Racist Idiots on Parade: The Capt. May - Von Brunn Connection

casseia's picture

I finally dredged from my memory the reason that I was (most unpleasantly) acquainted with von Brunn and his website -- back in 2007-8 he was a "character reference" for Capt. May, believe it or not. I'm posting the material from the "Portland Nuclear Inquest" Yahoo group that I came across back then and revisited today -- just in case they try to wipe the slate clean. The Capt. May connection is perhaps THE significant connection between von Brunn and the 9/11 Truth movement -- which is merely to say that when open racists and nutty demagogues are tolerated, we end up one handshake away from people like von Brunn. Incidentally, the reason May felt compelled to repost von Brunn's assurance to us that he really isn't a racist is because Carol Brouillet was taking flak for and concerned about having him (May) on her radio show. - c455

Message #1
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/Portland-Nuclear-Inquest/message/1139

Dear Mr. von Brunn,

Thank you for your consideration, as expressed in your note below:

"James W. von Brunn" wrote:

Hello Captain May.
I was about to post this message; then decided not to. You have enough troubles.
jvb

(Back to Mr. von Brunn)

Candidly, though, I would prefer that you post the critical note below to your list, and not to be impeded by my troubles. In it, you say much to my credit about my willingness to defend the best in our nation -- the Constitution. That which you say to my discredit -- that I am not a racist -- is accurate. As much as I am under attack by Zionist apologists for being a racist and anti-Semite, your remarks will help to balance the picture.

Accordingly, I'll publish this to my groups so that they can read -- and I can later cite -- a well worded denunciation of my lack of racism. None of this in any way changes my gratitude to you for the many expressions of friendship you have made in the past. Again, please publish your note expressing your opinion that I am not suitable for the role of an Aryan Leader. I agree with you. Once my character and motives are made plain, I will know that anyone who associates with me does so with an informed perspective of me.

Best regards, Captain May

TWIMC:

c/o Captain Eric May

We dispute several of Captain Eric May's political conclusions while defending his right to express them.

Captain May expresses good, not so good, and bad concepts: He defends the U.S. Constitution, and vigorously fights those who threaten it (Neocons, Mossad, Money); he confuses Bolshevism with Fascism; he denies the importance of Race.

The Constitution is a product of Westernman for Westernman.

Fascism (one for all and all for one) is Nationalism (Racialism), wherein one race occupies its own territory (Patriotism). Bolshevism is Globalism (Zionism/Catholicism).

DNA = Race; RACE = Culture; CULTURE = CIVILIZATION. ( Disraeli:"Race is everthing!").

I believe Captain May is an honorable and talented man. His courageous (perhaps fatal to his health) fight against enemies of the Constitution is highly commended. However, because of his serious conceptual flaws, Captain May's right to an Aryan Leadership role must be denied.

James von Brunn
www.holywesternempire. no-live-linky-from-wtcd

Message #2
Re: COMMENTS RE: Captain May's self-defense
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/Portland-Nuclear-Inquest/message/1147

ADVERTISEMENT
Dear Mr. von Brunn,

I believe I understand the distinction you are trying to make. Believe it or not, that perspective is already represented within Ghost Troop, since one of our black members is a member of the Nation of Islam, which is a separatist movement.

In your opinion, can there be cooperation between various racial groups with common goals, such as a discovery of the truth about 9/11 or opposition to Zionism? Since I wrote an article earlier this week about the Nazis, we could take the example the German SS, which began to admit both Slavic and Muslim members after the failed offensives of 1941-42. Then there's the matter of "honorary Aryan" status, which Hitler is said to have confirmed on numerous Jews.

Finally, on the matter of race mixing, clearly that has occurred widely, even within the ethnic group that we loosely call Aryan. The word Aryan, as I understand it, is synonymous with Indo-European, and represents a wide variety of people who seem to have been generated from and cultured by the southwestern and northeastern expansions of Aryans into India and Europe (hence the term Indo-European). As a philologist I can detect the cultural, racial and linguistic evidence that all Indo-Europeans came from a common core source. No two parts of this quite extensive family are anywhere near identical, though, and every one of them has intermingled its blood with indigenous people. As far as I can tell, Northern Indians, Afghans, Iranians, Russians and all Europeans have about equal claim to being descendents of the original Aryans.

Many thanks for your correspondence on these points that are of interest to me.

