Home ยป WOW! Informed, Reasoned Analysis of the CIT/Pentagon Debate - Thanks to Robin Hordon

gretavo's picture

oh I see...

Submitted by gretavo on Mon, 2010-07-19 20:35.

"The fact that you think it's a "waste of time and energy" to discuss evidence this strong and important is even more perplexing, as that seems to be the same reaction to this info that I have seen from the folks over at truthaction."

I should really be more careful in ensuring that I not agree with anything that anyone at truthaction believes--thanks for the tip!

So, tell us Nipster--let's say everyone here decided they agreed with you that yes, absolutely, the plane that the CIT witnesses saw that morning didn't hit the Pentagon, but flew over it. What now? How is that going to be any more convincing to people who can't tell from simply looking at the "crash site" that no big Boeing crashed into the Pentagon?

Aren't they simply going to say "well look, you may be right that some people saw a plane that flew over the Pentagon, but since we know that AA77 hit the Pentagon, those other people clearly saw a different plane."

So please, just pretend everyone agrees and go from there, so we can see why it's so important that everyone agree with the flyover inference.

»

Reply