The New Pentagon Debate: Lying Eyewitnesses vs. Sketchy CIT

"Griffin is known widely in the 9/11 Truth movement for his 8 + books dedicated specifically to numerous questions, inaccuracies, omissions, and distortions surrounding the September 11th, 2001 attacks as they have been wrongly preserved in history by the 9/11 Commission Report and the following N.I.S.T. Reports."

Griffin is also well known for his Big Tent approach which has been rejected by many serious 9-11 researchers. Griffin insists that there was no Boeing crash at the Pentagon, has endorsed CIT, whom I consider to be the worst of the available 9-11 disinformation, speaks highly of perceived suspicious characters Rob Balsamo and Morgan Reynolds, and has maintained his relationship with the now discredited Jim Fetzer and his "scholars" group. These are the kind of things that Cheri Roberts wants us to ignore and these are the kind of people that Cheri Roberts wants us to "come together" with under the big tent. I don't know about the rest of you but you can count me out.

Griffin has failed to respond to evidence which contradicts the absolute statements which he made on the National Geographic hit piece where he said unequivocally that AA77 did not hit the Pentagon. Jim Hoffman had tried to get Griffin to look at ALL the evidence including http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/index.html, to no avail. Griffin simply failed to respond as if he is above criticism. He also spends an inordinate amount of time during his lectures "proving" that cell phone fakery was used on 9-11. Despite his early contributions to the movement, Griffin does not get a free pass with the information as if he is above reproach. It's really too bad because Griffin's deteriorating credibility may catch up with him one day as many in the movement are beginning to reject his hodgepodge of good and bad info. I can't say much about it yet, but let's just say that Colorado, one of the most prolific and active 9-11 groups in the country, is fixin to send a strong message to the good Dr. "Clean it up or you will not be welcome here.... " Credibility is everything in this movement, credibility to the general public, and credibility within the movement itself.

Which brings me to, IMO, the least credible person on this website who posted this story. I do not see it as any coincidence that a pusher of disinformation and admitted sock puppet like Adam Syed is first to jump on board the big tent band wagon. People who wish to discredit our movement want us all under the same big tent so that they can criticize us as a group that will believe anything put in front of them. They want us arguing endlessly over minutia, wasting time, bickering back and forth, and generally putting forth the worst information about 9-11 as if it's fact or "proven". All this gives the media attack dogs fodder with which to use to discredit us.

A good example is used above from the NG hit piece where Griffin makes his absolute statement that AA77 did not hit the Pentagon and then you see NG have a heyday with this unproven and debunked bit of misinformation.

This is how the game is played. Over the past several months I have grown to seriously question the motifs of Adam Syed. At times, he has turned this website into a circus of disinformation and done all of the disruptive things mentioned above. His relentless and often dishonest pimping of CIT has become increasingly more and more suspicious to me and many others. More recently, Mr. Syed was caught praising himself as a sock puppet, a deceptive and dishonest practice which is heavily frowned upon in the cyber world. I am shocked that the management at this website has chosen to allow this dishonest disruptor on the site at all. It's a huge disappointment and blow to the credibility of this website and it's owners, like it or not guys. So it should come as no surprise that Mr. Syed is now pimping the big tenter Cheri Roberts and DRG. Don't be fooled. There is a reason some people want the big tent in effect and it has nothing to do with sitting around the fire singing Kumbaya.

Finally, some, including Mr. Syed are sure to cry to the management at this site about my posting today. It should be known that these are my opinions intermingled with facts about the topic at hand. I have a right to state my opinion here and also to state some pertinent facts. Many have trumpeted the use of the term "disinformation" is an attack. I, however, beg to differ. Merriam-Webster define disinformation as:

dis·in·for·ma·tion
Pronunciation: \(?)dis-?in-f?r-?m?-sh?n\
Function: noun
Date: 1939
false information deliberately and often covertly spread (as by the planting of rumors) in order to influence public opinion or obscure the truth

It cannot be argued that Adam Syed is deliberately spreading false information "in order to influence public opinion". It is arguable if these intentions are meant to obscure the truth. My opinion is that this is part of Syed's intentions, however, this I cannot prove and do not state it as fact, but my opinion which I am entitled to. Adam and CIT repeatedly assert that the ludicrous "fly over" theory is proven fact and they want to shove it down our throats.This is false information which is being deliberately and aggressively spread, which fits the definition of disinformation. I think the use of the term in the context that I have used it is appropriate.