RT's Report From the Field, and a Call to Collaboration

Just had a nice conversation with a person of ******** heritage who stopped to say that they had been interested in some of the 9/11 truth stuff for a while but had given up on it for whatever reason. During our conversation it became clear that while this was a very well educated and well informed person of good consicence (peace activist, etc.) they believed that no matter what else was true about 9/11, the terrorists who flew the planes into the buildings are horrible people who most reasonable people from their country detest for good reason. They had not heard of David Griffin so I'm not sure what kind of crap may have led them to lose interest/cling to the Islamofascist myth, etc.

It seems to me that there are probably lots of people like this, who mistakenly think that 9/11 truth somehow implies a defense or justification of terrorists. I explained the notion of the protection racket and how some radicals are useful idiots, but also that we didn't, as they thought, know for sure that the planes that day were hijacked by such radicals.

Everyone we encounter in the streets will have their own reasons for resisting the truth. We need to understand and categorize these reasons and share with each other the best methods of helping them to overcome those psychological barriers. If I have time I'll do it later, but if someone wants to get the ball rolling that would be much appreciated.

What are the categories of denial into which people fall? What are the best ways to reach each type, enough to at least plant a seed that might grow over time if not snap them out of their denial outright?