How to Responsibly and Effectively Re-Open the Pentagon Debate?

I think it's unfortunate that in the aftermath of Operation CIT people seem less inclined to talk about the Pentagon for fear of disturbing an imagined truce in the interest of the "greater movement". "Problem-Reaction-Solution" seems to have been used to achieve this self-censorship with the "CIT Flyover" drama. The scenario, which I'm not claiming to know to have happened, is as follows: Aldo and Craig (the Citizen Investigation Team) produce a hot new video featuring original research in the form of interviews of eyewitnesses talking about where they were when AA77 flew over them. These accounts lead to the logical conclusion that the plane seen by various people in various ways (including radar, for example) approaching the Pentagon in fact flew over the Pentagon at roughly the same time as explosives were detonated inside the building, leading many to believe they saw the plane impact the Pentagon. The key is to present this idea in the most obnoxious way imaginable, so Aldo and Craig become the Penn and Teller of the truth movement, as obnoxious as the real P&T are in their *anti* truth work. Hence the problem is framed. Following the creation of the problem the desired reaction is advanced--the truth movement is being taken over by loony theories being pushed as fact by obnoxious blowhards. That's why we're getting nowhere as a movement. SOMETHING MUST BE DONE! Once enough people are on board with that reaction they can be enlisted in the crafting of a solution, in this case statements by as many (and as credible) researchers as possible against CIT but also stressing the need to avoid "discredited theories". Thereafter anyone who does not treat the official story with regard to the Pentagon as established fact is accused of sabotaging the movement and marginalized as a troublemaker outside the mainstream. It should go without saying that essentially the same tactics are used in convincing the general public that *any* questioning of 9/11 whatsoever is unpatriotic--indeed a sign of mental illness.

Since a great effort has apparently been made to dampen interest in examining the case of the Pentagon on 9/11 the inquiring soul will naturally be inclined to ask why. The easy answer is because they have something to hide. So what is it? There are numerous questions that still need to be addressed with regard to the facts--including some number of questions that haven't been thought of yet. Only one of those questions is "Was AA77 the sole cause of the damage to the Pentagon?" What are the rest?