What if we post pics of every 9-11 airline passenger on truth sites and ask people to take pics if they are seen alive today.

which is somewhat more negative than I would have put it myself. The thing is, there is obviously negative PR baggage attached to this idea AND the kind of evidence that it would produce would be very weak. I'm tired of squinting at inconclusive photos.

Yes it may be perceived as insensitive, on the other hand we are numb to news of predator drone attacks in Pakistan, and the daily carnage in Afghanistan and Iraq. Continuing to attack those countries is i think a worse offense than dishonoring the already dead passengers, if they really are dead.

These alleged passengers, if found still alive and incognito are guilty of conpiracy in 9-11. If we have doubts about other actors, like who exactly wired wtc, we are left guessing, but who pretended to be airline passengers - we have names. If you want to question suspects with connections to the plotters, these guys did. They just have to be found.

double post

Love the idea. Gotta disagree with you Casseia, bad PR is something we will always live with until we are in the majority. Some of the "hijackers" turned up alive, I'm willing to bet some of the passengers might as well(more stolen ID's like the "hijackers"?)

 We have been told that there were four flights that experienced
hijackings on September 11, 2001.  We have not been shown anything close
to conclusive evidence that these flights boarded, took off, flew, and
crashed that day.  Instead it has been suggested that it is wrong to question the official version of events, for various reasons.  Among them, the idea that to do so is extremely upsetting to the families of the alleged victims.  With my sincerest dommages to any legitimate victim's family members to whom our skepticism causes emotional discomfort, here are a few possible categories, beginning with the official version...

The OCT:
All the passengers named in the official story are real people who really died when their planes were really crashed by real fanatical arab muslim hijackers.  They are to be honored, respected, and commemorated and (obviously) never have their legitimacy questioned.

The "Loose Change" version aka the Cleveland Swap version: At least one of the real 9/11 flights with real passengers actually landed somewhere, where the real passengers were killed by the real perpetrators, whoever they may have been (but probably the CIA, which also pretends to be al Qaeda. Or they might have been gassed, possibly through the on board margarine cup/enema bag emergency air system.  Think Northwoods.  Think alBushCiada.

The "everything is fake" version: The passengers who are not "famous" i.e. known to the public to have definitely existed before 9/11, are fictional people--little more than names on a piece of paper.  By offering Victim Compensation Fund payouts to anyone who lost a close relative (or claimed to) on 9/11, the perps could have the U.S. taxpayer bankroll their bribery of people to make the legal claim of the fictional passengers' existence.  And still the four 9/11 flights were supposed to have been on average a mere 30% occupied (which incidentally means it would be carrying less fuel than if it were overbooked).  The "flight manifests" that are publicly available are not originals, or even copies of originals, they are lists of names on a printout from some computer, so we can presume that the real manifests don't exist.  The famous passengers like Barbara Olson are either still alive or have died at some point in the years since 9/11 (including by possible foul play).  Faking your death is the best way to avoid paying taxes, and probably offers many people a welcome new lease on life as it were.

Any others?

to encourage people you don't know to stalk people, especially a group of people that may include genuine victims and their families even if it also includes many frauds.

i would have guessed the perps wouldn't leave anyone alive if they didn't have to (i.e. themselves)