New 2008 German Thought Control Dictionary

I wonder how Prof. Tony Martin would feel about it, given the origin of anti-hamitism...

Big Lies - Harold D. Brackman, the Babylonian Talmud and the Invention of the Hamitic Myth

Dr. Harold D. Brackman of the Simon Wiesenthal (Nazi-hunting) Center has taken to denying the Jewish invention of the Hamitic Myth of late. The Hamitic Myth alleges that God, through the biblical Noah, cursed African people for all eternity, made them black and ugly, endowed them with thick lips, big red eyes, kinky hair and (for the men), elongated penises - all of this as a mark of his dislike for the race. To add insult to injury, God allegedly said that Africans would forever be slaves, "hewers of wood and drawers of water," for the other races of humankind.

Yet, believe it or not, here is what Brackman himself wrote in his 1977 UCLA Ph.D. dissertation ("The Ebb and Flow of Conflict: A History of Black Jewish Relations Through 1900," p.80) - "[T]here is no denying that the Babylonian Talmud was the first source to read a Negrophobic content into the episode" [that is, Noah's supposed curse of perpetual slave status for Africans].

A letter from the same Brackman appearing in the New York Times (Jewish owned) and the Buffalo Challenger (African American) mendaciously asserted that "A new charge...is that my dissertation proves that the rabbis who compiled the Talmud 'invented' racism by concocting the so called 'Ham myth'....The fateful linkage between slave status and black skin as part of a divine curse was first made centuries later by Islamic writers," (New York Times, Feb. 14, 1994, p. A16).

Lenni Brenner knows a big lie when he sees one. He is author of Jews in America Today (Secaucus, NJ: Lyle Stuart, 1986) and Zionism in the Age of the Dictators (Westport, CT: Lawrence Hill, 1983). Here is his comment on Brackman's reluctance to tell the truth - "It is amazing that anyone could lie about what he wrote in a book that sits in the libraries for all to check!" (N. Y. Amsterdam News, Feb. 19, 1994).

More Lies

The onslaughtniks seem to have perfected the art of telling lies as can be easily demonstrated in their stages of denial of Jewish involvement in the slave trade.

First they denied Jewish involvement altogether, as witnessed in letters to the Wellesley News and elsewhere. Next, they pulled a 2% figure out of Skip Gates' hat - "Jews only brought to the Americas 2% of the slaves." Then they said that pro-slavery Jews (like Judah Benjamin, secretary of state of the Confederacy), were not practicing Jews.

When none of the above seemed to work they moved to distort the record in a fundamental and unprincipled way. Brer Cudjoe, former Africana Studies chair, alleged that The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews imputed to Jews a racial predisposition to slave trading - a most amazing statement. President Walsh took all this to new heights of mendacity when, according to the Vineyard Gazette (Martha's Vineyard), she told an audience that "Mr. Martin has been criticized for writing and teaching that Jews created the slave trade and are conspiring to rule the world." This, she said, "has all the hallmarks of classic anti-Semitic hate literature." How approximately one day's readings on Jewish involvement in slavery came to be transmuted by the learned lady into Jewish "creation" of the slave trade, etc., will forever remain one of life's great mysteries. The only "classic" feature of this big lie is the regularity with which this tactic recurs in the Jewish onslaught's arsenal of dirty tricks. Instead of debating real issues, these tricksters are more comfortable inflaming public opinion with lies and then attacking the lies of their own creation. Incidentally, Skip Gates was a fellow presenter with Mrs. Walsh at the forum in question.

Cudjoe appears not to have been invited.

[Sorry D, but the page you "iframed" in the comment was making a print dialog come up every time the front page loads, so I removed it. -Gret]

Dang! I didn't have a print dialog come up when I was testing it so, I thought it would be OK. I could have put the main page that carried the article but, there was too much other crap.

I do like iframes sometimes. Less to copy/paste and not having to search and extract code, it preserves the original formatting. Initially, I did have a problem with it because I stupidly kept failing to close the damn thing and the whole right-hand column of the page disappeared. I was freakin'. I thought I'd kilt it.