ICTS and the would be christmas-day massacre

to clarify, what has been released are still frames from the Portland Maine airport and still frames from Dulles, purporting to show "the hijackers". If indeed the security companies at some point held the actual tapes showing "the hijackers", those tapes would presumably have been seized by the FBI as part of their investigation. Either way, we know that no tapes of the alleged hijackers have been released, so we cannot assume that they exist. In fact I lean towards the belief that they do not exist because no hijackers boarded any aircraft on 9/11. Again, if no hard evidence can be shown that "the hijackers" boarded planes on 9/11, then we must treat that as an unproven allegation. And as such, the idea that any airport security company is to blame for security lapses leading to 9/11 are unfounded. This seems to be not only a red herring but an insidious way to support the OCT vis a vis the arab-muslim hijacker narrative. In fact, perhaps the clear cases of "would-be underwear bombers" being allowed to slip by security that have been highlighted recently are intended to make us think that something similar happened on 9/11, when in fact no such thing did. This is why we should focus on the scene of the worst crime--the demolition of the twin towers on top of occupants and rescue workers--NOT the muddled alleged hijacker narrative.