Hey 9/11 Blogger! Is This Now the JFK Assassination Movement?

gretavo's picture

From 9/11 Blogger's front page:

Outline of Evidence for the JFK Assassination (Part 1 of 3)

The obvious question that comes to mind is why 9/11 Blogger has decided to focus so much recently on the assassination of JFK.  Naturally, I don't believe for one second that Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone nut--there was clearly a conspiracy to kill JFK.  But what does it have to do with 9/11?

The fake truthers that run 911 Blogger (Reprehensor et al.) would have you believe that the CIA and the Bush family were among those involved--perhaps the masterminds--and that it was all about keeping JFK from ending the lucrative cold war.  The connection to 9/11, then, at least according to the fake 9/11 truth movement, is that both the CIA and the Bush family were *also* among the masterminds of 9/11, but this time to *replace* the cold war with the war on terror.  Naturally, all this is done to enrich the nebulous military industrial complex and the oil companies--see how simple it all is?

As far as it goes, I don't have a huge problem with this narrative, I just think it deliberately leaves out a few key issues.  Note, for one, that the idea of the military industrial complex excludes the role of two key sectors of the global economic/power structure, namely finance (the banks) and the mass media.  You can't produce war materials to sell without the capital that the banks control, and you can't sell a war without the cooperation of the media in concealing the ugly reality from the people, both those who actually fight the wars and those who are forced to pay taxes to fund the war.

Another important part of the narrative that is missing is the complete roster of enemies that JFK had made.  Not mentioned in this article on 9/11 Blogger is the fact the JFK had angered David Ben Gurion by opposing Israel's development of nuclear weapons, which Israel was doing clandestinely, under the guise of building nuclear energy capacity with equipment obtained from France.  JFK was playing hardball, insisting on inspections of the supposedly "peaceful" reactor at Dimona, and making it clear that the U.S. would not tolerate Israel introducing nuclear weapons into the volatile middle east.  Once JFK was out of the way, LBJ looked the other way with regard to Israel's nukes, and what's more, looked the other way when Israel attacked the USS Liberty.

The evidence for the likelihood of Israel's role in the assassination of JFK is well documented in the book Final Judgement by Michael Collins Piper, for those looking for it.  It would seem however that the fake truthers at 9/11 Blogger are most definitely NOT interested in looking at any such evidence, much like how they downplay to the point of irrelevance the obvious motives and evidence linking Zionists in America and Israel to 9/11.  To put it simply, there would seem to be a campaign afoot to scapegoat the Bush family and the CIA, neither of which are angels, to be sure, for the crimes of 9/11.  Whatever their role may have been in either 9/11 or the murder of JFK, a scapegoat is a scapegoat--something or someone sacrificed to achieve atonement for the actual guilty party.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Annoymouse's picture

"As far as it goes, I don't

"As far as it goes, I don't have a huge problem with this narrative"

Liberals have a tendency to attribute aims to JFK which he never had. NSAM 263 was proposed by Robert McNamara and Maxwell Taylor, against JFK's resistance. NSAM 263 was never based on advocacy of unconditional withdrawal from Vietnam, which liberals have falsely credited JFK with. NSAM 263 was simply McNamara's suggestion that the President should announce that it will be possible to withdraw 1000 troops from Vietnam subject to the condition that the war continues to go well. Kennedy did not like the idea of making any such promise of troop withdrawal, and that's why the final form of NSAM 263 explicitly credits the announcement of a possible withdrawal of 1000 troops to McNamara and Taylor. There is no evidence in the documentary record of Kennedy ever having advocated unconditional withdrawal from Vietnam. Liberals have used this myth to draw up a glorified image of JFK. Regarding Kennedy's conflicts with Israel, the relation between this as a motive for the assassination and the final end result is much clearer and more direct. If NSAM 263 had really been the motive for the assassination then McNamara and Taylor would have been booted out, since they were the ones who proposed it. But they weren't and it wasn't.

gretavo's picture

thanks, Anon...

This is one angle I have not read about.  My guess is that part of the reason that JFK got tarred with the "soft on communism" smear (despite playing pretty tough with the "commies" during the Cuban Missile Crisis) was his failure to support the Bay of Pigs operation.  This earned him the undying enmity of the exiled anti-Castro Cubans, but even that is more complicated than it would seem.  Joining the wealthy exiles in their desire to have Castro overthrown were the organized crime figures who had done a brisk business operating the gambling and drug rackets in Batista's Cuba.

