911BLOGGER.COM, the home base of the Fake 9/11 Truth Movement, is relentless! After reading about Sibel and the evil Poppies of Afghanistan I found this 're-post' of a statement apparently by the 911PressForTruth.com team. It's a re-post from Myspace to 9/11blogger then to here.

--------------------------------------------
(Re-posted from MySpace)

'FOOTNOTE 44' - Seeking Funds For Important New Documentary

Dear Fans:

Rough export of NYC CAN LIHOP questions... I will clean up the text when I have more time. The questions are in their pdf as IMAGES... guess they don't want a lot of copying and pasting...

We are continuing to clean up the formatting here... - c455

FSC (Family Steering Committee)
QUESTIONS TO THE 9/11 COMMISSION WITH RATINGS OF ITS PERFORMANCE IN PROVIDING ANSWERS

COMPILED BY MINDY KLEINBERG AND LORIE VAN AUKEN
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IN RED
MOST BUT NOT ALL OF THE QUESTIONS OF THE FSC ARE RATED HERE
SEE HTTP://911INDEPENDENTCOMMISSION.ORG/QUESTIONS.HTML

http://nyccan.org/

http://www.911blogger.com/node/19796

http://glennbeck.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/04/06/debunking-fema-camp-myths/...

Glenn Beck has Jim "Popular Mechanic" Meigs on to debunk the FEMA camp rumors, and gets his ass handed to him in comments. Unlike with 9/11 hit pieces I can't see a single comment in support of the shills--in fact a few people mention 9/11 truth as well. Is this part of the effort to discredit 9/11 truth by association with right wing nuts? As in, "the people even farther to the fringe than Beck"? Or are we seeing the results of a miscalculation on the part of the cover-uppers?

Below is a snippet from the discussion at Truthaction about the new "Active Thermitic" paper. After pointing out that in comments on a related article somewhere someone posted "THERE. WERE. NO. PLANES.", correctly suggesting that such a post is intended to make the new research look like "kooky konspiracy" stuff, user "Arcterus" proceeds to employ the tried and (un)true tactic of lumping together no-planes at the WTC with no AA77 at the Pentagon.

Moyers: Why is it so hard to prosecute? Why hasn't anyone been brought to justice over this?

Mentions explosions, demolitions, Silverstein, Pentagon. Unfortunately also alludes to "middle easterners" having been involved and someone "letting it happen" but oh well, I'll take it...

http://blogs.tampabay.com/media/2009/04/lemonades-from-lemons-how-rescue...

Excellent analysis!

http://counterpunch.com/hudson04062009.html

Will the Debtors Fight Back?
The IMF Rules the World
By MICHAEL HUDSON

The Center for an Informed America

NEWSLETTER #68D
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr68d.html
February 13, 2005
September 11, 2001 Revisited

ACT II: ADDENDUM 1

The Center for an Informed America

NEWSLETTER #68C
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr68c.html
October 2, 2004
September 11, 2001 Revisited: Act II

ACT II, PART III

The Center for an Informed America

NEWSLETTER #68B
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr68b.html
October 2, 2004
September 11, 2001 Revisited: Act II

ACT II, PART II

The Center for an Informed America

NEWSLETTER #68A
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr68.html
October 2, 2004
September 11, 2001 Revisited: Act II

[Oops: in Act I, I incorrectly identified Ted Olson's wife as Susan Olson, rather than Barbara Olson. I think Susan Olson was actually Cindy Brady, sister of Marcia, Jan, Greg, Peter and Bobby. As far as I know, she was never married to a reactionary member of the Bush team.]

Act II

Given the number of eyewitnesses who saw a plane flying towards the pentagon before the explosion there, combined with the lack of the expected damage and debris that would have resulted from the crash of a jumbo passenger jet, the most likely scenario is that a plane flew *over* the building nearly simultaneously with a bomb or bombs being detonated inside the building.

New Research Contradicts Pentagon 9-11 Story

published in the April, 2009 Rock Creek Free Press

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09095/960750-53.stm

Suspect in officers' shooting was into conspiracy theories
Sunday, April 05, 2009
By Dennis B. Roddy, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Richard Andrew Poplawski was a young man convinced the nation was secretly controlled by a cabal that would eradicate freedom of speech, take away his guns and use the military to enslave the citizenry.