Some Non-CIT/Flyover Pentagon Analysis for a Change of Pace

In other words, your reply to the Opening Post explanation is to spend a minute pasting Hoffman’s nonsense to this thread ‘and’ my job is to offer you a line-by-line rebuttal. Go start a “Hoffman Is Right!” thread and perhaps someone will offer rebuttals. Let’s suppose that this is your thread and I am looking at Hoffman’s Cover Story Propaganda and feel like pointing out ‘his’ errors. This is what I would like to see from anyone here (link is to your post above):

Always be wary when ANYONE begins spouting off about what ‘did not’ hit the Pentagon. This is right out of the DoD/FBI Counterintelligence/Disinformation Manual and Disinfo 101. If you want to talk about what ‘did not’ hit the Pentagon, then that includes Santa Claus and Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer, Bozo the Clown and a herd of wild elephants . . . And I smell a Loyal Bushie Disinfo Agent already . . .

So what? This guy is filling the reader’s head with nonsense and stupidity with his no-Boeing garbage. 

Are we noting the ‘double negatives’ that this guy uses to say nothing at all? :0) Now we have the “work of 9/11 researchers who DO NOT embrace the no-Boeing theory . . .”. Lord-Have-Mercy . . .

In other words, let’s explore the psychology, history and whatnot and forget all about what really hit the Pentagon at 9:31:39 AM on 9/11. :0)

This guy is talking about another essay as a cumulative argument, because he cares NOTHING about what really hit the Pentagon on 9/11 or any other day.

What is wrong with this picture? The focus for this paper is the ‘physical evidence’ of the Pentagon attack with pictures and information about THE BUILDING. These retards talk for hours about the size of the E-Ring entry hole, because they have no evidence that any 100-Ton Jetliner ever crashed at the Pentagon, except for “Because Senor Bushie and Rummy told me so . . .”.  This guy here is going to talk about the physics of ‘aircraft crashes’ in general, because of his lack of evidence here at the Pentagon for any serious thesis paper at all. This guy could not debate me in person one-on-one for five minutes and remain on the stage, because he would be laughed out of the place.

In other words, get ready for a lot of BS about the little empty hole. :0)

The Official Cover Story says AA77 hit the Pentagon at 9:38 AM (Page 200 PDF), so this guy either agrees with the Cover Story or has a conspiracy theory of his own based upon some kind of evidence. 

Bullony. ‘The’ 911Truth says exactly what ‘all’ the evidence says without creating a single contradiction, once you have waded through and discarded the disinformation. The eyewitness testimony is required to establish any credible timeline for carrying out any serious investigation.

This guy is guilty of creating his own ‘no-Boeing theory’ lingo to start this bogus paper. :0)

Bull, bull and more bull on a stick. Where is the evidence for any of these statements? :0) A real Boeing 757-200 Jetliner includes over 60 tons of high grade aluminum/titanium alloy for the frame and two 6-ton Rolls-Royce engines that were NEVER found at the Pentagon. If anybody here has that kind of evidence (none exists), then go right ahead and paste that to this thread. I have already shown you expert military witnesses saying that real Boeing 757 DID NOT hit the Pentagon (6 minute video). This guy is talking about building ‘damage’ like that is going to produce 100 tons of Jetliner wreckage and squeeze all of that inside a tiny little 18-feet 3-inch hole (pic) above those 7-feet tall cable spools. :0) You want to talk about interior damage? Okay. Here is a look through the C-Ring Hole back across the 220 feet C-E ring section under the single roof:

Does someone want to explain how one of these 100-Ton Jetliners (pic) going 530 miles per hour (heh) blasts through the E-ring wall ON THE FIRST FLOOR, without touching this green SUV:

A man can stand on the top of that SUV and reach up to the elevation of that second story slab that is STILL THERE. The two windows to the left of the little impact hole are not even broken and no windows on the third floor are broken either (damage schematic). You want us to believe that an almost 50-feet tall 125-feet wide 100-ton Jetliner just passed right over the cable spools (pic) and the green SUV (another pic), when this Hoffman guy has not even shown us one bit of evidence to support any explanation at all. Here is the deal in a nutshell if anyone is paying attention: Anyone who believes a real 100-Ton Jetliner (like this) with these massive wing sections and massive landing gear assemblies (pic), and over 200 seats, really crashed into the Pentagon (heh) has been DUPED by Senor Bushie and the inside-job bad guys with the help of their little helpers like Hoffman right here with his ridiculous Disinformation Propaganda.

