Whodunnit?

Whodunnit?
I think that Bush is part of a crime family, but like all mafia, there are sometimes turf-wars. This time, the Bush Crime Family got outfoxed by another crime family. It seems reasonable to gather all the information we have about ALL the likely perpetrators of 9/11. Who could the criminals be? Let's see . . .
-who had spies in our country living next to the supposed hijackers?
-who was captured celebrating in view of the attacks, who had vans with explosives, cash, box-cutters, other people's passports?
-who failed lie-detector tests but were quietly allowed to leave the country on "visa violations?"
-who would like to pin the blame on Saudi Arabia?
-who called for a "new pearl harbor?"
-who wrote about the need to "secure the realm?" (bonus point: where is that realm?)
-who took ownership (with insurance terrorist rider) of the Twin Towers shortly before 9/11?
-who took out put options on the United and American Airlines?
-who was in charge of the 9/11 Commission?
-who owns the media?
-who owns congress?
-who owns most of the presidential candidates for the 2008 “election?â€
-who benefited from the invasion of Iraq?
-who is helping to foment unrest in Iraq, alongside US soldiers?
-who has an exalted history of engaging in false-flag terror attacks?
-who is trying to get us to invade Iran?
Guess who?
This list, drawn from memory, may represent the proverbial tip of the iceberg. Feel free to add more or critique as necessary.
Here is the ABSOLUTE best summary of Larry's links to 9/11 and "Israel" (meaning Mossad & the Likud wing of the Israeli gov't):
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/lehrman.htm
The above link provides details of Mossad’s involvement as well.
Here is an interesting read about how 9/11 "truth" that manages to avoid all the above details is allowed to slip through and appear in the mainstream media: http://www.iamthewitness.com/Bollyn-9-11-Controlling-the-Message.html
(FYI, I don’t know anything about Bollyn – have heard that he’s suspect but I don’t know why.)
Maybe Bush let it happen and the Israeli Mossad made it happen. LIHOP AND MIHOP. (FYI, I think that Cheney is definitely on the MIHOP side.) Unless Bush invades Iran, I predict that the media will try to pin 9/11 entirely on him. He was afterall in charge on 9/11 but went AWOL, he stalled an investigation, he wouldn't testify publically, under oath, or on his own. On the other hand, maybe the Mossad are using the threat of blaming Bush for 9/11 only as blackmail to invade. Afterall, if Bush testifies, he might point a few fingers.
(Then again, all they need to do is plant an intern in Bush's office, wait for the inevitable affair, and then threaten to reveal the affair. [Afterall, who saves a dress with semen on it? Any women you know?] As a twist on this technique, they kill the intern and frame the politician, aka Condit, Scarborough, etc. It's a mini-false flag attack. Or maybe they already have the goods on Bush already. Remember that gay fake reporter who visited the whitehouse a lot after hours? Wasn't he really a professional escort?)
Don’t get me wrong. I think that Bush is culpable. He probably isn't smart enough to have planned it - but I am sure he knew what was going down. Cheney probably just told him, "don't worry your pretty little head; I'll take care of everything." Certainly plenty of other Bush clan members were implicated. And Bush had to have signed the order taking guns away from pilots, he saw all the PDBs, etc. And since then he has done a bang-up job of destroying our country, our laws, our economy, our state of mind, and our relations with others abroad. He knowingly lied us into a war and is therefore directly responsible for the deaths and maimings (physically and psychologically) of our troops. And we have had close to one million Iraqis die as a direct result of the invasion; I don't know how many Afghanistanis. Untold millions are suffering, displaced, raped, their homes destroyed. But I still very much doubt that Bush and members of his administration were the _only_ ones.
Right now, the current lie is that it was 19 arab hijackers, mostly Saudis, who orchestrated the events of 9/11. Some people are, wittingly or not, framing the opposite of that story to be simply "bush did it," or "it was an inside job." Instead of allowing for the opposite to be "select members of our gov't working in concert or directed by persons from another country or sympathetic to another country." So Bush could be left to hang all by himself.
I do feel like our country has been taken over, with collusion from Bushies to be sure, but taken over nonetheless. By Israel.
I am afraid of a nuclear false-flag attack coming to the US to be blamed on Iran. Wake up!
