Home » WTCD Compendium » The Truth Movement - A Critical Analysis » The Many Methods of Mass Deception » Managing the Discourse » Controlled Opposition and the Fake Liberal/Left

Confusion on Alternet - Shill Confused Over Which WTC7 Cover Story to Use!

gretavo's picture
Submitted by gretavo on Wed, 2007-10-10 15:27.

Join the fun here

Laughably antiquated propaganda! Posted by: gretavo on Oct 9, 2007 11:07 AM

 they hate our freedoms! and our support of Israel! and WTC building 7 destroyed itself the way buildings often do, in the exact manner of a professional controleld demolition with explosives!

» RE: Laughably antiquated propaganda! Posted by: andy_f_90

» Andy_f_90, what an excellent summary of the issue. Posted by: Prophit

You seem to enjoy putting words in my mouth, gretavo. All I said was Osama did 9/11 and no one else. Posted by: yellow on Oct 9, 2007 10:52 PM

It was officially acknowleged that building 7 was "pulled down" on orders from those who owned it. This was on advice from the NYFD because of the damage and because it was necessary to avoid the spread of further damage. Most people believe Al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11. I'm sorry if that is difficult for you to cope with and acknowlege. Denial is very unhealthy. Maybe you need to talk to someone.

» I have to comment.... spontaneous decision by the FD to pull building 7? Doesn't it take days to do Posted by: Prophit

» ummm... yellow, you're confusing your cover stories... Posted by: gretavo

» if WTC7 was intentionally demolished then why have these contracts been awarded? Posted by: gretavo

‹ Carnegie Foundation Seeks to Increase "Islam Experts" Reach in the Public Media -upGo NOW to this Alternet piece and comment on Chomsky's 9/11 Denial problems! ›
»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Annoymouse's picture

comments closed?

Submitted by Annoymouse on Wed, 2007-10-10 19:30.

"The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated."

tsssss.
m7

»
gretavo's picture

yeah go figure!

Submitted by gretavo on Wed, 2007-10-10 20:37.

But Yellow managed to get in this gem:

I thought that it was widely acknowledged that WTC 7 was Pulled Down to avoid further damage.
Posted by: yellow on Oct 10, 2007 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THe controlled demolition was to pull the building down to limit damage to the area surrounding the building. Another good source is the popular mechanics book which give logistical and scientific refutation of wingnut conspiricy theories.

Not only does he fall back to "pull it means demolish on purpose", but he recommends the Popular Mechanics book which contradicts that interpretation.  With shills like these, who needs truthers!  As was predicted, the smarter rats left the ship early without telling the simpler ones who have been left to hold down the fort of the 9/11 Lie in advance of its controlled demolition!

Friends, our work only gets easier from here on out! Laughing
»
Annoymouse's picture

...

Submitted by Annoymouse on Wed, 2007-10-10 21:20.

[quote=gretavo] Not only does he fall back to "pull it means demolish on purpose", but he recommends the Popular Mechanics book which contradicts that interpretation. With shills like these, who needs truthers! [/quote] He, i was thinking that too.. incredible , how much stupidity that yellow guy packed into one short post ... maybe hes a false flag poster ? :) em7

»
gretavo's picture

false flag truthing

Submitted by gretavo on Thu, 2007-10-11 08:37.

might or might not be a bad idea... Cool

»