Truth 2.0.1

New Hampshire is acting out again, initiating something that sounds like NYCCAN. That's fine and it gets good coverage here http://sentinelsource.com/articles/2010/01/30/news/local/free/id_388463....

What perplexes me, however, is heretofore uncontemplated interpretation of events put forward by former Keene mayor and "Vote for Answers NH" supporter Michael Blastos...

Blastos likens the final report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, also known as The 9/11 Commission Report, to the Warren Commission Report on the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

“In my life span so far, there’s been two investigations or commission reports that have totally mesmerized me by the lack of investigation and cover-ups,” he said. “I’m hoping that if enough people speak with one voice, we can come up with an explanation as to what actually happened on 9/11.”

So far, so good, amirite?

Blastos has participated in several 9/11 “truth” public events, often introducing speakers who questioned the official explanation of the attacks — that two hijacked airliners smashing into the Twin Towers resulted in the collapse of both buildings along with other nearby structures.

Like many others who are calling for a new investigation, Blastos believes explosives brought the towers down.

Yeah baby, keep it coming...

“It was a beautifully controlled demolition,” he said. “I don’t know who is to blame, whether Americans did it with money from al-Qaida or what, but obviously it was wired. In that, I feel I’m correct.”

Who did it with the what now? Americans did it with money from al Qaeda? Al Qaeda outsourced a huge part of their terror op to Americans? Really? Did this guy misspeak (like, he meant al Qaeda did it with money from the US, perhaps in the form of 100,000 IPN or International Porkchop Notes) or is he actually suggesting that, for example, bin Laden contracted with Controlled Demolition Inc.?