Why doesn't David Chandler publicly disavow Jeffrey "Shure" Hill?

Just my conjecture.

Hill and other fake truthers created a clique which on the surface promoted 9-11 truth. While feigning a shared objective, they probably approached and even promoted the work of David Chandler. Now that Chandler is ensnared, the clique goes about it's real objective which is to undermine the truth movement from the inside. Among their activities are to discredit David Griffin.

Different fake truther cliques operate. Jon Gold has his meme where he is openly against controlled demolition and promotes the Pakistani ISI angle et al. He is not of course the operator who would befriend and promote David Chandler.

But other fake truther cliques are pro Controlled Demolition such as Jim Hoffman. Perhaps Hill belongs to one of these. They may be pro CD, but are still undermining 9-11 truth. The Pentagon/CID story is less a litmus test for me, but Hill undermining David Griffin based on wholesale capitulation to the OCT is a dead giveaway that he is a fake truther.

Going back to David Chandler, I think he is a good and honest truther but is unaware that his associates have a hidden agenda to undermine 9-11 truth. Being a part of a clique, he is lead to wrong rabbit holes such as vehemently opposing CIT which I think is unproductive or in this case being associated with a critique of DRG.

OBL, whether he died 8 years ago, or 2 days ago does not matter, he did not get AlQuaeda to plant demo charges in Bldg 7.

How would Hill know OBL was alive all these years? He is taking the word of the same machinery (US Gov't and it's spooks) who are hiding how WTC 7 came down.