Where Was Harvard While America Slept?

gretavo's picture

President Bok Feigns Misunderstanding

Misinterprets request to review work of 9/11 Prof
with request to review all work of all Profs

Published On Friday, October 27, 2006 4:35 AM

A request for President Bok to review the teaching of
Professor of History Ernest May on the subject of the
events of September 11th was misunderstood by the
president to mean that he should review all the work of
all Harvard professors.

Professor May, who teaches a freshman seminar on the
9/11 Commission and its report, to which he served as
a senior adviser, teaches the Commission's findings as
historical fact, when the contents of the report have
been thoroughly discredited by the work of such
scholars as Professor David Ray Griffin in his book
Omissions and Distortions of the 9/11 Commission
Report.

The text of President Bok's comments are below, as is
the email from a concerned alumnus that prompted the
response:

Dear Mr. [Gretavo]:

Thank you for your email regarding Professor Ernest
May's involvement with The 9/11 Commission Report . I
hope that you will understand that the University
cannot possibly review and comment on all the reports
and documents with which our professors are associated.

I appreciate your taking the time to share your
concerns with me.

Best regards,

Derek Bok

Dear President Bok,

I write to you as both alumnus of Harvard College ('96)
and current member of Harvard's administrative staff
to request a formal statement from you on the subject
of the evidence that the events of September 11 have
been and continue to this day to be misrepresented in a
profoundly malicious and unconscionable manner. As a
senior adviser to the 9/11 Commission Harvard Professor
of History Ernest May has associated my alma mater
with a report that is acknowledged by a growing number
of people around the world to be, without exaggerating,
a criminally deceptive document, as it intentionally
deflects blame from the actual planners and executors
of the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center
complex.

A thorough summary of the relevant issues may be found
in the following documentary:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&sourceid=do...

and further documentation on the subject on this
website: http://www.st911.org

An institution that is as highly regarded as Harvard,
and whose motto is "truth", cannot be allowed to
remain silent on an issue of such import. I attempted
without success to bring these issues to the attention
of Prof. William Kirby while he was Dean of FAS.
Presumably because he knows me personally he did
respond to my inquiry only to express his ignorance of
the subject, but his faith in his colleague Professor
May.

I replied to him that the facts suggest that his
colleague was at the very least negligent in his job of
advising the 9/11 Commission and urged him to become
familiar with the evidence. He did not reply so I
cannot say with certainty if he read my message.

As shown by the recent actions of Brigham Young
University against their professor of physics Steven
Jones, placed on paid leave for his audacity in
publishing and discussing with students his research
proving beyond reasonable doubt that the WTC was
demolished with explosives, the time has come for the
leaders of American and world academia to weigh in on
the subject of academic freedom, and beyond that to
speak truth to power on the subject of the atrocities
committed on September 11, 2001.

I trust that you will acknowledge your receipt of this
inquiry from a concerned alumnus and reflect on its
significance. The time has come to confront an ever
more clearly troubling reality--this institution cannot
remain silent on this issue and retain its credibility
into the future.

Should you wish to discuss the issues involved in more
detail I would be happy to meet with you in person at
your convenience.

Respectfully yours,

[Gretavo]

Harvard College Class of 1996

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
gretavo's picture

still lying...

Freshman Seminar 40g : 9/11--The Event and the 9/11 Commission Report
Harvard College/GSAS: 4343
Spring 2007-2008
Ernest R. May

Location: ***********

Meeting time: **********

Explores attacks on 9/11/2001, through eyes of 10 commissioners, 5 Republicans and 5 Democrats, who accepted late in 2002 the assignment of investigating all "facts and circumstances relating to the terrorist attacks." Reviews evidence and testimony asking how commissioners reached their conclusions. Topics: origin and character of Islamist extremism; character, cultures, and operations of U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies; formulation of national security policy in White House and oversight by Congress and news media.

larry horse's picture

i love this line

"5 Republicans and 5 Democrats" as if that proves there could not have been any tendency among these commissioners. This is probably one of the courses required for Freshman who'd like to write op-eds for The Crimson, and later on The NYT. I wonder what kind of nightmares this douche, Ernest R. May has.

gretavo's picture

a pattern of neglect emerges... whither Veritas?

Saturday, 25 February 2006

Which Political Correctness?

by CKR

A currently politically correct (rightwing) interpretation of Larry Summers's resignation from the presidency of Harvard University is that political correctness (leftwing) brought him down. So say the Economist, the Times of London, and the Los Angeles Times, along with many others.

It is true that Summers did some good things for students and irritated the faculty. It is true that he was brought in to "reform" some of Harvard's practices. But it is necessary to bring the people you want to reform along with you, the faculty in this case, and Summers didn't bother to do that. Sometimes it appeared that he was going out of his way to irritate them.

But is that the main story here? Timing suggests otherwise, and Time and The Nation have picked up that story.

The Institutional Investor published an 18,000-word story about a month ago on the Andrei Schleifer affair. Schleifer went to Russia from Harvard in the 1990s on a grant from US AID to help with the development of free markets. He, his wife and associates wound up pushing their own investment schemes and getting wealthy. The government found this to be a misuse of its funds and sued Harvard for $31 million. Schleifer is still a professor in Harvard's economics department, and the committee that investigates ethics violations has lain dormant. Summers urged the dean of the College of Arts and Sciences to keep Schleifer on.

Summers has been Schleifer's friend for a long time, before Schleifer went to Russia, through those times when Summers was in the Treasury Department and the World Bank and on to today. The Institutional Investor article found no connection between Summers and Schleifer beyond friendship. The Harvard Corporation has said that he had no connection to their part in the Schleifer lawsuit.

The Institutional Investor article may have been the last straw on the camel's back. But it raises questions as to Summers's relationship with Schleifer while Schleifer and friends were partying it up in Moscow.