New Book: Shocked and Awed a Dictionary of the War on Terror

Brand new (March 2011) just got it as a handy reference guide... not particularly truth friendly (or particularly unfriendly...)


- gretavo's blog
- Login to post comments
|
|
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 45 guests online.
User loginNavigationFeatured Content WTCD Wiki WTCD Compendium WTCD Podcasts Glossary 9/11 TV News Archive 9/11 Unveiled by Enver Masud David Chandler's YouTube Channel Council for the National Interest Popular Mechanics: Money Masters Orwell Rolls in His Grave Reel Bad Arabs Recent blog posts
WTCD User Comments
|
New Book: Shocked and Awed a Dictionary of the War on Terror![]() Brand new (March 2011) just got it as a handy reference guide... not particularly truth friendly (or particularly unfriendly...)
»
|
PollCan Maduro get a fair trial from Alvin Hellerstein? Of course, Judge Hellerstein is a jurist with integrity. 0% No, Judge Hellerstein works on behalf of the Zionist deep state. 0% Whether he does or not is irrelevant, Maduro is part of the op. 0% He will be bribed into pleading guilty to something minor. 100% Other (specify in comments.) 0% Total votes: 1
Disqus Comments |
Amigo the Movie
Nice that book is available here. I just saw an article on a movie that looks worth watching which I have not seen myself but look forward to. It is about the US invasion of the Philippines. This was done by a US indy film maker.
http://www.onlinemovieshut.com/online-movies/amigo-movie-2010
I think you can watch it on the link above.
"Truthers" and "Bush" and
"Truthers" and "Bush" and "the government" oh my! This is why I always say Americans and Israelis did 9/11. Not only is it closer to the truth than saying "the government" or Bush did it but its an easier "sell" so to speak. The media loves to frame it as either "Al Qaeda" or "the government". Makes it so much easier to push the notion that it was "Al Qaeda" when you make people think the alternative theory was some kind of government wide plot including Congress and the postal service. And of course Bush with a TNT plunger.
exactly right
I should make clear that I don't endorse this book in any way except as a good snapshot of standard leftish mainstream views on the subject. just knowing, as you point out, that one conventional understanding of truthers is that they think "Bush blew up the towers" can help us become better at presenting our case. now I wonder why Jon Gold doesn't say something like "If you look at hit pieces they always say we accuse Bush of being behind 9/11, so we should in fact avoid making this claim" like he does about controlled demolition?