Quotations from the Rabbis of His Satanic Zionist Majesty

The European and American descendents of the pagan Kuzari or Khazar tribes from southern Russia who converted to Judaism roughly 1268 years ago in the mid 8th century CE (1) have been given justification for their support of the military appropriation and occupation of the land of Palestine through texts such as Nachmanide’s (1194-1270) commentary on Maimonides’ (1135-1204) Book of Commandments:

“We are commanded to inherit the land that God gave to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and must not leave it in the hands of any other nation.... We must not leave the Land in the hands of the [seven Canaanite nations] or of any other people in any generation.”

Rabbi Zvi Yehudah Kook, the spiritual mentor of the militant Israeli settler cult known as Gush Emunim, commented on the above exegesis by Nachmonides, saying:

“These are explicit words of halakha [Jewish Law].... The main thrust of the commandment is conquest by the state, Jewish national rule in this holy territory.”(2)

In a public statement made in 1968, Rabbi Kook explained the mentally delusional position of the ‘religious Zionist’ (as opposed to the ‘secular Zionist’):

“I tell you explicitly that the Torah forbids us to surrender even one inch of our liberated land. There are no conquests here and we are not occupying foreign lands; we are returning to our home, to the inheritance of our ancestors. There is no Arab land here, only the inheritance of our God—and the more the world gets used to this thought the better it will be for them and for all of us” (“Year by Year,” 1968).(3)

Under the same delusions of myth and imaginary history, Rabbi Kook continues:

“We find ourselves here by virtue of the legacy of our ancestors, the basis of the Bible and history, and no one can change this fact. What does it resemble? A man left his house and others came and invaded it. This is exactly what happened to us. Some argue that there are Arab lands here. It is all a lie and a fraud! There are absolutely no Arab lands here....”(4)

Furthermore, Rabbi Shlomo Aviner, the former rabbi of Bet El, a Jewish settlement in the Occupied West Bank, is under the impression that the Arabs who came to settle in the land—100 years before the Khazars or Kuzari had given up their idols and converted to Judaism in c. 740 CE, I might add—are thieves, squatters, and criminals. I will let him explain:

“Let me draw you an analogy. It’s as if a man goes into his neighbor’s house without permission and stays there for many years. When the original owner returns, the invader claims: ‘It’s my house, I’ve been living here for years!’ All of these years he’s been nothing but a thief! Now he should make himself scarce and pay rent on top of it. Some people might say that there’s a difference between living in a place for thirty years and living in a place for 2,000 years. Let us ask them: Is there a statute of limitations that gives a thief the right to his plunder?...

“Everyone who settled here knew very well that he was living in a land that belongs to the people of Israel, so the ethnic group that settled in this place has no title to the land. Perhaps an Arab who was born here doesn’t know this, but nevertheless the fact that a man settles on land does not make it his. Under the law, possession serves only as a proof of a claim of ownership; it does not create ownership. The Arabs’ possession of the land is therefore a possession that asserts no rights. It is the possession of territory when it is absolutely clear that they are not its legal owners, and this possession has no juridical or moral validity.”(5)

Rabbi Aviner strongly believes all this, of course, because he is under the deep mythic delusion that an imaginary Canaanite deity named YHWH had, c. 1200 BCE, bequeathed a piece of real estate stretching from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates River unto the tribal ancestors of the Byzantine rabbis who converted Rabbi Aviner’s own Kuzari ancestors to Judaism in c. 740 CE. Rabbi Aviner, naturally, has yet to show any international court of law the actual real estate contract that the mythical deity YHWH signed and handed over to Moses, another literary character from the Torah, whose birth story was closely based on the birth story of the Mesopotamian king, Sargon the Great of Akkad, interestingly enough.

With regards to the deluded notions of fake Zionist rabbis like Shlomo Aviner and others on land rights and private property, Yehoshafat Harkabi, a Professor Emeritus of International Relations and Middle East Studies at Hebrew University of Jerusalem, writes in his Israel’s Fateful Hour:

“In generations past, the fundamental concept of being the Chosen People served the Jews as a shield against persecution and a consolation in distress. Since 1967 it has taken on an aggressive significance as a license to act in contradiction to accepted political norms. The idea of being ‘a people that dwells apart, not reckoned among the nations’ (Numbers 23:9) has become sanctioned for deviant behavior in the international arena. International law, public opinion, the United Nations, the superpowers—for the religious extremists none of these matter. In the world at large, religion cannot provide legal title to a territory. But for those religious extremists who believe it does, the biblical promise of the Land of Israel for the people of Israel is transformed from a religious and spiritual matter into a necessity that requires immediate implementation....In the world view of the religious extremists...as they see it, the Arabs lived in the land throughout the centuries in contravention to the Law, and their assertion of a right of residence is no better than that of a squatter.”(6)

“YOU SHALL DISPOSSESS ALL THE INHABITANTS OF THE LAND.” (Numbers 33:53)

Rashi, a Jewish scholar of the 11th century, explained that this passage meant, “You shall drive out of the land and you shall dispossess it of its inhabitants, and then you will dwell in it, i.e. you will be able to remain in it [if you dispossess it of its inhabitants], but if not, you will not be able to remain in it.”(7)

