New York Times Gives Large Wooden Horse as Gift to Truthers...
So what interest might the New York Times, which has in the past published storied denying that Larry Silverstein was connected to the nude dance club Runway 69 (as owner or landlord, it's not clear) in running a story about how corrupt the demolition industry is? My guess would be that they want to give fake truthers and others grounds for looking stateside for the possible engineers of the demolition of the WTC. Who after all will want to defend a wrongly accused mafioso? Or a terrorist group like al Qarda for that matter? Or the combination of them working together? Right. This little "gem" from the New York Times, a paper that pimped Pentagon lies to support the illegal invasion of Iraq, should not be taken at face value, which some at 911blogger naturally are doing. It should be taken as a clue to what is being concealed, and that I would wager is that a team of Israeli military/intelligence/volunteers carried out the prep of Lucky Larry's insurance cows, and that these were among the many Israelis deported after 9/11, with the "spy scandals", art students, and dancing Israelis all being red herrings to distract from what they were really up to. Nano-thermite, anthrax, etc. If the US produces it, the Israelis have probably stolen it--provided it has a useful military or industrial application. Then when they use it it is a simple matter to deflect suspicion onto the victims--Americans.
demolition men | mob influence
Sunday's edition of the New York Times (8/2/09) featured a full page on professionals in building demolition, with many facts relevant to 9/11 truth (but without mention of that phrase). Some of the facts disclosed included the following:
In NYC demolition remains unregulated, and organized crime dominates.
Safety regulations are routinely cast aside.
Companies count on making money from selling off scrap.
For extensive details, see "Demolition Man," by William K. Rashbaum and Charles V. Bagli.
»
- gretavo's blog
- Login to post comments
speaking of the Israeli spies...
I was relating this to a friend of a friend the other day. I bet you've come across this response before...
His argument was basically:
"well at least they are Israeli spies and not Al Queada"
The world just keeps getting more and more bizarre.
As for the New York Times...well I don't take much at face value anymore. After 9/11/2001 and the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, I have no trust for the rag because there are really only a few possible reasons why this paper didn't stand up for truth during the invasion of both countries.
1. Maybe I'm super smarter and more observant then the entire New York Times and could just tell the invasion of Iraq was pure bullshit. The New York Times just...got it wrong. (whoops)
Or Maybe...
2. I'm crazy like my neighbor said. But I just coincidentally figured out that the invasion of Iraq war was pure bullshit. The New York Times just 'got it wrong'. You know? Whoops-a-daisy we just helped the Pentagon destroy tens of thousands of lives in Iraq.
Or...
3. My bullshit detector is working perfectly and The New York Times can be counted on to parrot the US Governments propaganda when needed. Even if 100,000+ lives are on the line!
With the demolition data
With the demolition data being unrefutable, there will be attempts to explain it within a context that excludes Silverstein, and perhaps the US Gov. I think the US Gov is expendable except that conspirators from that party will probably squeal and implicate other perps. Blaming the mob gains them a narrative that lets the real perps get away.
I think this effort to blame mafias is exploratory and will be pusued further only if it gains traction in the truth movement and not nipped at the bud.