Comment Voting Compromised Chez Blogger? And What's Up with Selective Comment Moderation?

I've noticed over there when a certain person is on a thread the swing in voting increases. A normal thread over there may have some disagreement and small swings in votes, but when this person is in the thread the numbers increase dramtically, in both directions. With her posts showing very high positive votes ALWAYS, and anyone willing to speak objectively getting strong negative votes. I mean it seems pretty obvious somethings going on with that.

The whole Kennepunkport crap that was going on over there was disgusting in the way it was handled. What was the point of all that? It seemed like when anyone tried to bring in some reason into that mess the comments would get voted down so low they'd be hidden. And the people running the campaign at a point seemed to have people afraid to say anything objective out of fear of being slandered by them.

I have an inkling that both Gold & Arabesque are about trying to stay influential in the 9/11 movement but at the same time trying to steer things into more of a LIHOP direction, they almost seem like planted damage control agents. I think that whoever is behind 9/11 would definitely prefer dealing with some of the LIHOP options versus the MIHOP options. Circumstantial evidence would be much easier for them to discredit than direct physical evidence. Both Gold & Arabesque push the circumstantial over the physical, which makes me question their motives. They also seem to try to walk the tightrope of staying in the game of influence and creating misdirection.

They both regurgitate out the same LIHOP stuff every month or so. For Gold its Pakistan, Sibel Edmonds, victims families, etc. For Arabesque its pushing out his library of Pentagon witness statements to back up the "Official" story. With all of the different types of circumstantial evidence there is, why do they limit themselves to things that seem to help the "Official" story. This is the kind of stuff the perps want us to look at. They know they can deal with circumstantial if they have to. All they have to do is manufacture more "circumstantial" evidence that lessens their accountability.

The perps are having a harder time trying to massage the physical evidence, which makes me wonder about "truthers" who don't see value in physical evidence.

You asked me if I was given a reason for being selectivly moderated...and no I wasn't. Just one day added a few comments and they didn't pop up so I e-mailed the team members.

I just got a long e-mail response from SBG saying how hard him and the other team members have worked really hard for years  without selling books and trying to be big personalities in the 9/11 truth movement and that my mis-trust would be better spent on people like that who are trying to be personalities in the movement like Alex Jones.

THe blog moderation is all about Nico and no planers. They are co-intelpro and they had to be stopped from associating 911blogger.com with the no planers.

And ultimately it's up to me to decide who to trust and if I think he is sitting at CIA headquarters moderating my comments then so be it.

I think the selective moderation has been lifted from my account though. He said all I had to do was ask.