PNAC Signatory Gets Eyeful of AE911Truth Banner

Lunchtime truthing with huge AE banner and who should walk by and look over? None other than government professor and PNAC signatory Stephen Rosen. Now I don't believe for a second that everyone who signed the PNAC document knew that a "catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor" was just a year away, but I also haven't heard any PNAC signatories including Prof. Rosen tell the truth about 9/11. Or any Harvard professor for that matter, certainly not the other fellow tagged below, Prof. (for now) Marc Hauser, who was found guilty not long ago of 8 instances of scientific misconduct (he cooked data to make it appear that his experiment succeded in supporting his hypothesis).
HARVARD GAZETTE ARCHIVES
http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2002/05.09/08-teachers.html
| This year's Harvard College Professors are (from left) Stephen Rosen, William Mills Todd III, Jeremy Bloxham, and Marc David Hauser. (Staff photo by Kris Snibbe) |
Four honored as College Professors:
Recognized for both teaching and research
Gazette Staff
Four faculty members have been named this year's Harvard College Professors in recognition of their outstanding work as undergraduate teachers as well as for their exceptional achievements in graduate education and research.
This year's honorees are Jeremy Bloxham, professor of geophysics; Marc David Hauser, professor of psychology; Stephen Rosen, the Beton Michael Kaneb Professor of National Security and Military Affairs; and William Mills Todd III, the Curt Hugo Reisinger Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures and professor of comparative literature.
"I'm so pleased to be able to honor and reward four colleagues who contribute with such distinction to the education of our undergraduates," said Jeremy R. Knowles, dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
The five-year chairs are endowed by a gift from John and Frances Loeb. Harvard College Professors also receive a semester of paid leave, commensurate summer salary, or funds to support scholarly work.
>SNIP<
Hauser said that his teaching method varies according to whether he is working with students in a lab course, conducting an undergraduate seminar, or lecturing in his popular Core course, "Science B-29, Evolution of Human Nature." But there is a common thread that runs through his teaching, he said.
"It's about getting people to question things, not just about giving them information."
Hauser said that his Core course is probably his most challenging teaching assignment because the students are from such varied backgrounds, representing all concentrations - from the humanities to the natural sciences - and ranging from freshmen to seniors. But the great advantage of the course is that the material is so stimulating that he does not have to work hard to engage the students' interest, he said.
In his lab courses, which focus on learning in animals, Hauser believes in giving undergraduates leeway to design their own experiments and undertake original work. It is an approach that has paid off.
"In the lab, everybody has a voice, everybody thinks about the design of experiments. Undergraduates are significant contributors along with post-docs. Eighty to 90 percent of undergraduates leave the lab with a publishable paper," Hauser said.
Rosen, who directs the John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies, said that for him teaching is not really about transmitting data. If that were the case, giving a student a paper to read would be just as effective as lecturing for an hour in class.
"Teaching is about changing the student's emotional state, making the timid students more intellectually adventurous, making the cocky less sure that they know all the answers," he said.
Since Rosen teaches a subject that is a hot-button issue for most people, his task in the classroom is to get students to regard the material from a more detached, intellectual perspective and avoid bringing their feelings into play.
"Sometimes teaching is about toning down the emotional state of the students, making them less angry or afraid, which is a particular issue for me since I teach about war," he said.
Nevertheless, nothing is as important to Rosen as conveying to students the excitement that he himself feels about his subject.
"More than anything else, teaching is about making the students excited about the material, because if you can do that, they will teach themselves."
>SNIP<
- gretavo's blog
- Login to post comments

Wait...
You're not saying Hauser was a PNAC signer, are you? He wasn't, was he?
no...
...his sin is fabricating data. jeez, I didn't think my graphic or write-up were that confusing... :(
oh, and...
...Profs. Todd and Bloxham were not PNAC signers either...
Okay, I get it now...
"but I also haven't heard any PNAC signatories including Prof. Rosen tell the truth about 9/11. Certainly not the other fellow tagged below, Prof. (for now) Marc Hauser, who was found guilty not long ago of 8 instances of scientific misconduct (he cooked data to make it appear that his experiment succeded in supporting his hypothesis)."
I think this is what triggered my confusion, despite the nifty graphic. The juxtaposition of "any PNAC signatories" and "the other fellow tagged below" makes it sound on one level like Hauser was a PNAC signatory when in fact he is just a shady, data-fudging Harvard prof.
Hauser is part of the larger problem, which is the falling-down failure of the American scientific community to hew to the actual scientific method -- most conspicuous when it comes to 9/11, perhaps, but endemic to high stakes, highly-funded, high profile academia in other areas as well.
ah, I see...
...it does sound that way, and should not!
Where is the banner? On a
Where is the banner? On a related note, do we know who actually wrote the infamous "new pearl harbor" document? Zakheim signed it so he would be my guess....
here...
This is my setup from back when the banner still said "Hundreds of A&E". In the photo are a low-level "deanlet" who called the cops on me and said called cops, who understood as I did (but the deanlet did not) that I was on public property, not harvard's. And... i don't know who drafted the PNAC doc, but it doesn't really matter--what matters is who signed it, though I will repeat that it doesn't mean any of the signers necessarily were in on the 9/11 plot.
That's the thing
That's the thing though-don't you think at least one of them HAD to have been in on the plot? The wording is just too coincidental for me. I agree that most of the people who signed the document probably have no direct connection to 9/11 but I feel like the person or people who actually drafted the "pearl harbor" document probably are connected. In that sense it matters imho. Knowing who that person is would be one more piece of the puzzle, however small.
true
the drafter would be interesting to know...
on an unrelated note...
i'm guessing...
...not related, at this point. the mouths are similar, and the dark wavy hair (John seems to dye, though) but the noses are very different. plenty of videos of both speaking, I haven't checked for similarity in the voice...
HA! No joke here, that was
HA! No joke here, that was seriously the first thing I thought of when I saw the Stewart video and that his producers name was Albanese. I sort of just forgot about it though and figured maybe it really was just a coincidence. Where is John Albanese lately anyway? Haven't seen him slinking around 911b in awhile...
the master myth-maker
you are so right, Chris! again, after listening to this interview on Guns and Butter with Todd Fletcher, regarding Cass Sunstein, the name would be Phillip Zelikow...repeated references to a new pearl harbor. He's the master myth-maker. In this interview find listed the multiple pre-911 articles and trestises that alarmingly refer to an NPH
http://noliesradio.org/archives/23349
Zelikow is certainly a good
Zelikow is certainly a good candidate, though I don't think he was a PNAC signatory. Still its not a leap to think he worked closely with some of the people who were. I lean towards Zakheim just because in addition to signing the PNAC "pearl harbor" statement he more than anyone else who did(including Cheney) sign it appears to have operational connections to 9/11. Would be nice to somehow pin down if it actually was him who came up with the wording of the statement, one more nail through the coffin.
On a semi related note, Gordon Duff of Veterans Today is now promoting Sibel Edmonds. Which is a shame because Ive enjoyed a lot of his articles. You really can't trust anybody.
correction: 1 year away, not 4 years
Now I don't believe for a second that everyone who signed the PNAC document knew that a "catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor" was just 4 years away
The PNAC document, Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century which 'predicted' a "catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor" was actually published 1 year before 9/11.
my bad
I was looking at the date of their statement of principles... I will correct the blog entry!
it's late and i'm lazy
but i'm pretty sure a&e are promoting 911 truth news on facebook as THE place to go for 9/11 breaking news. -----transmission out...