Citizen Investigation Team...

and sorry for the delay in ppublishing your comments! no 757 at the Pentagon was also my first encounter with skepticism, and that led to building 7, which I learned about from "in Plane Site". it wasn't until loose change 2nd ed. came out tho that I felt confident enough about the facts to screen it for my friends and family, who finally understood my interest. none of these are/were perfect sources, but the important thing is that they got me thinking--and acting.

Despite what fakes like Hoffman, Victoria, Arabesque, etc., claim about how talking about skepticism of no 757 crash at the Pentagon hurts the movement and turns people off, I've personally met multiple people who were first brought into the truth movement because of the Pentagon anomaly. Personally, the Pentagon was the second thing about 9/11 that made me a truther, right after I discovered the WTC demolitions.

I know somebody personally who lived in DC on 9/11 and was an independent journalist. He was one of the first who arrived on the scene at the Pentagon, and he told me that he became a 9/11 skeptic from day one when he saw that there was no friggin way that a jetliner could have crashed at the Pentagon based on what he observed.

The Pentagon is what got me started as well. I laugh at people who tell us not to talk about the Pentagon. People like Hoffman are losing credibility every day though, and it's great to see more people see places like 911blogger for what they are. Welcome to a site that doesn't have any thought police.

Ron! I was banned from 911 blogger a couple years back, I believe. but that is where I first met Real Truther/Gretavo, Keenan, Casseia, Chris, and Lazlo (who is no longer with us) and a few others. was delighted and relieved to find WTCD. It's been an incredible resource for research and stimulating blog exchange. 

my first question:  why is that other building collapsing? it was 7 and it was on the news later in the day. at that time i figured it was from the reverberation,shaking, and weakening of the foundations due to the collapse of 1 and 2, but i was perplexed. a couple years later it was the hole in the pentagon.. i think Serendipity and WhatReallyHappened were my first sites..then 911truth.org, then all the vids and DRG books, and yes, Chris Bollyn.  so here I am.

recently, i know many are supporting the CIT folks' research. i find it a bit daunting, and will need to revisit in order to comprehend. However, I do question the lack of witnesses brought forth or just coming forth from the east side - on the highways and byways, docks and such, to testify having seen a 757 flyover.  the fact that there would have been customary and frequent air traffic over the pentagon due to close proximity to the airport does not sit right with me.  the most guarded air space? and on 911 after the WTC had been hit and all air traffic was grounded? my husband was in Philly that morning and after hearing the news of the WTC was driving 95 (airport is right there too)  fearfully watching the sky for low-flying planes. Wouldn't DC folkshave been doing the same?