Best regards, Captain May

"James W. von Brunn" wrote:

Hello Captain May,

There is considerable difference between a Racialist and a Racist. The former expects each race to exist and prosper within its own territory.
America's Founding Fathers were Racialists. They founded a Republic for their White progeny - NOT a Democratic Racial Garbage Dump.

WILCO. As you wish, I now post this.

jvb

Message #3
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/Portland-Nuclear-Inquest/message/1948

Dear Mr. von Brunn,

Many thanks for sending along my recent "Introduction to Ghost Troop" to your readers list. I agree with the comment below that I was quite naïve about the degree of danger by mission of conscience would entail -- at least until the Dr. David Kelly assassination of July 17, 2003. Dr. Kelly's death was an unmistakable signal to me that things were becoming fatal for those of us opposed to the Bush League, and you may find the letter I wrote the next day to be of great interest -- especially to those who have kept up with the Dr. David Kelly cover up in the UK: http://www.ghosttroop.net/davidkelly.htm

As for my much overemphasized connection with the Jesuit order, I have to admit that I was quite naïve when it came to this most interesting -- some would say insidious -- branch of the Catholic Church. Candidly, I tried to exit the infowar because of its hazards at the beginning of 2005 and I sought the counsel of my wife's priest because she, a lifelong Catholic, found that most comfortable to turn in that direction. For my own part, I was brought up as a nominal Protestant, but had no firm religious conviction. That the local priest, Father James Marshall, happened to be a Jesuit is pure circumstance. I had no opinion at all about the Jesuits at the time, and would just have willingly talked things over with a Carmelite, Dominican or any other priest.

Father Marshall was quite new to his avocation, having been ordained around a year earlier. Do give him credit, though, he was the only counselor for whom I turned -- including several Protestant ministers -- who disagreed with my intent to try to save my own life by turning my back on the 911-2B event that I had already begun to analyze an attempt to interdict. He gave my work as serious reading and prayerful reflection, and told me candidly that being a Christian meant following Christ, and the Christ foremost example to us was one of self-sacrifice, not self salvation.

While I'm pleased that many members of Ghost Troop and a good number of my readers see me in a heroic light, honesty compels me to admit that despite Father Marshall's advice, I still dropped out of the infowar from January to July in 2005, only returning after the London bombings of 7/7 made apparent to me that there would soon be a 911-2B attempt against my home, the Houston area, in short order. As Father Marshall was near at hand when I made this decision, and he sought and received permission from his superiors to perform an emergency baptism of me because of what he and his superiors saw as the very real prospect that I might be assassinated as a result of my renewed mission of conscience. It was only at this point that I began to have any formal connection with the Catholic Church. With time, I have come to have many questions about its politics and political involvement, but I have never questioned the simple piety of the priest who exhorted me and honored me when I finally heeded his exhortation.

The international broadcast I made on the night of July 28, 2005 is the most listened to of any of my interviews over the last three years. That night the Bush League tried to blow up Texas City, Texas, and absent Ghost Troop efforts, they would've succeeded. The interview has been edited into two 15-minute segments, and is available at: http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/capt1.htm

It was shortly after the night of July 28, 2005 that I began to manifest the first signs of Lou Gehrig's disease. I don't believe the onset of my malady was simply egregiously bad luck. I rather believe that Father Marshall's hunch about the danger into which I was going was right on.

I hope these few notes of explanation would help those who are interested in my work as Ghost Troop commander to assess my work from an informed perspective. As for the notes your correspondent made on my cryptanalysis, I invite him to read an essay-length exposition of it that I did for The Lone Star Iconoclast shortly after last year's 7/11 Mumbai bombings: http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=318 Incidentally, I only recently learned the meaning of the coded "88" that you often use with your initials to close your correspondence. Code, it would appear, is all around us if we only look for it!

Best regards, Captain May

"James W. von Brunn" wrote:

Hello Captain May,

Rec'd this reply ( among several - all positve) to an email of yours that I forwarded. The subject matter was your description of Ghost Troop.

