visualizing 9/11

As far as the Zionism-9/11 research group within the Truth Movement goes, Wendy is definitely not our best spokesperson. Some people who make films, or write and research are not necessarily also adept at holding live, debate-like discussions with someone who has a professional, academic background. I did wonder at times if she had brought ANY notes to consult. It seemed like Kevin Barrett, on issues of Zionist history and ideology, key events such as WWI and the Balfour Declaration, had to almost prompt her, or fill in key historic information that she was leaving out, but nonetheless was highly relevant to HER case that she was trying to put forward. If you are presenting a case, but leave out large, crucial chunks of info, or can’t remember crucial historical details to back up controversial points (and have no notes), or if you present these bits of information in a non-connected, incomplete, random fashion, the interviewer, in this case, Kevin Barrett - an experienced academic, who has already undergone the successful defense of his own doctoral dissertation – will have full control of the conversation. Her California Valley Girl linguistic presentation in juxtaposition to a highly sensitive, and fairly complicated subject matter, also did not help our cause too much either. I sure am glad that Sophie came on in the second hour. She sounded more like how I wished Wendy had sounded in the first hour. Now, I am sure that Wendy is a fine person, she does care about the Palestinians and their plight, which no one is allowed to talk about within the media paradigm now embraced by the United States of AIPAC, and I would like to see her Neturei Karta film, but perhaps she is not the best person for us to put forward as the one who will debate on our behalf.

Kevin Barrett asked her WHY (i.e. the motive) she thought that Israel did 9/11? Her simply mentioning the now-famous Zionist Agenda document “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” without at least a brief summary of what it says, or how what it says relates to the element of “Motive” in the 9/11 case against Israel, doesn’t help the listener put things together. Information without context is useless. She mentioned the document, and then Kevin Barrett incorrectly explained to her what it was, but also conveniently left out what it said or who put it together. It is a report prepared by The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies’ "Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000." It was prepared as a series of policy points to be discussed, in summary-form, during campaign speeches to be given by Benjamin Netanyahu as he was running for Prime Minister of Israel in 1996 (just after the Rabin assassination). This rather aggressive policy document was prepared for Netanyahu’s campaign by well-known Neo-cons such as Richard Perle, James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and his wife Meyrav Wurmser. Others participated as contributors as well.

I am trying to put together an outline type checklist of points and people of interest in the case we are trying to make or suggest.

The other day, someone said that there wasn’t much of a case in tying Israel to 9/11, to which I replied, do you have a spare hour or two that I could present my case to you in?

One thing that Wendy did not mention and it is a biggie:

(ICTS) Integrated Consultants on Targeted Security Intl (owned by Menachem Atzmon and Mossad’s own, Ezra Harel). They provided London’s bus and tube security on 7/7, and also provided security on 9/11 to Boston’s Logan Airport and Newark International (three of four 9/11 flights came out of these two airports). ICTS (through its U.S. subsidiary Huntleigh USA) also provided security for both American and United Airlines. As Wendy would say, HELLO! If you were to wire up the planes for installation of Dov Zakheim’s Flight Termination System (FTS) remote access module, the ICTS guys at Logan and Newark would be the way to go. Many of their employees are ex-Shin Bet operatives.

As far as the WTC demolitions go, the New York triad of Port Authority head Lewis Eisenberg and his fellow Zionist buddies Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy has also got to be looked at and discussed. Why was the Port Authority authorizing all those elevator core shaft projects during the summer of 2001, and why did the Port Authority shut down parts of the towers on the weekend before 9/11? And why did the Port Authority have all those pre-9/11 evacuation drills? The demolition crews all seem to be connected to Urban Moving Systems, a Mossad front, some of whose employees on 9/11 were caught trying to blow up the George Washington Bridge to New Jersey. Again, as Wendy would say, HELLO!

There are also the other important “coincidental” events around the time of 9/11 such as the attempted wave of terror across America that other caught-and-deported Israeli bomb squads seemed to be trying at the time, including the Israeli attempt to blow up the Mexican parliament building in October of 2001.

And then there are the Neo-cons who had a special operations (OSP) clubhouse right in the middle of the Pentagon, but that is for another day. Guess who has back-door access into U.S. military computers? That’s right, the boys at the OSP.