On the topic of YHWH’s commandment to his “chosen people” to go and dispossess the Canaanites of their lands and put them all to the sword, Rabbi Yisrael Ariel comments:

“On the one hand there is a commandment to settle Eretz Israel, defined by our sages also as the commandment of ‘inheritance and residence’—a commandment mentioned many times in the Torah. Even the new student understands that ‘inheritance and residence’ means conquering and settling the land. The Torah repeats the commandment—‘You shall dispossess all the inhabitants of the land’—many times, and Rashi explains that this means to expel them. The Torah itself uses the term expulsion a number of times.... The substance of this commandment is to expel the inhabitants of the land whoever they may be.... This is also how Rashi understands the commandment. In the Talmudic passage that mentions the commandment to settle the land, Rashi explains: ‘Because of the commandment to settle Eretz Yisrael—to expel idol worshippers and settle Jews there.’ Thus according to Rashi, the commandment to settle the land means to expel the non-Jew from Eretz Yisrael and settle it with Jews.”(8)

On one of his favorite topics, “The Final Solution to the Arab Problem,” Rabbi Meir Kahane once wrote:

“The Arabs of Israel are a desecration of God’s name. Their non-acceptance of Jewish sovereignty over the Land of Israel is a rejection of the kingdom. Removing them from the land is therefore more than a political matter. It is a religious matter, a religious obligation to wipe out the desecration of God’s name [i.e. the Arabs]. Instead of worrying about the reactions of the Gentiles if we act, we should tremble at the thought of God’s wrath if we do not act. Tragedy will befall us if we do not remove the Arabs from the land, since redemption can come at once in its full glory if we do as God commands us.... Let us remove the Arabs from Israel and hasten the Redemption.”(9)

EXPEL ALL NON-JEWS FROM JERUSALEM
As Rabbi S. D. Wolpe explains:
“According to halakha [Jewish law] it is forbidden for a non-Jew to live in Jerusalem, and in accordance with the ruling by Maimonides, it is forbidden to permit even a resident alien in Jerusalem.... True, this applies when Israel has the upper hand, but today too, although it is not possible to expel them by force, this does not mean that we have to encourage them to live there!”(10)

As Rabbi Eliezer Waldenberg explains:
“It is forbidden for gentiles to live in Jerusalem. I, for example, favor upholding the halakhic prohibition on a gentile’s living in Jerusalem. If we would uphold this halakha as we should, we would have to expel all non-Jews from Jerusalem and purify it absolutely.”(11)

BLOT OUT THE MEMORY OF THE DEMON TRIBE OF AMALEK
There are several Zionist extremists posing as rabbis who often identify the Arab peoples with the demonic Amalek figure mentioned in Deuteronomy 25:17-19. This is the entity or tribe that Jews were commanded by YHWH to annihilate. It is also ironic and interesting that the anti-Zionist rabbis of the early 20th century often compared the Zionists to Amalek.

Deuteronomy 25:17-19 –
“Remember what Amalek did to you on your journey after you left Egypt—how, undeterred by fear of God, he surprised you on the march, when you were famished and weary, and cut down all the stragglers in your rear. Therefore, when the Lord your God grants you safety from all your enemies around you, in the land that the Lord your God is giving you as a hereditary portion, you shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven. Do not forget!”(12)

The Commandment of Genocide in the Torah
Published in the February 26, 1988 edition of Bat Koll, the student newspaper at Bar Ilan University, was an article written by the former campus rabbi of this institution, Rabbi Yisrael Hess. His article was entitled “The Commandment of Genocide in the Torah.” He ends this cheery piece by saying, “The day will yet come when we will all be called to fulfill the commandment of the divinely ordained to destroy Amalek.” Knesset member Amnon Rubinstein quoted this article before the Knesset, saying: “Rabbi Hess explains the commandment to blot out the memory of Amalek and says that there is no mercy in this commandment: the commandment is to kill and destroy even children and infants. Amalek is whoever declares war against the people of God.”

In this same article Rabbi Hess alludes to the idea that the Arabs of the modern age are Amalek:

“Against this holy war God declares a counter jihad.... In order to emphasize that this is the background for the annihilation and that this is what the war is all about, that it is not merely a conflict between two peoples.... God does not rest content that we destroy Amalek—‘blot out the memory of Amalek’—he also mobilizes personally for this war...because, as has been said, he has a personal interest in the matter, it is a prime goal for us as well.”(13)

ON THE KILLING OF NON-JEWS
In the mid-1980s Rabbi Yisrael Ariel wrote a series of articles to justify the murders being committed against Palestinians by the militant Zionist underground groups among the settlers that were (and still are) operating at the time. In Israel’s Fateful Hour Professor Yehoshafat Harkabi cites one of those articles where Rabbi Yisrael Ariel writes:

“Anyone who looks through the code of Maimonides, which is the pillar of halakha in the Jewish world, and searches for the concept ‘thou shall not murder’ or the concept ‘holy blood’ with regard to the killing of a non-Jew will search in vain, because he will not find it.... It follows from Maimonides’ words that a Jew who killed a non-Jew was exempt from human judgment, and has not violated the prohibition on murder. As Maimonides writes in the Laws of Murderers: ‘A Jew who killed a resident alien is not sentenced to death by a court of law.’”(14)

This is exactly what happens when you have a religion created by a bunch of fucking lawyers.

