What's Up With 'Snowcrash's' Idiotic Insistance That 9/11 Was Both LIHOP and MIHOP?

...it's jew-hatred!

Steve Rosen: CIA, FBI paranoid about Mossad

Oct. 21, 2009

E.B. SOLOMONT, JPost correspondent in NEW YORK , THE JERUSALEM POST
Charges of espionage against US Defense Department scientist Stewart Nozette reflect "extreme views" against Israel that could harm US-Israel relations, former AIPAC staffer Steve Rosen told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday.

Rosen, AIPAC's former foreign policy chief who was accused, with Keith Weissman, of passing along classified information, said it was revealing that Israel was inserted into the narrative of Nozette's entrapment and subsequent arrest. The case against Rosen and Weissman was dismissed last spring.

"One of the things that our case revealed is the very extreme views that are held by some in counterintelligence agencies of the CIA and FBI about Israel," Rosen said. "They believe that the Mossad spied on the US on a huge scale and they believe that the Pollard case was the tip of some sort of iceberg.

"When you keep repeating that the Mossad is spying on America, Israel is harming the United States, of course it harms the alliance between Israel and the US," he continued. "The current case is even more peculiar because the government of Israel did nothing.

"It's revealing that they used Israel for the sting," Rosen added. "They could have used China, or others. But they chose Israel."

Describing an "obsession" with Israel within certain parts of the CIA and FBI, Rosen said if his own case had gone to trial, details reflecting the extreme views of his investigators would have come out. "There was no wrongdoing," he said, reflecting on the case against him and Weissman.

"But we go through this all the time. There is a faction in the counterintelligence bureaucracies that is fomenting these tales," he said. "They are methodically trying to create the impression that Mossad is under every bed."

Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said the Nozette case is part of a "troubling" pattern of targeting Israel and Jews as potential spies against the United States.

"I am not naïve enough to believe that there aren't efforts to obtain information in all kinds of ways," Foxman said. But, he asked, "Why is it that we don't hear of any other country, except for Israel? I find that troubling."

The US Defense Department has repeatedly singled out Jewish employees for possible disloyalty, Foxman said. The situation has escalated, with increasing cases of Jews having difficulty obtaining security clearance. If you have relatives in Israel, speak Hebrew, or practice Orthodox Judaism, he said, "changes are, you won't get clearance. That's the mindset out there."

Weissman's attorney in the AIPAC case, Baruch Weiss, said he knew very little about Nozette, only what he read in media reports.

However, "this case certainly raises the legitimate question of whether this was a legitimate sting or whether it was an unfairly selective sting aimed at Jews to test dual loyalty," Weiss said.

Couldn't Griffin at least point out who ran security at the airpoirts used on 9/11? Or point out Silversteins political connections? Or at least mention the names Zakheim and Suter occasionally, if not as much as he does the names Bush/Cheney? The guy doesn't have to connect the dots and say what seems most likely, that Zionists/Israeli interests played a major(leading?)role in 9/11, but wouldn't it be nice if he at least mentioned some of the evidence in passing?

 I understand the entire debate is basically controlled and that speaking certain truths gets you unfairly labeled as an anti-semite, but how long do we let the perps and their partisans control the debate? 

 I'm not saying we should criticize Griffin too hard, I own at least 5  of his books and his work has served me very well. But for better or worse(I would agree it has been mostly for the better), he is the single most influential name in the movement and he is quite possibly letting the real perps off the hook. I wanna get Cheney too, but I would be extremely dissapointed if thats where the accountability ended. 

 No offense to Barrett or Bollyn, but if Griffin was presenting a lot of the same evidence(of zionist/israeli involvement) they do it would have a much bigger impact based on Griffins status in the movement. Again, I don't need him to connect all the dots per se, but why seemingly ignore all evidence that points to Israel? It's not enough to say-"they'll call him anti-semitic" imho. We should be prodding(not harassing or bashing) people like Griffin to go further, not self censor. Blaming Bush is only going to get us so far, at some point we are going to have to start naming more names.