Are you an agent, psyop, patsy, useful idiot, dupe, handler, or provocateur?

No, but thanks for wondering :)

I have to say yes, because most of those descriptions could apply to me since you don't specify what side of the "Truth" these concepts apply to, though I have only ever acted alone according to my convictions rather than being part of a team or organized action.

I also admit that for the majority of my life I have promoted the fallibility and elusiveness of all "truth" .(Societal not individual) as a committed postmodernist.

However 911 has forced me to abandon this ideology and I have since become a Post-Postmodernist and now fight for "The truth".

How fake is that?

I was "disinfo" for suggesting the CIT "fly over" theory didn't make sense, I was a "disrupter" for saying Jim Hoffman's "1.8 Million Ceiling Tile Bombs" was stupid, I was an "agent" for pointing out that Steven Jones' HAARP weapon distraction at the AE911Truth press conference was embarrasing, I was a "zionist megaphony" for saying that Israel was NOT the primary cause of 9/11, I was an "antisemite" for saying zionists had something to do with 9/11, I'm a "provocateur" for trying to get Ground Zero tested for high explosive residue, someone on this website say I am a "paid shill" for calling "Gregg" Roberts and Tom Sullivan (CDI: primary suspect) into question (till they had to post a correction to the article fixing the mistakes I was arguing about), and I am a "psyop" for daring to question the "nanothermite" story that is apparently now being slowly weeded out of our collective vocabulary.

Everyone is "disinfo" with the exception of DRG and a few who were involved in the movement early on, but they became disgusted with the whole thing or grew tired of being called "agents"

so the way I look at it, I'm not in bad company. I just wish it paid better.

"The future is not inherited, it is achieved." JFK