ZIONIST TOTALITARIANISM
Concerning the treatment of non-Jews living in a land that has been conquered and has come under Jewish rule, Maimonides’ “Laws of Kings” forms a major source of halakha for most of these above-mentioned rubber room rabbis. In the August 13, 1983 issue of Ha’aretz Rabbi Meir Kahane explained how Jewish colonialism works for non-Jews living in the Zionist Kingdom:

“A non-Jew who lives in the Land of Israel can obtain only the status of ‘resident alien’. Citizenship, political status...the right to vote and hold office, all these are reserved exclusively for Jews.”

Rabbi Meir Kahane also further explained how Zionism is actually antithetical to democracy:

“There is an absolute and irresoluble contradiction between the State of Israel...and the modern nation-state that sees all of its citizens as possessing equal rights.... There is a potential confrontation...between the Zionist Jewish State...and modern ideas of democracy and citizenship.”(15)

On the treatment of non-Jews, i.e. Arab Christians and Muslims, conquered by the dark armies of Zion, Rabbi Meir Kahane refers to Maimonides’ “Laws of Kings” (Hilkhot Melakhim, 6:1), saying:

“If the inhabitants make peace and accept the Seven Commandments enjoined upon the descendants of Noah, none of them is slain, but they become tributary, as it is said: ‘They shall become tributary unto thee, and shall serve thee’ (Deuteronomy 20:11). If they agree to pay the tribute levied on them but refuse to submit to servitude, or if they yield to servitude but refuse to pay the tribute levied on them, their overtures are rejected. They must accept both terms of peace. The servitude imposed on them is that they are given an inferior status, that they lift not up their heads in Israel but be subjected to them, but they be not appointed to any office that will put them in charge of Israel. The terms of the levy are that they be prepared to serve the king with their body and their money.”(16)

These ideas have been further elucidated upon by Dr. Mordechai Nisan, a lecturer on the Middle East at Hebrew University of Jerusalem:

“The category of ben-noah [‘son of Noah’] defines the non-Jew who has accepted the seven Noachide laws. In return for being permitted to live in the country of sacred history and religious purpose, the ben-noah must accept to pay a tax and to suffer the humiliation of servitude (see Deuteronomy 20:11). Maimonides, in his legal code on the Laws of Kings, states explicitly that he [the non-Jew] be ‘held down and not to raise his head against Jews.’ Non-Jews must not be appointed to any office or position of power over Jews. If they refuse to live a life of inferiority, then this will signal rebellion and the unavoidable necessity of Jewish warfare against their very presence in the Land of Israel....”(17)

On this statement, Professor Yehoshafat Harkabi has commented:

“If Canada, of which he was formerly a citizen, treated Dr. Nisan as a ben-noah, a member of the servant class with restricted rights, he would have protested it as deplorable discrimination, but he sees no contradiction in the Jews, as the chosen people, having a license to treat non-Jews in just this way. This is tribal morality given theological justification. I do not know how many Jews share his belief, but the publication of his article in a leading Zionist periodical is cause for great concern.”(18)

Dr. Harkabi finishes his discussion on these matters and extremist attitudes by calling for Jews to break their conspiracy of silence about these things and begin an honest discussion:

“A conspiracy of silence about these beliefs and this use of the [Jewish] tradition allows them to go unchallenged and encourages those who propagate them. There can be no remedy without first identifying the problem. By hiding our shame from outsiders we hide it from ourselves as well. The Torah says many times, ‘You shall sweep out the evil from your midst.’ At the very least we must cry out against it.”(19)

(1) The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. John Bowker (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1997, pp. 511, 545.

See: Judah Halevi’s 12th century work Sefer ha-Kuzari [“The Book of the Kuzari”], translated into English in 1945 by H. Hirschfeld.

(2) Quoted in Yehoshafat Harkabi, Israel’s Fateful Hour. New York: Harper & Row. 1988, p. 144.

(3) Ibid. p. 145.

(4) Ibid. p. 146.

(5) Ibid. p. 146.

(6) Ibid. p. 145.

(7) Ibid. p. 147.

(8) Ibid. pp. 147-48.

(9) Ibid. p. 148.

(10) Ibid. p. 149.

(11) Ibid. p. 149.

(12) Tanakh: The Holy Scriptures – The New JPS Translation According to the Traditional Hebrew Text – Torah, Nevi’im, Kethuvim. Philadelphia & Jerusalem: The Jewish Publication Society. 1985, p. 313.

(13) Quoted in Yehoshafat Harkabi, Israel’s Fateful Hour. New York: Harper & Row. 1988, pp. 149-50.

(14) Ibid. p. 150.

(15) Ibid. p. 182.

(16) Ibid. pp. 151-52.

(17) Ibid. p. 154.

(18) Ibid. p. 154.

(19) Ibid. p. 182.