- E Vero's blog
- Login to post comments

Additional link
Here is a great link for understanding the connection between the Israelis and 9/11:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm
The possibility of Mossad blackmailing Bush is very real, but...
they certainly won't use the exposure of 9/11 or of any other false-flag attack for blackmail. That would be giving away the store as far as Mossad is concerned, since no one else does false flag attacks more often than Mossad. It is their Modus Operandi.
Also, the fraudulent "War on Terror" must not be undermined in any way, it is just WAY TOO VALUABLE OF A MEME FOR THE MOSSAD to risk losing in such a way.
But, I do agree that the possibility of some form a blackmail to force Bush to invade Iran and attempt regime change is all to real and present. There are countless ways to blackmail Bush, just think about how many grounds for impeachment have accumulated so far. The Mossad does not have a shortage of tools in their toolbox to pull out and use against Bush. I agree with you that no matter how evil and psychopathic Bush is, he nevertheless has the Sward of Damocles over his head and knows he must always dance to the tune of the Zionists.
Yes, Keenan, what you say
Yes, Keenan, what you say makes sense.
Glad to read you over here! I feel like I've crossed over to a higher level of 9/11 truth (or at least more tolerant).
E
yep... i think the media role is key
anyone who thinks our media are not controlled isn't paying attention. When it comes to the thieve's code of silence, the biggest threat is to have the media suddenly expose a scandal and fixate on it. With Dubya, this could be a number of things from lack of service in the guard to DUI to having a gay lover--who knows!
a note on sources
I just wanted to point out that oftentimes we will come across good information from not the best source, and in this case I think serendipity may count as such. Not saying that it's not OK to post things from any source, but that it's good to make that extra effort to find the best source for something, since not everyone will intuitively know that it's the message that's important, not so much the messenger...
it's especially true of info on Zionism, which too often is made readily available by unsavory types who may well be legit or may just as well be Zionist plants intended to discredit criticism of Zionism...
just a reminder to understand how easy it can be to both fall for and avoid common pitfalls!
thank you, Gretavo
Hi Gretavo,
I thank you for your comment. I am a relative newbie; I don't want to use bad sources, but I may have. Those I listed seemed credible to me, but you could be right that they are not. I would like to be pointed to the very best evidence for who actually perpetrated the attacks on 9/11. Can you help me? I don't want to unnecessarily blame anyone; I just want to know the truth.
E
9/11 The Ultimate Truth
I probably already recommended this book to you on 911Blogger, but I just wanted to share this with everybody that this book, "9/11 The Ultimate Truth", is the only book on 9/11 that I know of that really analyzes the WHO and WHY behind the 9/11, including a thorough discussion of the whole Israel/Zionist role.
http://www.qfgpublishing.com/product_info.php?products_id=52
http://www.amazon.com/11-Ultimate-Truth-Laura-Knight-Jadczyk/dp/1897244223/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/105-4836443-8176462?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1181892844&sr=8-1
Also, check out the forum discussion on their alternative news website http://www.signs-of-the-times.org for some of the most intelligent, well researched, and credible information regarding the whole Zionism thing and 9/11, among other things. The forum is moderated, but it is probably the most intelligent and useful internet forum I've ever used.
They have excellent discussions regarding disinformation and credibility of sources and personalities within the alternative/conspiracy community. So far, their analysis has not led me wrong.
Thank you, Keenan. E
Thank you, Keenan.
E
yes, thanks keenan--will check it out
and E, newbie or not, we're all in the same boat around not knowing whom to trust. the only advice I can give you is to tread carefully, especially at first while you get your bearings. i tend to think more people are disinfo than others do which makes me one of the "paranoid" ones. but then I also don't think there's any way that some people aren't going to be disinfo so if you have to assume one way or the other it's best to go with skepticism. different people may have different reasons for trying to mislead, some people may spread disinfo simply because they think it's true. "trust no one" isn't exactly the way to go, but don't be too easy to trust is probably good advice. Take it slowly and just see what seems to make sense to you--don't be afraid to engage people--sometimes only by going back and forth few times with someone, and over a period of time, will things become clear one way or another. and finally, there are a bunch of people who are definitely not disinfo, they are the ones who still are only vaguely aware that there IS a truth movement. they are the public, and the more people we bring in from tehre, by showing them the basic problems with the official theory, the more honest people we'll have on our side. that's another way of saying don't spend all your time on the internet! :)
____
â™
Real Truther
"Truth will have no gods before it.- The belief in truth begins with the doubt of all truths in which one has previously believed."
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 - 1900)