Regards to thee,
jvb-88

From: john@
To: vbrunn@...
Subject: Once again confess myself mistaken
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:48:48 +0000

Once again confess myself mistaken, this time about Capt’ May and his organisation.
After recently visiting his website am full of admiration and hope for him and his org’s part in the war, whereas, previously considered him too much of a naivist etc, to merit consideration. I don’t know where I got the former impression from, though still think he is a little naïve if for no other reason his admission that he feared for his life after commencing his mission- and also in his consulting a Jesuit priest. Whilst I would hold up my hands and admit to having once shared the same sorts of fears and stupid faith once upon a time, I was barely in my Twenties then, had been detained, questioned about my political beliefs and been beaten up by the police and threatened with death. And besides, had been raised in a fanatically religious (Irish/ Roman Catholic) environment.
Do not know what to make of his numeric theory- have seen too many otherwise good- but too clever for their common sense- types, become useless due to an obsession with arcanery.
That said- most Jews I have known well were much disposed towards this stuff - a racial trait I suspect . The thousands of our foot soldiers could better be prepared if they each had a calendar with significant likely dates highlighted.
Thus, my two pennyworth:
Yesterday 27-12-207 Benazir Bhutto Pakistan=
9-3-9 =21=3 Or
3x7
JB

Message #4
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/Portland-Nuclear-Inquest/message/2021

RE: Hard Questions for Revisionist Donald Cassidy

ADVERTISEMENT
Dear Mr. von Brunn,

I am flattered by your high regards for me. I believe I'm being more Socratic than naïve in asking Mr. Cassidy to corroborate his views. I beg for your continued patience, and even your sympathy as I tried to sort this thorny issue of the Holocaust/Holohoax out for myself. Those who believe fervently in the historicity of the Holocaust attack me for even allowing questions of the matter, while those who question the historicity of the Holocaust, alleging instead that it is a Holohoax, torment me for not asking more questions!

Thank you for corroborating accounts I have read that General Tommy Franks is Jewish. If you have a link, that would be most helpful to me. I must admit you have caught me not reading the link you sent me below earlier. I will take a look at it for myself and pass it along to my Ghost Troop and Portland Nuclear Inquest cohorts.

Best regards, Captain May

"James W. von Brunn" wrote:

HELLO CAPTAIN MAY,

YOU MUST KNOW THAT I THINK VERY HIGHLY OF YOU. HOWEVER AT TIMES I AM DISMAYED BY YOUR NAIVETÉ. I INVITED YOU TO READ MY WELL RESEARCHED MANUSCRIPT. YOU REFUSE. AT MY WEBSITE THERE IS A CHAPTER (IT'S FREE !) ON THE HOLOCAUST, INCORPORATING MUCH OF WHAT APPEARS IN CASSIDY'S ESSAY AND MORE.

"YOU CAN LEAD A DONKEY TO WATER BUT YOU CAN'T MAKE IT DRINK."
(West Point aphorism !!!).
JVB

PS: GEN. FRANKS ADMITTED HE IS JEWISH

Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:05:03 -0800
From: captainmay@...
Subject: Hard Questions for Revisionist Donald Cassidy
To: captainmay@...

Dear Mr. Cassidy,

I was quite surprised, when checking up on your essay below, to find that a photocopy of West Point's 1915 yearbook supports your claim that General Eisenhower was part Jewish: http://judicial-inc.biz/Hopie_ike.htm

Background (included at link for Message #1) -- May-Brouillet correspondence:
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:08:45 -0700
From: captainmay@...
Subject: Attention 911Blogger -- Captain May's self-defense
To: captainmay@...

Dear 911Blogger:

I am indebted to Ms. Brouillet and your site for posting my article, "Amerika Uber Alles" -- Our Nazi Nation -- http://www.911blogger.com/node/11758 It seems to have attained my purpose of stimulating a lively debate, and is being published widely worldwide. I think these things argue in its favor.

However, I see that at 911Blogger there is a great amount of arguing against the article -- or rather, against its author. Most of this involves charges that I am an anti-Semite and a racist. I believe that the writer posted your forum should be entitled to a self-defense against such invidious charges.

Accordingly, I ask that all interested parties -- on all sides -- arranged that this reply be posted at 911Blogger. I sent it to Ms. Brouillet earlier this evening in reply in to the concerns that postings at 911Blogger had caused her. It is my truthful answer to those who accuse me of anti-Semitism and racism.

Best regards, Captain May

Captain May wrote:

Dear Ms. Brouillet,

I'm not at all surprised at the level of antipathy directed toward my article. My Lone Star Iconoclast editor, W. Leon Smith told me he thought I had a great essay when I submitted it to him Saturday, and we both chuckled, because we both knew that meant I would catch hell from the disinfo crowd for it. I have found it interesting that every single criticism of my article at 911Blogger has been ad hominem; no one has challenged me on my facts, except in terms so general as to be irrelevant. That's the rule of infowar, as I've come to understand it: until you're under attack, you're really not a serious participant. I don't expect the attacks to abate, because the velocity of the article -- published worldwide every day since its first publication -- has not abated.

