LIHOPper Jon Gold All But Tells Dr. Graeme MacQueen to F*** Off
Dr. MacQueen is ten times the truther Jon Gold is.
demolition
Jon: As a personal list of facts gathered from your own perspective and with your own priorities, I think this is great. Well done. But I take it one of your aims has been to show that evidence of controlled demolition is merely one among a whole series of difficulties the official narrative faces. And I assume it's for this reason that your piece is light on the facts about the collapses of the WTC buildings. Point #45 dealing with CD (at least in the list I'm using--hope it's not out of date) is quite tentative ("dispute" and so on) and also quite vague. There are actually many separate and solid facts that have been pointed to and which aren't vague at all. I guess that's why some people are upset at the list. I suspect we could come up with over 20 separate facts about the collapses without difficulty.
Not really a criticism, just a comment.
The question of how those buildings came down...
Does NOT define this cause. So yea, I guess you could say one of my "aims has been to show that evidence of controlled demolition is merely one among a whole series of difficulties the official narrative faces."
I'm not Richard Gage, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, Jim Hoffman or Willie Rodriguez. I am Jon Gold, and I do my own thing.
There's about 7 years worth of heart and soul in this article. If it isn't good enough for certain people in this movement, then that's fine. It wasn't meant for those people anyway.
Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?
.
- gretavo's blog
- Login to post comments
Ah, come on
Saying that "Dr. MacQueen is ten times the truther Jon Gold is" Just doesn't do justice to Dr. MacQueen. That statement makes it sound like Jon actually wants the truth to come out, or that, on balance, Jon Gold is working for the truth. But, once you weigh the balance of Jon's various efforts and look at how much of it goes into propping up the islamofascist myth, I would think that Jon's value would drop into the negative column, meaning that Jon isn't even 10% the worth of Dr. MacQueen. In fact, Jon would be worth a negative percentage of Dr. MacQueen, instaed of a positive percentage.
you know i did think of that
the negative percentage--but I thought it might be too abstruse...