Movement Heavyweights Deliver KO of "Pentagon Plane Huggers"

Yeah, it's getting obvious to the point of being surreal over there, what with nobodies like Jon Gold, Michael Wolsey, and John Albanese essentially accusing people like David Ray Griffin of damaging the movement. If that weren't bad/ridiculous enough, they do so by promoting the unproven claims of proven liars as evidence that the official conspiracy theory is ultimately true. Jon Gold seems to be pretending to believe that because the administration says they identified the bodies of the passengers and crew of AA77 in the Pentagon, that they identified the passengers and crew of AA77 in the Pentagon. That despite no solid, conclusive evidence showing that AA77 flew into the Pentagon, the administration's claims that it did, combined with what people on the ground believe they saw, are enough to accept the claim as factual beyond doubt.

It's the same with his belief in the "arab muslim IDs" being found at the scenes constituting proof of the official version of events--if you have enough ridiculous and easily falsified/planted evidence, there is no need to be troubled by the glaring absence of any of the real evidence you would expect to be produced in short order, like an analysis of the recovered plane wreckage in its entirety with a proper identification made.

It's a truly remarkable Orwellian leap--if the only evidence presented is totally shady, you have to accept it because the alternative--to claim that it was faked--is just "too absurd" to contemplate. As Victronix derisively said "Oh no, it's all fake, can't prove anything". In other words, if you tell a huge lie and provide a ton of faked evidence to back it up, people will HAVE to believe it because the alternative--that it's all fake--is just not acceptable. For some reason. It just isn't. Because no one could or would do such a thing.

No one would claim to have had family members die in a terrorist attack in exchange for 1.5 million dollars (tax free.) Nope. In America? What are you crazy? You certainly couldn't find enough such scoundrels to fill up four planes worth of phony victims. Even if the flights were on average only some thirty-odd percent full (when was the last time you flew on a plane that was less than half full?) No, to suggest these things (as David Griffin implicitly does by alleging the falsity of the hijacking narratives) is to commit a mortal sin against decency--to impugn, with however much cause, the honesty of a person claiming to have lost a family member in an attack by Arab Muslims. How DARE you not submit to emotional blackmail? How DARE you allow logic and reason to triumph over banal sentimentality?

When we think of 9/11, we think mostly of the people on the planes, said Judge Alvin Hellerstein, a man who believes that intermarriage between Jews and non Jews needs to be discouraged. A man who called money "the universal lubricant" referring to the compensation of victims' families (including the real victims' families, those whose loved ones died when the twin towers were demolished with them inside, like Chief Orio Palmer.)

The whole, real truth about 9/11 will eventually be known, and there will indeed be repercussions. Even if it takes decades, every last one of the real perpetrators and their accomplices will be brought to account. Patience is a virtue reserved for those with clean consciences. Desperation is an indicator of guilt. Time *will* tell...