You make a good point, Juan
Submitted by Keenan on Tue, 2010-07-20 00:17.
I'm also not convinced that there would necessarily have to be a crater for there to have been some sort of explosive destruction of the plane in the air that could be from any number of kinds of explosive devices, rather than just one big crater-causing explosion. Also, doesn't it depend on how far from the ground the plane would have to be for the explosion to cause a crater? Seems to me that it is not such a simple open and shut case that there couldn't have been any sort of in-air explosion(s).
I think we can all agree that the plane was not hugging the ground like the obviously doctored 5 video frames that were released by the Pentagon seem to indicate.
»
WTCD User Comments
9 years 43 weeks ago
10 years 5 weeks ago
10 years 20 weeks ago
10 years 44 weeks ago
10 years 45 weeks ago
10 years 47 weeks ago
11 years 2 weeks ago
11 years 2 weeks ago
11 years 2 weeks ago
11 years 2 weeks ago