Fake Truth 2.0?
We've discussed the possibility that the LIHOP cabal might eventually seek an explanation for the obvious explosions at the WTC which maintains the centrality of al Quesadilla -- most recently with regard to Kevin Ryan's oddly hijacker-centric essays. In that same vein, here's an instructive exchange taken from the thread about Chomsky admitting the possibility of LIHOP. From 911blogger, beginning with this comment from Jon Gold http://www.911blogger.com/node/21782#comment-221148...
For the record...
For those browsing this site, I do not think William Rodriguez is a liar. He is a friend of mine. He recently asked me to watch his upcoming movie, and it was great. When Willie was touring the world, he would send me updates to post to this site, and I did so for years. Just yesterday I wished him well for Rosie's show. So, there is a liar here, but it's not Willie, and it's not me.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? The facts speak for themselves.
Submitted by Jon Gold on Fri, 11/06/2009 - 8:44am.
William R
What does he think about you not being able to understand controlled demolition of the Towers?
He hasn't been able to convince you there were explosions ? I'm having a bit of disconnect here.
Please explain your theories Jon.
Submitted by Binkster on Fri, 11/06/2009 - 11:42am.
William Rodriquez...
Does not talk about "Controlled Demolition." He tells his story, which mentions explosions in the basement. He doesn't go any further than that. This has been discussed on this site before. So there's no disconnect, except from you, and the truth.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? The facts speak for themselves.
Submitted by Jon Gold on Fri, 11/06/2009 - 11:59am.
1 + 1
As far as I know controlled demolitions involve explosives of some kind...
What do you think ?
Submitted by Binkster on Fri, 11/06/2009 - 12:12pm.
And so do bombs...
Which wouldn't be a "Controlled Demolition." I'm done talking to you now.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? The facts speak for themselves.
Submitted by Jon Gold on Fri, 11/06/2009 - 12:14pm
The central point of interest (apart from the fact that he can't keep the spelling of his good friend's name straight from one post to another) is obviously the "bombs in the basement" notion that Gold appears to be floating here. Bombs could indeed explain Willie's testimony regarding explosions and the injuries to Felipe David. Bombs could have been planted by terrorists... perhaps terrorists who had been scoping out the WTC and its bathrooms in the weeks prior to 9/11, as per Rodriguez's less-known assertion. What basement bombs obviously can't explain is the total top-down explosive demolition of the Towers... yet. Keeping a close eye on the ongoing effort to incorporate the undeniable evidence of demolition into a LIHOP narrative -- and thus to preserve the all-important central role of our imaginary enemies in AfPak, al Talibaqaeda -- should be a top priority for real truthers.
- casseia's blog
- Login to post comments
very adaptive, these fake truthers, yes.
excellent post, Cass. and I hate to break it to the fake truthers, but this latest (and so obviously predictable) change in strategy isn't going to help them much. that they are even floating it at this point is a sign of how desperate they are. they're doing us all a favor by trying, though. in order to prosecute the fake truthers for being accessories after the fact, we will need as many people as possible to understand the nature of their assistance to the cover-up, and these pathetic 4th quarter gambles, doomed as they are to fail, help towards that end.