Truthaggedon - Coming soon?
With the caveat that this may sound like doomshillery (because in a way it is,) I wonder if people had any thoughts on the idea that someone may be determined to effect major losses to the credibility of thw "9/11 Truth Movement". Here's a comment I left recently at Willyloman's blog:
I don’t think I can take credit for coining “Truthaggedon” (or however it’s spelled) but whether or not it’s realistic to think that the fake truthers could suicide their credibility and take all the real truthers with them on the occasion of the tenth anniversary I think we should never miss an opportunity to make predictions based on what we expect the fakers to do so as to deepen our understerdanding of their agenda. In this case I think it’s pretty clear that the psychological weight given to a tenth anniversary (of anything) isn’t something that the fakers can allow to pass without some kind of push. Those of us who agree that there is a huge problem of fakers involved in infiltration and sabotage of the truth movement need not agree on anything else to work towards the goal of clarifying as much as possible for the interested lay person, and we need not stop doing that regardless of what the perps and their apologists have in store.
Alex and Steven Jones, Charlie Sheen, Mark Dice, Michael Ruppert, et al... many figures I consider clearly ill-intentioned have been needling their way back into the spotlight in the run up to the 10th.
Thoughts?
- Real Truther's blog
- Login to post comments
Thoughts on "The Toronto Hearings"?
from blogger
On the 10th anniversary of 9/11, the International Center for 9/11 Studies will sponsor four days of citizen hearings at Ryerson University in the city of Toronto, Canada. These international hearings will be commonly referred to as the Toronto Hearings and more information can be found at http://torontohearings.org/ .
The objectives of the hearings are as follows:
1. To present evidence that the U.S. government’s official investigation into the events of September 11, 2001, as pursued by various government and government-appointed agencies, is seriously flawed and has failed to describe and account for the 9/11 events.
2. To single out the most weighty evidence of the inadequacy of the U.S. government’s investigation; to organize and classify that evidence; to preserve that evidence; to make that evidence widely known to the public and to governmental, non-governmental and inter-governmental organizations.
3. To submit a record and a summary of the Hearings, together with signed Statutory Declarations by witnesses, to relevant governments, groups and international agencies with the request that a full and impartial investigation be launched into the events of September 11, 2001, which have been used to initiate military invasions and to restrict the rights of citizens.
4. To engage the attention of the public and media through witness testimony as well as through public talks and media events during the four day event.
For more information, contact the steering committee at http://torontohearings.org/about/ .
Please support a participant in the Toronto Hearings by making a donation to pay for their travel and accommodations.
problematic participants
Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan are not in my view trustworthy or sincere. Niels Harrit seems to be a nanothermite red/gray chip one trick pony, so his contribution is likely to be problematic. Otherwise it looks like a decent lineup, though many of the individuals involved are unknown quantities to me. I can only hope that if this is being seen by anyone as an opportunity to sabotage the movement then I hope that becomes clear to the honest folks involved and they finally wise up to who the real infiltrators are...
Jesse Ventura: Space Beams at the WTC
Over at 911blogger -- I'm not going to link to the AJ show on which he supposedly argues for space beamery. Judy Wood's supporters are really trying to raise her profile recently. I predict that this is all part of the build up to the tenth anniversary -- massively cognitive-dissonance-inducing eruptions of the whole spectrum of nuttery: from DEW at one end to "You're crazy and discrediting the movement if you don't accept that bin Laden was just assassinated" at the other.
Yeah, the folks at Blogger are a year and a half late afaic...
Jesse Ventura's 9/11 Show a Nietzschean Farce
December 2009, WTCD
Right now, another likely fake we've called out, Steven Jones, is using Jesse's latest shark-jump to boost his own credibility (on that Blogger thread about Jesse's alleged support for space beams expressed on Alex Jones' show) by providing an FAQ about nanothermite. Of course what doesn't seem to be an issue for anyone is Jones' own credibility with regard to the provenance and integrity of the dust samples he claims to have analyzed....
Of course the truthaction clique that pretends to be the "responsible wing" of the truth movement is crowing about how "they told you so", as if they were the only ones who could tell Jesse is a charlatan. Of course they will never ban Jesse or Alex Jones supporters at 911blogger because then who would the "responsible" fakes have to make them look good?
more WTCD on Fake Jesse Ventura
LIHOP Shills: Jesse Ventura's Fake Truth Kool Aid is Deeee-LI ...
Is the Entire Fake Truth Movement Preparing to "Jump the Big Shark ...
RFK, Sirhan Sirhan, Alan Dershowitz, and Jesse Ventura... What's ...
here's the link
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-05-10/jesse-goes-space-beams
Note that Prof Jones is being uncharacteristically chatty as if the whole point is to use Jesse's shark-jump to come off as trustworthy himself.