From Wikipedia:

However, the 1959 Cuban revolution and the rise of Fidel Castro changed the climate for mob investment in Cuba. On that New Year's Eve of 1958, while Batista was preparing to flee to the Dominican Republic and then on to Florida (where he died in exile in 1973), Lansky was celebrating the $3 million he made in the first year of operations at his 440-room, $18 million palace, the Habana Riviera. Many of the casinos were looted and destroyed that night, including several of Lansky's.

On January 8, 1959, Castro marched into Havana and took over, setting up shop in the Hilton. Lansky had fled the day before for the Bahamas and other Caribbean destinations. The new Cuban president, Manuel Urrutia Lleó closed the casinos. and nationalized all the casino and hotel properties.

In October of 1960 Castro nationalized the island's hotel-casinos and outlawed gambling. This action essentially wiped out Lansky's asset base and revenue streams. He lost an estimated $7 million. With the additional crackdown on casinos in Miami, Lansky was forced to depend on his Las Vegas revenues.

Meyer Lansky was also a committed Zionist, and even fled to Israel for two years until he was extradited to the U.S.  Jack Ruby, whose real name was Jacob Rubinstein, was a Lansky associate and also a hard core Zionist.  His murder of Lee Harvey Oswald was perhaps what sealed the mystery of who killed JFK.  JFK's brother, who would have reopened the investigation had he become president, was himself murdered, and allegedly by a lone Palestinian nut acting alone.

"We are not your problem, we are Israelis.  Your problem is our problem.  The Palestinians are the problem."*

And so it goes.

 
* the "Dancing Israelis" to their arresting officer on 9/11/01

Annoymouse's picture

LBJ was even more soft on

LBJ was even more soft on Castro. LBJ cancelled all of the attempts to assassinate Castrowhich had been in operation when he took office. Of course the far Right-wing hated JFK, the same way they hated LBJ, Eisenhower and Nixon too. But nothing which followed the JFK assassination was at all in the service of the anti-Castro lobby. LBJ simply argued that the attempts to kill Castro were more trouble than they were worth and he put a halt to it. LBJ was not working on a particularly anti-Castro agenda.

Annoymouse's picture

Executive Order 11110

JFK crossed wires with the de facto government: the international banksters' with their global usury empire, and their US outpost: the Fed.
http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/executiveorder11110.htm

Did anyone here see that recent David Icke article:
The Elephant In The Room...
... BUT SEE IT AND YOU'RE 'RACIST'

http://rense.com/general86/zelephant.htm

He says zionism & israel are Rothschild's babies. I don't know maybe Icke is held in low esteem here but that's a pretty good article. A real user should post it for discussion.

gretavo's picture

my take on Icke...

...is that his role is to associate much of the real truth, which he reveals, with the other, nutty, stuff he peddles like reptilian overlords and the like...

gretavo's picture

this executive order business...

Here's what wikipedia has to say about executive order 11110:
Purpose

Silver certificates were printed without interest. The Order was for the Treasury to issue silver certificates against all silver held by the government which did not already have certificates against it. The Order was needed due to the passage of Public Law 88-36 which repealed the Silver Purchase Act and other related monetary measures. One result was that after the repeals, only the President could issue new silver certificates.[citation needed]

The Federal Reserve System could replace the certificates, but only in larger denominations. The thrust of the Order returned the authority to issue new silver certificates (and specify denominations) back to the U.S. Treasury.

This executive order allowed for the Federal Reserve System to distribute and exchange currency at lower denominations that met the growing economic need. The authoritative basis for the Order was substantially nullified in 1982 with the passage of Public Law 97-258.

The Order was never directly reversed, but in 1987, Executive Order 12608 revoked the section that added by Executive Order 11110[1], essentially nullifying it.

Which begs the question what is Public Law 97-258?  Well, it was passed by the 98th Congress in 1982 under Reagan, but I haven't been able to find the actual text, though apparently public laws get written into the U.S. Code every 6 years so it technically no longer exists.  Extra credit for anyone who finds the text!

So anyway, in my searches I found this weird story, which we might be able to triangulate towards the real truth with... 

