Two-hour demolition debate on CFRB Toronto 1010 tonight

Richard Gage vs. Ron Craig from Monday night 11 p.m., 11/12/2007.
Thanks 911blogger Mekt_Ranzz
http://www.911blogger.com/node/12516

It’s good to be back here with my friends at WTCD. For four days I was banned by accident – an innocent victim of Gretavo’s gratuitous IP purges :). Although certain IP addresses may have been attacking this site’s server, mine was not one of them. I freaked, and immediately thought WTCD had been banned in Canada (we have “hate thought/speech” laws here) and then I found out that my IP was individually blocked from any access here, but my neighbors could access the site. Then total Hunter Thompsonesque paranoia set in, and I thought the Canadian cable company had perhaps been ordered (by somebody) to block my IP from accessing this site, knowing that Gretavo would never have blocked it. Was it something I wrote? I was thrilled to hear that it was the G man (not the other G-man) who had banned my 2 IP addresses by mistake. I am sleeping better now, thanks.

Next Story:
Last night my bedtime radio hour (actually two hours) was the Richard Syrett Show on 1010 FM out of Toronto. The match-up was our own Richard Gage, an absolute primo asset to 9/11 Truth, vs. a total shill for the NWO cover–up job, Ron Craig, a Canadian demolition special effects guy, expert in the blowing up of automobiles, not buildings. Needless to say Richard Gage smoked this guy, no pun intended. Craig’s arsenal consisted of red herrings, straw men, obfuscations, dissimilar similes, let’s not talk too much about WTC 7, and a host of other tired tactics. Save your laughter until the end. For Richard Gage, arguing with this tool was like shootin’ fish in a barrel.

Jim Hoffman even called in and whacked Mr. Craig around a bit. Two people who believe in Gravity against one paid liar – no fair. I really hope that someone recorded this show for internet consumption. It was a classic. Actually, I think I do know someone who did. I’ll check. I see the link now thanks.

Craig’s main points – Firemen and policemen are not properly trained to recognize the sounds of actual demolition type explosions. He brings in the example of how local firefighters thought that a bomb went off inside a burning house, but Craig, as a trained demolitions expert on the scene, knew that the sound was caused by the tires on a car exploding inside the burning garage. He was also passionate about his idea that thermite is too low-tech, so why would a hi-tech op like 9/11 use thermite. He didn’t seem to understand the idea of using the silent cutting power of thermite and keeping any AUDIBLE sounds of explosions down to a minimum -- an excellent point made by Richard G. a couple of times. Gage solved the problem of accurate and reliable firing of charges in a wireless demolitions system being used deep inside a building, say at its core – multiple redundancy. Craig also didn’t want to linger too long on any of Professor Jones’ empirical, forensic findings and their implications. He compared the 8 weeks of flowing molten iron beneath three WTC buildings to molten solder drippings from a car’s electrical system coming from the chassis of a car after you blow it up. The idea is that all the electric soldering in the WTCs melted from the fires and the collapse energy to create the rivers of molten hell beneath the buildings -- those hotspots seen from space. He, of course, didn’t want to touch on things like the Galilean free-fall equation or the symmetry of complete collapse displayed in the falls of all three buildings. He was big with the unsafe nature of the truss floor structure system in the WTC buildings. Gage reminded him that this truss structure has been standard now for decades and no moves globally are being made to rethink its wide employment as a structural system. The truss system does seem to be susceptible to explosives however.

They also had a discussion about the NY-NJ PORT AUTHORITY (see the Lewis Eisenberg Story) and its elevator shaft “upgrade” projects going on in the six-month period preceding 9/11. The info on these Port Authority directed WTC elevator shaft and wiring, cabling projects is starting to be discussed again. Oh oh. Craig couldn’t understand how a bunch of demo experts could wire up the buildings (Gage estimated a crew of 24) without anyone who worked in the WTC noticing the work. Obviously he is unaware of the dual phenomenon of night falling and people leaving their offices to journey home, leaving security all to their lonesomes into the night. Richard Gage pointed out that office workers would not have access to the elevator shafts and thus the buildings’ structural cores, so the WTC workers would not even be in a position to notice any new work being done in the publicly unseen core of the building’s structure. Craig also seemed to be unaware of the fact that Marvin Bush and Wirt Walker III’s Securacom/Stratasec security company was minding the store. I guess because he can’t figure out how Muslims could wire the buildings with nobody catching them, an impossible scenario, and thus the controlled demolition theory doesn’t make any sense. Of course, he knows what is going on here and has studied his Poplar Mechanics game plan manual fairly well. He had the same sing-songy voice that Condi uses when she’s lying her ass off.

I went to bed at 1 am, content and happy, unbanned from WTCD, and also knowing that the perps and the fifth columnists got nothing, and Richard Gage had just verbally punched the lights out of Mr. Craig’s 9/11 demolition cover-up arguments, a set of arguments which are quickly becoming a very tired collection of obfuscations, red herrings, straw men, circular logic, complete lies, and utter nonsense. It’s time for 9/11 Truth to begin discussing the role of the Port Authority and its Chairman in the wiring of the WTC. Most of the people who should be persons of interest to this movement are barely discussed at all. Who did the security at Logan and Newark Int’l? Who is Menachem Atzmon?

that's about all I have to say...