An open letter and warning to Dr. Steven Jones about 911blogger.com
An open letter and warning to Dr. Steven Jones (and CD advocates) about 911blogger.com
Dear Dr. Jones,
I presume you are a busy man and I would not want to waste any of your valuable time. I commend your work dedicated to finding the truth about 9-11. I would like to warn you however that the truth movement is infiltrated by actors who have an agenda that conflicts with exposing the whole truth about 9-11. I guess you know this as much after your conflicts over Scholars for 911 Truth. 911blogger is another site that is infiltrated and operated with an agenda that is not for a complete exposure of the truth. While the site reports a lot of 9-11 news, there is also a brazen attempt within the site to control comments in order to fit an agenda. This control is not always obvious, but at critical junctures it is exposed when the site moderators silence or purge members who do not toe the line. 911blogger has for a very long time been undermining information on controlled demolitions. While they dare not contradict the evidence of CD, the position that CD should be less mentioned in favor of other 9-11 issues has become the site's silently enforced agenda. This may strike most as a benign emphasis of one approach to advocacy over another, but it is not. The attempt to emphasize other issues is, I think, calculated to allow a way out for some of the perpetrators of the crime. More specifically, focusing on evidence other than controlled demolition allows Mossad, and the Israeli government to extricate itself from prosecution for 9-11. To this end, 911blogger has been a consistent promoter of LIHOP, the narrative that AlQuaeda prosecuted the attacks with the consent, but not active execution by the US Government. Your work on CD and that of AE911truth has done much to destroy the credibility of this meme, but this has not stopped 911blogger to continue to promote narratives that focus on Pakistan or Saudi Arabia. Let me make it clear, I deduce from 911blogger's operation that it is trying to protect Israeli operatives only, while everyone else is fair game including the possible co conspirators in the US government. I leave you to do what you would with this information. May the truth prevail in the end.
Best regards,
Juandelacruz
For reference see:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/20402
and
- juandelacruz's blog
- Login to post comments
To Richard Gage, this warning applies to you as well
I would like to amend my warning above given the theory advanced by Kevin Ryan ( http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0907/S00124.htm ) which attempts to reconcile controlled demolition and allegations that Arabs or Muslims (+ the Bush clan) are responsible for 9-11. This theory as expressed in Ryan's recent article still avoids mention of Israeli agents and the large number of Zionists in key positions of the Bush administration.
What is wrong with this narrative? GW Bush is involved in at least the cover up of 9-11. But pushing the Arab/Muslim angle is just a diversion away from the perpetrators that LIHOP advocates are protecting - Israel. In Ryan's narrative, US Gov leaders conspired with Muslim terrorists to attack a building complex that is owned by a personal friend of Benyamin Netanyahu. How implausible can this get. If there was any truth to this, I do not think Silverstein or the Israeli Govt would have kept quiet about it. In fact, I do not think the Israeli Gov would have remained a US ally if their compatriot's valuable property was attacked by the US in connivance with Israel's enemies. If Israel really was innocent, they would have sicked AIPAC to demand a reinvestigation of 9-11 and perhaps demanded justice in international courts. Do not be fooled by this narrative.
As pointed out by DR Griffin, the evidence of Muslim involvement is lacking. Blaming the patsy has always been a goal of the real perpetrators, Kevin Ryan's research seems to share that same goal.
http://davidraygriffin.com/articles/was-america-attacked-by-muslims-on-9...
I expect lihop advocates like Jon Gold will now embrace CD along with pushing on the involvement of Arabs and Muslims.
well said, juan!
not sure whether they will take it to heart, but you put it very well.
Just an update
As further evidence of 911blogger and Jon Gold working against controlled demolition, I am citing this thread from 911blogger:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/21825
some of the contents of that thread are archived here:
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2525
I would also note that since Kevin Ryan's attempt to remix CD as the work of Arab/Muslim terrorists + Bush clan seems to have fallen flat on its face, Jon Gold has continued to stay away or discredit CD.