I understand your concern about being the target of criticism directed against me. I am consistently attacked as an anti-Semite and a half-crazed numerologist. On the latter point of the "embedded code," I think you have already researched my work and compared it with your own understanding of that subject well enough to know that my work in the area is not a matter of whimsy. When untrained people buy the National Enquirer to read their horoscopes, it's called superstition; but when an intelligence officer with a high IQ and linguistic background examines numeric sequencing as coding its called cryptanalysis.

As to my alleged anti-Semitism, I can state my position clearly. I believe that anti-Semitism is a form of racism, in that it presupposes that Jews have an ethnic predisposition on the basis of birth. That would be the Nazi argument, which I oppose. I believe that there is a phenomenon that we could identify as Jewish ethnocentricity -- which we generally call Zionism -- that is a key factor in shaping our national situation. Anyone who argues differently, so far as I can see it, is simply naïve. As to the particular article dug up to attack me, I don't think there's anything in it that was factually incorrect, so I offer no revisions. Anyone who thinks that the information media and entertainment media are not dominated by Jews is badly underinformed. I am distinct from my Internet opponents in that I actually have broad experience with the various media of which I speak, and I know exactly what I'm talking about.

That being said, count on me to be discreet as your guest, if you want me to appear. It would be impossible to talk sense without talking about Zionism, but I can avoid the words Jew and Jewish. Incidentally, I have friends who are Jewish -- although they are labeled self-hating Jews because they do not adhere to Zionist ideals.

Since the charge that I am anti-Semitic is a close cousin to the possible charge that I am racist, please be assured that if I am a racist, I'm a very confused one indeed. My Wife Is from Louisiana Creole stock, containing a lovely mixture of French, Irish, Negro, and Indian blood. You can find a fine picture of her in my article about Lou Gehrig's disease at: http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=1502&z=142 Before I became ill, I taught tae kwon do to several classes of students. If you will refer to my Ghost Troop Introduction site (which has my bio), you can click on my martial arts photo at the top and find an interesting black-and-white photo that will tell you much about me: http://www.geocities.com/onlythecaptain/ Finally, you can refer to my Ghost Troop photo album and find a picture of me with one of my long-term Ghost Troops, Shahid Allah: http://us.f818.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=9897_60839603_12882499... Should you want someone to join us for a while in the interview, I would unhesitatingly recommended him, as he is experienced, intelligent and articulate.

I'm glad that you'll be watching A Beautiful Mind tomorrow, and believe that you will find it most interesting. Please do give me a call at my home number if you would like to discuss it -- or if you'd like to know about other movies that can be easily decoded. As I consider myself to be on an official (and regrettably, fatal) mission of conscience, I always go by my military title of Captain May, not the familiar Eric.

Best regards,

Captain Eric H. May, MI/PAO
Ghost Troop Commander

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Annoymouse's picture

CNN on holocaust church shooting & conspiracies

"Some Suspect Conspiracy in Holocaust Museum Case"
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/06/16/museum.shooting

http://911blogger.com/node/20420

"SnowCrash" comments:
Their website seems to date back to at least Nov 9, 2004.

Other than that, I also find this whole Von Brunn business suspicious. The administration needs an association between Holocaust deniers and 9/11 truth, and bam: a Holocaust denying 9/11 skeptic attacks the Holocaust museum. Beck and Baker (former CIA operative) then aggressively latch on to it, calling him a 9/11 truth hero based on what information? A spokesperson then explicitly, and oddly notes that there was no forewarning, and before we know it, the migthy Wurlitzer is playing the same tune all over the media.

Something stinks here, from beginning to end. Didn't the 9/11 truth-Holocaust denial association campaign offensive begin with Obama's Middle East speech, after which Brzezinski fired another salvo, after which Von Brunn attacked, after which Beck and Baker latched on?

All this after the release of the Active Thermitic Material paper, after Gage gets a mainstream breakthrough.

Then Von Brunn attacks providing ammo for smear jobs, and Bentham is embarassed which is then latched onto also.

How chronologically convenient.