Obama Orders “Total Takedown” Of US Federal Reserve Bank
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers (Traducción al Español abajo)
Russian Foreign Ministry sources are reporting in the Kremlin today that US President Barak Obama has informed Prime Minister Putin and Chinese President Hu of his intentions to “totally takedown” the private banking system known as the US Federal Reserve that since its dubious creation in 1913 has had complete control over the printing of all US money in what many detractors have long stated was in violation of the American Constitution.
Virtually unknown to the American people about the Federal Reserve Bank is that it is comprised of 12 branches that are private corporations whose ownership is shrouded in secrecy and is the largest holder of United States debt said to be in excess of over $4 Trillion.
Fueling Obama’s growing anger over the Federal Reserve Bank, these reports continue, has been their arrogant refusal to reply to the many questions being asked of them by the United States Congress over what has happened to over $8 Trillion of US taxpayer money, and which caused US Lawmakers to take the unprecedented step of issuing a subpoena yesterday to force the Federal Reserve to turn over internal documents related to Bank of America's acquisition of Merrill Lynch.
The Federal Reserve Bank, in a desperate bid to hold on to its power over the Untied States, has hired one of Washington D.C.’s top lobbyists, Linda Robertson, who curiously, headed the Washington lobbying office of Enron Corporation which became one of the largest corporate bankruptcies in US history after they cheated investors out of a staggering $11 billion.
More ominously though, with Obama’s plan to destroy the Federal Reserve Bank he becomes only the second US President to attempt to break this insidious creatures stranglehold over the United States after President John F. Kennedy, on June 4, 1963, signed Executive Order No. 11110 to strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the government at interest.
On that day President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110 that returned to the US government the power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve. Kennedy's order gave the Treasury the power “to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars [photo 3rd on left] in the Treasury.” This meant that for every ounce of silver in the US Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation. In all, Kennedy brought nearly $4.3 billion in US notes into circulation.
Five short months later, President Kennedy was assassinated, and upon assuming office, newly sworn in President Lyndon Johnson recalled all of the US notes Kennedy had put into circulation and making President Ronald Reagan the next to challenge the power of the Federal Reserve, but which abruptly ended with his near assassination on March 30, 1981 by the hand of the crazed son of former CIA Director, and then Vice President, George Bush’s closest friends and oil business backer John Hinckley Sr.
President Reagan had pitted himself against the Federal Reserve over their refusal to lower the crushing interests rates they had imposed upon the American people during the US recession of 1980-1982 which was their greatest since the Great Depression, but after his near death quietly signed into law on September 13, 1982, H.R.6128 which became Public Law No: 97-258 that was written on the behalf of the Federal Reserve by little known US Congressman Peter Wallace Rodin o Jr., with no co-sponsors, and made it illegal for any future American President to print on money for the American people.
But, according to Russian legal experts, even though Public Law No: 97-258 does appear on its surface to constrain President Obama; President Kennedy’s Executive Order No. 11110 has never been repealed by any American President making a showdown “inevitable” between Obama and the Federal Reserve before the US Supreme Court, and which Obama has recently nominated US Federal Judge Sonia Sotomayor to America’s highest court where she will become the 6th Roman Catholic Justice and giving the Vatican near total control of US monetary policy.
And, in this epic battle between the Vatican backed Obama and the Rothschild backed Federal Reserve, we can plainly see that the 1849 secret agreements between these two monstrous powers that have enslaved the West is nearing its catastrophic end, and with no clear winner to be seen but an entire World being destroyed in its titanic aftermath.
In what Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu considered a “threat”, the US stated to Israel this week that “We are going to change the world. Please, don't interfere.”, the American people have not even been told.
This cannot be said of Putin, however, who immediately upon learning of Obama’s “battle to the death” with the Federal Reserve joined China and Brazil and ordered Russia’s Central Bank to begin divesting itself of US Federal Reserve holdings and replace them with International Monetary Fund bonds as the United States is about to be crushed with what London’s Fleet Street News is calling “The Triple Crown of Financial Catastrophes” which can very well see the complete destruction of America.
And, most sadly of all, the American people themselves continue to remain the only people in the World not knowing about what is soon to happen to them. One indeed wonders what it will take for them to ever wake up from their long sleep.

© June 11, 2009 EU and US all rights reserved
[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with,in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth. Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/ misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]

gretavo's picture

FYI, here's a discussion about "Sorcha Faal"

Keenan's picture

Sorcha Faal is a BS Artist Extradinaire

You can pretty much automatically reject everything spewed by anonymous online BS artist 'Sorcha Faal' and assume that the opposite of whatever he/she claims is true. Anybody who credits or sources 'Sorcha Faal' is either a complete idiot or is knowlingly peddling disinfo and complete nonsense.

gretavo's picture

so wait...

are you telling me that Obama is NOT an agent of the Vatican? Damn! but the Vatican and the Rothschilds ARE mortal enemies right? That's why the pope kowtows to the Israelis so much? I'm SO conFUSED!! :)