qualifications
No reply from Mr Gold yet..
http://911blogger.com/news/2010-12-02/peer-reviewer-active-thermitic-mat...
LeftWright:
...
Tell me, does one have to be an air defense expert in order to be qualified to have an opinion on NORAD's non-response?
Does someone have to have an advanced degree in financial analysis in order to know that some of the pre-9/11 financial transactions (e.g. "put options") clearly indicate foreknowledge of the event(s)?
Just out of curiosity, exactly what do you consider yourself qualified to have an opinion on?
What are your qualifications in political science, sociology and social psychology? You seem to have no problem expressing opinions on what a sociopolitical movement should and should not do.
...
»
- jameson's blog
- Login to post comments
Love this little exchange...
This Is Not The Jon Gold Movement
Mr. Gold rudely criticizes people for openly speculating about 9/11 events, then he writes articles about certain information that may or may not suggest wider 9/11 foul play.
Submitted by Aidan Monaghan on Fri, 12/10/2010 - 4:58am.
»
Speaking of rude...
From Aidan Monaghan on youtube messaging:
"You're that guy who swears 9/11 was an Inside Job and then attacks evidence supporting that view.
It would be closer to the truth to say that you are most concerned with promoting yourself as some great leader of the Truth cause and resent others who don't accept you as their leader. You are not taken seriously by most.
You also seem like an attention seeking 9/11 "groupie" for lack of a better term, who tries to befriend prominent members of the cause and then later boast of your very loose connections to these people.
Do the cause a favor and find another hobby please."
This will go down with Kevin Barrett's excellent depiction of Jon Gold as a "pugnacious Zionist LIHOPper"... :)
Well, I SUGGEST that if you
Well, I SUGGEST that if you are serious about this movement, and REALLY want to find out about it ,you READ War and Peace from cover to cover, then when you have finished you go back to the front page and read it ALL AGAIN. Then you should watch EVERY episode of EVERY series of Dallas, and then trawl through EVERY SINGLE piece of information that supports the OT on 911. That is the ONLY information that you need, to KNOW that I am a fake truther.
Aidan Monaghan to be banned in 3...
Aidan Monaghan to be banned in 3...2...1
If he survives on Blogger calling out the fake LIHOP gatekeepers, with Jon Gold the king gatekeeper of them all, it will be a first. The emperors very well know they aren't wearing any clothes. They just don't like anyone saying anything about it...
Jon Gold to quit 911Blogger again in
Jon Gold to quit 911Blogger again in 3...2...
Now that LeftWright has joined in speaking out about Jon Gold's nakedness.
______________________
(bold emphasis mine)
I'm not singling you out as "the bad guy"
and statements like this only reinforce the impression that you think that you and ONLY YOU know what is best for the 9/11 truth movement, which further underscores the arrogance you bring to your approach to activism.
Once again, your choice.
I don't consider you a "bad guy" at all, so you have me chuckling as I write this (it's not all about you, bro).
Now, as far as getting the "science verified", which science are you talking about? Basic Newtonian physics (which Mrs. Harnsberger taught us in the 8th grade!) or nanoscale chemical physics, which is way beyond 99.9% of school teachers? After the new year I'm going to talk to the local high school science teachers in my area and hopefully convince our group to do the same throughout the SF bay area. We shall see what comes of that.
Will you be satisfied that the science has been "verified" ( a somewhat comical concept for those that understand that science is a process and not an end product, but I digress) when one, two or more peer reviewed and published papers come out supporting the same findings?
Let me add here that one does not need to verify exactly how the controlled demolition was accomplished in order to understand that a controlled demolition was used. This also applies to the explosive demolitions that brought down the Twin Towers, btw.
The cops say the man jumped off the roof, but video evidence shows he was pushed off the roof by someone who remains unidentified. Are you going to believe the cops or your eyes? Are you going to wait until the perpetrator has been caught and confessed before you are willing to concede that the man was pushed and did not jump? Will you then wait until you know what the perpetrator had for breakfast the day of the murder and what the motive was before you will concede that a murder was committed and not a suicide, as the entire police force still contends?
Shall we add "pedantic" to our growing vocabulary list?
Let's take this off the blog and continue it via email, if you want. I actually have some other things I want to talk to you about, as I do value your opinion on many things and have great respect for your body of work.
Cheers!
The truth shall set us free (and then I can spend more time dancing!).
Love is the only way forward (love means setting aside minor differences with people and working for the greater good, at least to me it does).
Submitted by LeftWright on Thu, 12/09/2010 - 7:02pm.