Home ยป WOW! Informed, Reasoned Analysis of the CIT/Pentagon Debate - Thanks to Robin Hordon

nipster's picture

But no one reported a smaller military aircraft

Submitted by nipster on Mon, 2010-07-19 18:59.

Whether or not it was "painted to look like AA77" is also in question (although this could be the case), but I don't believe I said it had to be a 757, or that the witnesses would be able to tell exactly what type of plane it was. But they DO describe it as a large jet that looked to be a commercial airliner, and this is corroborated by all of them. I'm trying to figure out what you mean here: is your argument that the difference in exactly how large it was compared to a 757 could possibly allow it to approach north of the CITGO in a relatively slow moving significant right bank - as described by the witnesses - while missing all light poles, the generator trailer, the C-ring hole, and almost completely disintegrating without causing a crater in the ground or in the Pentagon foundation? If you think that is a viable consideration, then I am going to have to disagree, sorry.

»

Reply