Now, someone please go back up to the OP and ‘quote >>’ anything that appears off to provide these readers an explanation for SOMETHING, so I can begin drafting my defending arguments. :0)

GL,

Terral 

I have spent years running my own 911Truth Investigation and likely know more about these cases than the average bear or park ranger. :0)

Thank you for posting the links for those yet to figure out that a painted-up A-3 Jet hit the Pentagon at exactly 9:36:27 AM (lower pic).

The WTC case and the controlled demolition of those skyscrapers have NOTHING to do with any crashing Jetliner, kerosene (Jet fuel is kerosene) or anything remotely related to any Jetliner at all. My interpretation of the evidence says that Flight 93 (my Loose Change thread) was supposed to hit WTC-7, but the ‘Inside-Job Plan’ went haywire and the inside-job bad guys had to improvise. Was WTC-7 (my Loose Change thread) hit by any jetliner? No. And yet, the 47-story skyscraper collapsed at freefall speed like WTC-1 and WTC-2. :0) Do the math . . .

GL,

Terral

Hi Terral

PLEASE post your OP on this forum where I also post:

There are PLENTY of people there who still believe the official story, they will definitely challenge your conclusions!!!!!

http://forums.mmaweekly.com/showthread.php?t=12832&page=3

D'oh! I posted the other two OP's (Flight 93 and WTC-7) on 'this' Prison Planet Forum in this 9/11 room, before realizing that your request is to take these things elsewhere. :0) No thank you. I really do not spend much time writing on these 911Truth topics anymore, but you are welcome to post links to my work on that Board if that makes Mark happy. :0)

GL,

Terral

I had always thought it odd, within minutes of the alleged flight 77 hitting the Pentagon the FBI went to the Citgo gas station confiscating the CCTV videos then proceeded to go to the Double Tree and grab theirs.

Also the other thing that I never believed, for one second-- we are suppose to believe that one of the most highly secured areas, like the Pentagon, had no other CCTV photos of the plane hitting the building.  Nor were there any missiles defending the pentagon because an intruder had entered their airspace.

Then I found it even more discrediting-- the Ted Olson recollection of talking to his wife Barbara. 

Nevertheless, what you put together is outstanding!

We agree. Consider the fact that the FBI have never turned over a single ‘time-change part’ (story) to prove they are even in possession of ANY 9/11 Jetliner, then you realize this has been an inside-con-job all along. The Government is lying and Bush/Rove/Cheney are trying to get away with murdering innocent Americans.

We agree. There are “five extremely sophisticated anti-missile batteries in place to protect the Pentagon from an airborne attack” (story), but the inside-job bad guys disabled the system under Cheney’s ‘stand down’ order (short Norman Mineta video).

Then I found it even more discrediting-- the Ted Olson recollection of talking to his wife Barbara. 

The inside-job bad guys carried out assassinations (Carol Valentine’s story) for days after these 9/11 attacks ‘and’ certain victims were assigned seats on these bogus Jetliners part of their counterintelligence/disinformation cover up campaign. Barbara Olson had a big mouth and paid the price for being someone who could possibly blow the inside-job bad guy’s cover.

GL,

Terral 

ok i'll make this quick.

You obviously have some research into aviation and specifically plane parts found in the wreakage.  Who in your team of researchers is an aviation expert?

I noticed you have some experience as a demolitions expert.  Can you exspand on this please. 

Dear wikipdeiaisnotFACT,

Would you like to enlighten me as to what happend in your opinion at the Pentagon on 911 ?

The guy is here to harass the topic starter without any intentions of addressing ‘the topic’ of this thread. There is no evidence to support the Official Cover Story LIE, so this guy calls people names and hopes that nobody will notice. :0)

What has Wikiguy ‘quoted >>’ from the Opening Post to prove wrong using his evidence? Nothing. :0)

GL,

Terral

Jim Hoffman has done more for 9/11 research than you will ever dream of doing, and you have the nerve to call him disinformation? This from a disinfo queen who has been tossed off of every board they've ever posted on, including this one.

Hoffman is right, and you are wrong.