small number of plane parts in the debris does not support the claim that a Boeing 757 flew into that building. The complete absence of damage to the lawn outside the building supports the conclusion that neither a Boeing 757 nor ANY kind of plane flew into the Pentagon. The horizontal position of some lamp posts after the explosion does not prove the claim that a 757 flew into the building. The claim of 10 eyewitnesses who say they saw a plane fly north of the CITGO station also does not prove that a Boeing 757 flew into the Pentagon. It may support the claim that there was a plane in the area that flew over the Pentagon, it may explain why some people are mistakenly convinced that a plane flew into the Pentagon, but it has little to do with what DID happen at the Pentagon (as opposed to what DIDN'T), which is why our focus should be on what did happen there. Who here knows ANYTHING about the renovations that were supposed to have been done at the Pentagon leading up to 9/11, like who was contracted to do the work? Anyone? That's the kind of knowledge we are NOT gaining when we are distracted by excessive talk over what did NOT happen.