Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction

Jpass's picture

A new paper from Stephen Jones and company at www.JournalOf911Studies.com...


Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction

I don't understand much of the scientififc stuff but the ending paragraphs give a good idea of their findings:

The temperatures required for the observed spherule-formation and evaporation of materials observed in the WTC dust (table 1) are significantly higher than temperatures reachable by the burning of jet fuel and office materials in the WTC buildings (table 2). The temperatures required to melt iron (1,538 °C) and molybdenum (2,623 °C), and to vaporize lead (1,740 °C) and aluminosilicates (~2,760°C), are completely out of reach of the fires in the WTC buildings (maximum 1,100 °C). We wish to call attention to this discrepancy: the official view implicating fires as the main cause for the ultimate collapses of the WTC Towers and WTC 7 (FEMA [13], NIST [15] ) is inadequate to explain this temperature gap and is therefore incomplete at best. The formation of numerous metal-rich spherules is also remarkable, for it implies formation of high-temperature droplets of the molten metals, dispersed in the air where they cool to form spherules. As displayed in figures 3 and 4, we observe spherules with high iron and aluminum contents, a chemical signature which is not consistent with formation from melted steel.

The data provide strong evidence that chemical reactions which were both violent and highly-exothermic contributed to the destruction of the WTC buildings. NIST neglected the high-temperature and fragmentation evidence presented here: it appears nowhere in their final report [15]. Proposed new building codes based on the WTC disaster must address all available evidence for what caused the complete and rapid destruction of these skyscrapers. Understanding the mechanisms that led to the destruction of the World Trade Center will enable scientists and engineers to provide a safer environment for people using similar buildings and benefit firefighters who risk their lives trying to save others. Thus, a thorough investigation which considers these data, showing extremely high temperatures and severe fragmentation in the formation of small metal-rich spheres
during the WTC Towers destruction, is highly motivated. In particular, the repeatedly-delayed report on the destruction of WTC 7 on 9/11/2001 [21] should address these striking facts.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Jpass's picture

at this point...

The available information and examples of the cover-up point to one conclusion....planned demolition of the entire wtc complex.

1. The visual evidence suggest controlled demolition

2. The collapses themselves suggest controlled demolition

3. WTC 7 has, after 6 years, not been explained but controlled demolition has been somehow ruled out(?)

4. There is no evidence backing the official claims that WTC 7 fell do to fire. Of course all this WTC 7 business leads us to the ultimate conclusions that the other wtc I and II were also pulverized in a planned demolition.

A statism can't wire a building for with explosives. Human Hands physically wired a building for demolition and these hands can be handcuffed.