Update on Architects and Engineers Activity From Richard Gage
http://www.ae911truth.org/info/146
Jan 20, 2010
What’s Next for AE911Truth?
— Richard Gage, AIA
How will we match and surpass the tremendous successes that we achieved in 2009? Let's start with a press conference and celebration highlighting our 1,000 Architects and Engineers — all of whom have staked their professional reputations and credibility — demanding a new investigation of the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11.
Next we're off to Philadelphia, PA, where (not for the first time) we attend a conference with a name unbefitting of the focused mission of AE911Truth — the Treason in America conference on March 6 and 7 — on 9/11: Blueprint for Truth — the evidence for the engineered destruction of the 3 WTC skyscrapers on 9/11. Betsy Metz is the local coordinator at this 2-day non-partisan truth conference with speakers, movies and music discussing what's really going on in our country, at the Valley Forge Convention Center.
Then we're off to Denver in mid-March (Tentatively set for March 20th) to be back on the air to 200,000 people live at KBDI PBS TV. Executive producer, Shari Bernson, has requested our return to the station to debate a proponent of the official story. We hope that physicist Dave Thomas of the New Mexico Tech Institute, with whom we had a debate style presentation on Oct 24, 2009, will appear with us in this more structured debate, in which we can show our evidence on-screen during the interaction.
This should prove much more informative, and to some extent at least, entertaining to the TV viewing audience than the radio debate that we had on January 10th with explosives expert Ron Craig.
In May we will be honored to speak alongside prolific 9/11 scholar David Ray Griffin, whose voice I first heard on the radio almost four years ago now presenting the "Explosive Testimony" about at the WTC from the firefighters. JF Ranger is arranging this powerful assembly on Monday, May 3. Conference details will be released on World911Truth.org, but the event is expected to take place at a large university downtown with a seating capacity up to 700. The entire conference is expected to be broadcast live on the Internet.
- gretavo's blog
- Login to post comments
"a conference with a name unbefitting"
is how he refers to the LIHOP-heavy conference Jon Gold's protegé Betsy Metz is organizing in March. that is a small but great touch.
aren't certain "truthers" always telling us not to present theories as facts? TREASON IN AMERICA!!! that sure sounds like someone is a priori defining 9/11 as a crime committed by Americans, and if you examine the words of people like Jon Gold and Sander Hicks they do indeed seem to think that they have solved the case, and that "the Bush Crime Family and Dark Prince Cheney" hatched and executed the plot to allow their al Qaeda patsies to attack America in order to increase their already vast oil wealth, just the latest in their historic crimes including funding Hitler and the Nazis and murdering JFK.
Nowhere, however, do they cite anything but circumstancial evidence for their accusations. Did Bush or Cheney rig Larry Silverstein's buildings for him? Did they guide the planes into the towers? Did they plant explosives in the Pentagon? Don't get me wrong--they are guilty as hell of a cover-up, there is no question about that. But that is a far cry from proof of their direct complicity in things like the demolition of Silverstein's properties with people inside.
The king who asks, only half rhetorically "Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?" may be guilty of something, but whoever takes the hint and does the deed is the true perpetrator...
Treason
First, I am not Jon Gold's protege ... I'm an independent truth activist, doing my own thing, period. Second, "treason in America" applies to many things this conference is about: wars based on lies, sending our troops in based on lies, torture directives from the very top, end runs around the U.S. Constitution, to say the least, and yes, actual treason based on the cover-up of 9/11 alone. You don't think Cheney's stand-down at the Pentagon was treason? I get your point, but the term "treason" didn't necessarily apply to WTC7 alone, though I would argue that the cover-up of WTC7 could be defined as treason. I believe I'm correctly calling a spade a spade even if we don't know specifically who or what groups were behind it.
what stand down order?
thanks for responding. how do you know cheney's orders were to NOT shoot down the plane? what if his orders were "if the plane remains on this course, engage it if it comes within 5 miles and bring it down" and in trying to carry out the orders, those tasked with shooting the plane down with an anti-aircraft missile failed, either through bad luck, sabotage, or the fact that no plane in the air at the time corresponded to whatever blip they may have been tracking? how responsible is it to assume what the orders given by cheney were and on that basis accuse him of a capital offense? im not saying that i know for a fact he wasn't involved, but i think some people, like Jon, need to practice what they preach...
how do allegations of treason help our credibility?
where you or I may see obvious evidence of betrayal, others may well consider the charge at best unproven. does it help us to employ that kind of rhetoric when a clear part of the campaign to make us look bad is to paint us as unhinged fanatics?
ae911truth's WTC7 flash movie
A couple years ago ae911truth posted to 911b the coding to post their WTC7 flash movie wherever you want, websites, messageboards, etc (hint hint WTCD!).
I used to post the shit out of it at my formerly main news/discussion site, and it drove the resident "no evidence of WTC CD, scary moozlems did 911, yada yada" shill-a-thon there so nuts, they were finally successful in usurping management and having me perma-banned, citing their own purely fabricated "reason".
The attention grabbing power of seeing 7's perfect CD, combined with the gravitas of 1000+ licensed A's & E's publicly calling a duck a duck, is just plain toxic to the Limited Hangout LIHOP shills.