Hey 9/11 Blogger! Is This Now the JFK Assassination Movement?

From 9/11 Blogger's front page:
Outline of Evidence for the JFK Assassination (Part 1 of 3)
The obvious question that comes to mind is why 9/11 Blogger has decided to focus so much recently on the assassination of JFK. Naturally, I don't believe for one second that Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone nut--there was clearly a conspiracy to kill JFK. But what does it have to do with 9/11?
The fake truthers that run 911 Blogger (Reprehensor et al.) would have you believe that the CIA and the Bush family were among those involved--perhaps the masterminds--and that it was all about keeping JFK from ending the lucrative cold war. The connection to 9/11, then, at least according to the fake 9/11 truth movement, is that both the CIA and the Bush family were *also* among the masterminds of 9/11, but this time to *replace* the cold war with the war on terror. Naturally, all this is done to enrich the nebulous military industrial complex and the oil companies--see how simple it all is?
As far as it goes, I don't have a huge problem with this narrative, I just think it deliberately leaves out a few key issues. Note, for one, that the idea of the military industrial complex excludes the role of two key sectors of the global economic/power structure, namely finance (the banks) and the mass media. You can't produce war materials to sell without the capital that the banks control, and you can't sell a war without the cooperation of the media in concealing the ugly reality from the people, both those who actually fight the wars and those who are forced to pay taxes to fund the war.
Another important part of the narrative that is missing is the complete roster of enemies that JFK had made. Not mentioned in this article on 9/11 Blogger is the fact the JFK had angered David Ben Gurion by opposing Israel's development of nuclear weapons, which Israel was doing clandestinely, under the guise of building nuclear energy capacity with equipment obtained from France. JFK was playing hardball, insisting on inspections of the supposedly "peaceful" reactor at Dimona, and making it clear that the U.S. would not tolerate Israel introducing nuclear weapons into the volatile middle east. Once JFK was out of the way, LBJ looked the other way with regard to Israel's nukes, and what's more, looked the other way when Israel attacked the USS Liberty.
The evidence for the likelihood of Israel's role in the assassination of JFK is well documented in the book Final Judgement by Michael Collins Piper, for those looking for it. It would seem however that the fake truthers at 9/11 Blogger are most definitely NOT interested in looking at any such evidence, much like how they downplay to the point of irrelevance the obvious motives and evidence linking Zionists in America and Israel to 9/11. To put it simply, there would seem to be a campaign afoot to scapegoat the Bush family and the CIA, neither of which are angels, to be sure, for the crimes of 9/11. Whatever their role may have been in either 9/11 or the murder of JFK, a scapegoat is a scapegoat--something or someone sacrificed to achieve atonement for the actual guilty party.
- gretavo's blog
- Login to post comments

"As far as it goes, I don't
"As far as it goes, I don't have a huge problem with this narrative"
Liberals have a tendency to attribute aims to JFK which he never had. NSAM 263 was proposed by Robert McNamara and Maxwell Taylor, against JFK's resistance. NSAM 263 was never based on advocacy of unconditional withdrawal from Vietnam, which liberals have falsely credited JFK with. NSAM 263 was simply McNamara's suggestion that the President should announce that it will be possible to withdraw 1000 troops from Vietnam subject to the condition that the war continues to go well. Kennedy did not like the idea of making any such promise of troop withdrawal, and that's why the final form of NSAM 263 explicitly credits the announcement of a possible withdrawal of 1000 troops to McNamara and Taylor. There is no evidence in the documentary record of Kennedy ever having advocated unconditional withdrawal from Vietnam. Liberals have used this myth to draw up a glorified image of JFK. Regarding Kennedy's conflicts with Israel, the relation between this as a motive for the assassination and the final end result is much clearer and more direct. If NSAM 263 had really been the motive for the assassination then McNamara and Taylor would have been booted out, since they were the ones who proposed it. But they weren't and it wasn't.
thanks, Anon...
This is one angle I have not read about. My guess is that part of the reason that JFK got tarred with the "soft on communism" smear (despite playing pretty tough with the "commies" during the Cuban Missile Crisis) was his failure to support the Bay of Pigs operation. This earned him the undying enmity of the exiled anti-Castro Cubans, but even that is more complicated than it would seem. Joining the wealthy exiles in their desire to have Castro overthrown were the organized crime figures who had done a brisk business operating the gambling and drug rackets in Batista's Cuba.
From Wikipedia:
Meyer Lansky was also a committed Zionist, and even fled to Israel for two years until he was extradited to the U.S. Jack Ruby, whose real name was Jacob Rubinstein, was a Lansky associate and also a hard core Zionist. His murder of Lee Harvey Oswald was perhaps what sealed the mystery of who killed JFK. JFK's brother, who would have reopened the investigation had he become president, was himself murdered, and allegedly by a lone Palestinian nut acting alone.
"We are not your problem, we are Israelis. Your problem is our problem. The Palestinians are the problem."*
And so it goes.
* the "Dancing Israelis" to their arresting officer on 9/11/01
LBJ was even more soft on
LBJ was even more soft on Castro. LBJ cancelled all of the attempts to assassinate Castrowhich had been in operation when he took office. Of course the far Right-wing hated JFK, the same way they hated LBJ, Eisenhower and Nixon too. But nothing which followed the JFK assassination was at all in the service of the anti-Castro lobby. LBJ simply argued that the attempts to kill Castro were more trouble than they were worth and he put a halt to it. LBJ was not working on a particularly anti-Castro agenda.
Executive Order 11110
JFK crossed wires with the de facto government: the international banksters' with their global usury empire, and their US outpost: the Fed.
http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/executiveorder11110.htm
Did anyone here see that recent David Icke article:
The Elephant In The Room...
... BUT SEE IT AND YOU'RE 'RACIST'
http://rense.com/general86/zelephant.htm
He says zionism & israel are Rothschild's babies. I don't know maybe Icke is held in low esteem here but that's a pretty good article. A real user should post it for discussion.
my take on Icke...
...is that his role is to associate much of the real truth, which he reveals, with the other, nutty, stuff he peddles like reptilian overlords and the like...
this executive order business...
FYI, here's a discussion about "Sorcha Faal"
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread304918/pg1
Sorcha Faal is a BS Artist Extradinaire
You can pretty much automatically reject everything spewed by anonymous online BS artist 'Sorcha Faal' and assume that the opposite of whatever he/she claims is true. Anybody who credits or sources 'Sorcha Faal' is either a complete idiot or is knowlingly peddling disinfo and complete nonsense.
so wait...
are you telling me that Obama is NOT an agent of the Vatican? Damn! but the Vatican and the Rothschilds ARE mortal enemies right? That's why the pope kowtows to the Israelis so much? I'm SO conFUSED!! :)