Fake Truthers Utilize Identical MO of the perps: Fear

One of the dead giveways of fake truthers like John Albanese, Jon Gold, Victoria, Jim Hoffman, jimd@#$%!^&*, Arabesque, Julian, and the rest of the usual suspects is their consistent employment of identical tactics and false arguments that are the MO of the perps and their controlled media. Most reasonable people unserstand this, but the fakes consistently and unapologetically pretend to not understand that this tends to expose their anti-truth agenda to the rest of the movement.
Fear is one of the most blatant disinfo tactics that they've been trotting out lately. Bruno of WeAreChangeLA lays it out pretty succinctly:
http://www.truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=33990#33990
bbruhwiler8
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:38 am Post subject:
Frank Legge's essay wrote:
The situation to bear in mind is that the perpetrators may be keeping evidence in reserve which will prove that a 757 did hit the Pentagon. This evidence would be their insurance policy. If they feel endangered by the progress of public opinion toward demanding a new investigation, and realizing that this will likely lead to criminal charges and convictions, they will produce this evidence. As many members of the 9/11 truth movement believe that no 757 hit the Pentagon, this evidence will throw the movement into disarray and create crippling loss of credibility over issues which are far more important. It will become very difficult to argue convincingly that explosives were used at the WTC.
Is that what all the fraud from Jim Hoffman is about? Really? He and others are betting against the truth because of what the perpetrators might conjure up in the future? You think they may produce video footage of a plane magically flying into the Pentagon? Are they going to produce footage that shows Flight 93 magically disappearing underground? Or is this just a ploy being used by cointelpro to con you into sweeping the Pentagon evidence under the rug?
Here is the difference between the Pentagon and Pennsylvania vs. the Twin Towers. The Twin Towers and everything inside were turned into powder in 10 sec, so the perpetrators have an excuse for not finding all the plane parts. They don't have that excuse for the Pentagon and Pennsylvania.
If they all of a sudden produce video of a plane disappearing into the Pentagon, then we can use the fact that no plane parts were found to wake the people up. The same goes for Pennsylvania. If the plane really flew into the ground, or even if it was shot out of the air, then you would still find large plane parts and human carnage.
In the meantime, I am not going to stand by while Hoffman, Legge, and anybody else here tries to use fear of what the enemy might do in order to suppress evidence about the deception at the Pentagon. The enemy uses fear as their primary weapon. I see no need for anyone who cares about the Truth Movement to use fear to suppress evidence... evidence that wakes people up quickly.
_________________
With you in the struggle,
Bruno
WeAreChangeLA
- Keenan's blog
- Login to post comments

excellent point
self-similarity...
Another reason why it is ridiculous to fear monger over
the threat of the perps conjuring up videos of AA77 hitting the Pentagon is that the perps would just paint themselves into a worse corner and their "insurance policy" would not save them. They would then have to explain why, if the new video is for real, they had previously released fraudulent security video frames through the FOIA requests, fraudulent NTSB data, fraudulent animation, fraudulent Sheraton hotel video, etc, because those would necessarily be in total conflict with a video showing an actual 757 on the official flight path. And that is assuming that their fake video would be able to fool video experts, which is extremely unlikely due to the fact that video fakery experts can usually easily tell if fake moving objects were inserted into a video because of the extreme difficulty in getting all the artifacts and shadows and what not correct. But even in the case that they somehow justify all their previously apparently faked forgeries, they are then on record of admitting that for years and years - going on 8 years now - they had been releasing fake and fraudulent videos and data, so then they have shot themselves in the foot. Why after that would people ever take their word for it any more and accept any new video as legitimate? They will have destroyed their credibility. In short, they would be just as much, if not more screwed than they already are, if they tried to pull something like that off. So, their choice is to either continue to allow more and more people to discover the Pentagon anomalies, guaranteeing that the number of people becoming skeptics of the 9/11 OCT will keep increasing, or to try to conjure up a future "Gotcha" video in which they would then have to admit that they have been engaging in fraud all these years. Seriously, what are people who are allegedly truth advocates really so worried about? Those are two really bad alternatives for the perps and both are really good for the truth movement. No wonder the perps are so worried about the Pentagon that they have focused more of their effort on damage control and disinformation on it than on just about any other part of the OCT.
For an allegedly intelligent and scientific person as Dr. Legge supposedly must be, he doesn't appear to have really thought through how utterly ridiculous and unlikely his "precautionary principle" (read fear mongering) pleading - that the movement risks being embarrassed by some future conjuring up of AA77 evidence by the perps - really is.
Another reason why it is ridiculous to fear monger over
As long as the press, mass media, and government remains absolutely totalitarian, and the 911 truth websites are a 99.9% CIA monopoly, the perps have nothing to fear.
There is a real reason to fear the truth, however. There would be anarchy. What are we going to do, arrest the entire government? The only remedy is a coup d'etat and martial law, along with general amnesty. As soon as the truth leaks out, it is inevitable. Israel must also be reassured that it will not be attacked to prevent it from resorting to the Sampson option. Nor would any persecution of Jews, journalists or politicians be tolerated.
Glasnost was possible in Russia because the government had sufficient power to maintain order. Our government is totalitarian and weak. Besides, our system of government was never any good, and democracy is as delusional as the communist utopia. It is time to face reality and choose between fake democracy or no democracy. Fake democracy means stagnation, social decay and ever more Orwellian lies.